It’s common knowledge today that data labeling in general and
This series of articles will look at 3 common categories of spacial or “feet-on-street” crowdsourcing – along with the use cases – that improve our daily lives both as private citizens and consumers, as well as business owners. The first article will cover spatial crowdsourcing and web mapping; the second one will explain crowdsourcing in the context of brick-and-mortar retail; and the last article will dive into crowd-assisted strategies involved in verification of business information.
Whether you’re looking to beat traffic by using a less-known travel route, deciding on a nearby diner that has decent reviews, searching for a place to get a haircut when you’re new in town, or trying to locate the nearest post office to drop off a parcel, you’re likely to turn to the same source – online maps. The field of digital mapping and the web mapping platforms that offer these services are everywhere these days, and much of what we see on these platforms is supported by crowdsourcing.
Granted, there’s more than one way the data is put together in computer cartography in order to offer a working product to the end user. But when it comes to the all important last-mile outer layer of information – names of establishments, exact addresses, accessibility, position of on-site objects, etc — these are very often tackled by human labelers who bring us the latest and most accurate information.
Although different crowd-assisted tasks may be applicable to mapping, arguably the most common category is “spatial crowdsourcing” aka “feet-on-street” or simply “field” task. Spatial crowdsourcing is performed offline, meaning that crowd contributors physically travel to target locations and carry out specific instructions. Below are some of the best known spatial crowdsourcing tasks and processes that support digital mapping by generating high-quality geo data.
To complete such field tasks, crowd contributors on the ground are provided with the area’s data, including any relevant plans and layouts, as well as the property’s address or GSC coordinates, which is known as the “input data.” The “output data” consists of enriched images with clearly marked entrances to the building.
To complete these tasks, contributors on the ground are given plans of the area along with any current business information available. After task completion, enriched maps will have updated information on existing companies and also fresh additions – either recently established businesses or previously unlisted entries.
Importantly, up-to-date information always contains so-called “attributes,” which is specific information pertaining to organizations. These may include working hours, links to company websites and social media, reviews by clients, as well as other features such as payment methods, wheelchair access, price range, or type of cuisine in the case of food establishments.
Crowd contributors tackling such field tasks are provided with the area’s maps along with any available information about existing objects contained therein. After visiting these locations in person and marking the objects accordingly, urban environment data will include updated images depicting all relevant items within the target area, as well as their precise coordinates/positioning.
Field task contributors are provided with specific prearranged routes that they have to follow and measure signal strength. After the task is complete (which normally takes 3-4 hours), system information on signals at set frequencies is transmitted from the contributors’ devices back to those who process it.
To deliver this information, feet-on-street contributors are given coordinates of shopping malls along with any existing floor plans if such are available. After 3-7 days (depending on the mall’s size and availability of information prior to the task), updated floor plans are usually ready to be assimilated into mapping services.
With these tasks, crowd contributors on the ground are given coordinates and asked to visit certain sites and take panoramic photos, usually with their phones. Each site requires around 400 data points to form a high-quality, cursor-draggable panoramic image for the end user. These data points normally come from multiple contributors and are put together via
Field task contributors in this case are provided with whatever directions are available, at which point they proceed to the site, take photos, and work out the best routes to the location. Subsequently, digital maps are updated with arrowed visual directions and/or descriptions of “best access” in the form of text.
This method works especially well in towns and cities with a population of up to 100+K in lieu of the standard street-view data collection vehicles. As a result, two important goals are achieved: (1) high-quality panoramic images of different travel routes and (2) more information about organizations in the area, including their names, addresses, and business categories (which supplements and enhances “updating and adding organizations” mentioned earlier that’s carried out on foot).
It works in the following way: crowd contributors (permanent or temporary inhabitants of city boroughs, districts, or neighborhoods) are asked to look at their physical thermometers to determine local temperature and also report on how it feels to them (i.e., “real feel”®). This is accompanied by additional multiple-choice questions that address specific climate features such as precipitation, wind, visibility, etc.
As we’ve seen, crowd-based methodologies work well to complement existing online mapping solutions, and they’re effective in data collection (particularly last-mile), data cleansing/comparison, and ultimately digital map enrichment. In our next article of the series, we’ll look into crowdsourcing from the perspective of brick-and-mortar retail – how crowd contributors can help make information more accurate and transparent for the end user, be it a customer or a proprietor.