Should Smart Contracts be Non-Turing Complete?by@noprofile
4,086 reads
4,086 reads

Should Smart Contracts be Non-Turing Complete?

by noprofile8mJuly 15th, 2019
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story w/o Javascript
tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

A paper from the Computer Science Institute at the University of Applied Science Ruhr West, in Germany, analyzed 53,575 smart contracts and analyzed the type coding flow within each type of coding. The paper identified the flow flow in each of these contracts because they were coded in Solidity. Solidity is a programming language that has security flaws that exist because it is a language that can be hacked to avoid the possibility of attacks. We’ll discuss Turing completeness, evaluate its usefulness in regard to smart contracts, and look at alternatives.

People Mentioned

Mention Thumbnail

Companies Mentioned

Mention Thumbnail
Mention Thumbnail

Coins Mentioned

Mention Thumbnail
Mention Thumbnail
featured image - Should Smart Contracts be Non-Turing Complete?
noprofile HackerNoon profile picture
noprofile

noprofile

@noprofile

This profile doesn't exist.

About @noprofile
LEARN MORE ABOUT @NOPROFILE'S
EXPERTISE AND PLACE ON THE INTERNET.

Share Your Thoughts

About Author

noprofile HackerNoon profile picture
noprofile@noprofile
This profile doesn't exist.

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN...

Permanent on Arweave
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story in a terminal
 Terminal
Read this story w/o Javascript
Read this story w/o Javascript
 Lite
L O A D I N G
. . . comments & more!