The latest ECMA standard for JavaScript (ECMAScript 6) makes JavaScript more readable by encouraging a more declarative style with functional constructs and new operators.
One of my favourite ES6 features is destructuring. It allows you to extract data from one variable to another by using structure. For arrays this means for example:
var [ first, second ] = [ 1, 2, 3, 4 ];// first: 1// second: 2
There’s more you can do, like skip some members of the array on the right-hand side of the operation.
var [ first, , third, fourth ] = [ 1, 2, 3, 4 ];// first: 1// third: 3// fourth: 4
This is actually quite easily back-ported to the equivalent ES5
var arr = [ 1, 2, 3, 4 ];var first = arr[0];var second = arr[1];// etc ...
This is where ES6 features become more interesting. With destructuring we can also assign what is called the rest of the array. We indicate rest with the ...
notation.
var [ first, ...notFirst ] = [ 1, 2, 3, 4 ];// first: 1// notFirst: [ 2, 3, 4 ]
Naming conventions lead to code that is more akin to the following:
var [ first, second, ...rest ] = [ 1, 2, 3, 4 ]// first: 1// second: 2// rest: [ 3, 4 ]
The rest
operator has some interesting properties:
var [ first, ...rest ] = [ 1 ]// first: 1// rest: []
It always returns an array. Which means even in defensive JavaScript land, it’s ok to do things like check .length
of rest
without guards.
The equivalent in ES5 (and below) is to use theArray.slice
function.
var arr = [ 1, 2, 3, 4 ];var first = arr[0];var rest = arr.slice(1);// first: 1// rest: [ 2, 3, 4 ]
Two things to note here:
Now I also think that the structure-matching version (with rest) is more readable.
We can use destructuring on the parameters of a function definition:
function something([ first, ...rest ]) {return {first: first,rest: rest};}var result = something([1, 2, 3]);// result: { first: 1, rest: [ 2,3 ] }
Equivalent ES5:
function something(arr){var first = arr[0];var rest = arr.slice(1);return {first: first,rest: rest};}
Again it’s more verbose and more imperative.
Spread uses the same notation as rest: ...
. What it does is quite different.
var arr = [ 1, 2, 3 ];var newArr = [ ...arr ];// newArr: [ 1, 2, 3]
ES5 equivalent:
var arr = [ 1, 2, 3 ];var newArr = [].concat(arr);
Things to note, the contents of the array are copied. So newArr
is not a reference to arr
.
We can also do things like appending or prepending an array.
var arr = [ 1, 2, 3] ;
var withPrepend = [ ...arr, 3, 2, 1];var withAppend = [ 3, 2, 1, ...arr ];// withPrepend: [ 1, 2, 3, 3, 2, 1]// withAppend: [ 3, 2, 1, 1, 2, 3 ]
In functional programming when we run functions recursively over lists we like to model the list as a head and a tail.
The head is the first element of the list, the tail is the list composed of the list minus the head.
arr = [ 1, 2, 3 ]// head(arr): 1// tail(arr): [ 2, 3 ]
In ES6 we can do this just by naming the variable appropriately with destructuring and rest:
var [ head, ...tail ] = [ 1, 2, 3 ];// head: 1// tail: [ 2, 3 ]
We can also trivially implement the head
and tail
functions using ES6:
function head([ head, ...tail ]) {return head;}function tail([ head, ...tail ]) {return tail;}// or with arrow function syntaxvar head = ([ head, ...tail ]) => head;var tail = ([ head, ...tail ]) => tail;
We can implement functions that operate over arrays (or lists as they tend to be called in functional programming) using parameter destructuring and recursion.
For example, map can be implemented in the following manner:
Map is a function that takes a list and a function and returns a list containing the result of a function application to each element of the list.
function map([ head, ...tail ], fn) {if(head === undefined && !tail.length) return [];if(tail.length === 0){return [ fn(head) ];}return [ fn(head) ].concat(map(tail, fn));}
The tail.length === 0
checks whether there is still a tail to recurse over. Otherwise, the recursion stops there.
This is not necessarily the most efficient version of map both in terms of memory usage and speed but it’s a good illustration of ES6.
We can further simplify it by replacing concat
with the spread
operator and using a single return statement with a ternary operator.
Our ES6 recursive/destructuring map can be simplified to:
Or if we want to abuse ES6 and allow ourselves to forget that we’re actually doing JavaScript:
ES5 equivalent
All the features add up and while recursive map in ES6 is essentially a one-liner, in ES5 it’s a clunky, long, hard to read function.
Now you can have a go at reimplementing filter
, reduce
and join
using the above techniques.
Solutions below the fold :).
ES6 allows us to write code in a functional style more tersely and effectively.
Give some 💚 to this post if you liked it and to follow for more JavaScript-related things.
You can find me on Twitter(at)hugo__df, on GitHub as HugoDF, there are more JavaScript gists here.
Hacker Noon is how hackers start their afternoons. We’re a part of the @AMIfamily. We are now accepting submissions and happy to discuss advertising &sponsorship opportunities.
To learn more, read our about page, like/message us on Facebook, or simply, tweet/DM @HackerNoon.
If you enjoyed this story, we recommend reading our latest tech stories and trending tech stories. Until next time, don’t take the realities of the world for granted!