paint-brush
Sam Bankman-Fried Challenges Court's Sentencing Guidelinesby@legalpdf

Sam Bankman-Fried Challenges Court's Sentencing Guidelines

by Legal PDF: Tech Court CasesMarch 20th, 2024
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story w/o Javascript
tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

Sam Bankman-Fried's sentencing submission includes challenges to the Guidelines calculation, disputing enhancements for various actions. While most objections won't alter the offense level, legal analysis reveals their lack of merit and importance in the sentencing process.
featured image - Sam Bankman-Fried Challenges Court's Sentencing Guidelines
Legal PDF: Tech Court Cases HackerNoon profile picture

USA v. Samuel Bankman-Fried Court Filing, retrieved on March 15, 2024 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This part is 14 of 33.

II. The Defendant’s Challenges to the Guidelines Calculation Lack Merit

In his sentencing submission, the defendant makes several challenges to the Guidelines calculation set forth in the PSR. Specifically, he challenges the calculation of the loss amount, the enhancement for fraudulent action in the course of a bankruptcy proceeding, the enhancement for conduct outside of the United States, the gross receipts from a financial institution enhancement, the abuse of trust enhancement, and the obstruction of justice enhancement. While all of these objections lack merit, it bears noting that with the exception of his challenge to the loss amount, none of his other objections will affect the calculation of the total offense level, which would be 43 with or without those enhancements. However, even though the objections are immaterial to the calculation of the Guidelines, the defendant is wrong on the facts and the law, and in any event the Court should consider the conduct underlying the enhancement in imposing a sentence.



Continue Reading Here.


About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.


This court case retrieved on March 15, 2024, from storage.courtlistener is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.