Testing React components gives you confidence the component will work when the user interacts with it. As a junior full-stack developer on my first job, I found it extremely useful in helping me understand our current codebase as well as allowing me to add value while learning. This article is a summary of the information I found useful during my research and the answer to some challenges I came across. I don't hope to re-invent the wheel but to help others in a similar stage of their career. It's also assumed that you have some experience in writing tests. Why and ? Jest RTL (React Testing Library) React openly recommends Jest as a test runner (perhaps because they maintain it) and RTL as their testing utility of choice. Jest is very fast, easy to set up and it has many powerful features such as mocking functions which allow you to replace a specific function and return a desirable value or to check how the test subject it’s executing the function. RTL is very simple to set up, easy to make queries (including asynchronously) and because of how it was built, it will help you write good tests. is not required but makes writing tests much easier because it will extend Jest matchers (methods that let you test values in different ways (e.g. , ), and allow you to write clearer tests. Jest-Dom toBe() toHaveBeenCalled() Another popular tool is , but many believe that it can lead to bad testing practices. The main concern is that Enzyme offers extra utilities that allow you to test the internal workings of a component (e.g. read and set state of the component). The team at React tests React; therefore, there is no need for you to test React’s functionality such as state, , etc. The same goes for other libraries you may use. Enzyme componentDidMount What to test? When testing React components, the focus should be on replicating how the user would interact with the React component. This means that we should test for what the user should see or not see, and how they are meant to interact with the app once it renders (e.g. the value of search/input field can be changed) instead of testing implementation (e.g. was called x number of times). componentDidMount Some good questions to ask yourself when writing tests are: What does the component render? Also, does it render differently under different conditions? This is what the user will see and potentially interact with. By thinking about it, you will also realise that users should access and see different information depending on certain conditions being met What happens when the user interacts with the component? These are the parts of the app which the user will click, write into, etc. and they’ll expect something to happen. Whatever is meant to happen, needs to be tested that happens when the event is triggered! When a function is passed in as a prop, how does the component use it? You may need to recreate the behaviour of this function by using Jest’s mocking concept to know if the function has been called and the correct values were used How to write a test? RTL’s most used functions are – renders the component, – unmounts React DOM tree that were mounted with and – to fire events like a click. render cleanup render fireEvent Jest most used functions are along with a matcher. will allow you to mock a function directly, to mock an object method and for an entire module. expect jest.fn() jest.spyOn() jest.mock() The test should be structured as follows: Declare all / / with or without mocked implementations jest.fn() spyOn() mock() Call RTL’s function with the test subject as an argument – provide context whenever the component consumes a context. Also, if React-Router Link is used in this component, an object with a property wrapper and value MemoryRouter (imported from React-Router) must be passed as the second argument. Optionally wrap the component in MemoryRouter tags render Query the React DOM tree by using RTL’s query functions (e.g. ) and check the values by call getByRole() Check values queried by calling along with the relevant matcher. To replicate user interaction use expect() fireEvent RTL also returns a method when render is called. Debug is fantastic for checking what is rendered in the React tree for situations like debugging your tests. debug() We will use the code below (a search field) as our example of a React component: render = { {
    validateSelection,
    minCharacters,
    placeholder,
    inputFluid,
    inputLabel,
    clear
  }: any = .props { isLoading, value, results } = .state icon = validateSelection ? ( <Icon name="search" />
  )

  return (
    <Search
      minCharacters={minCharacters}
      loading={isLoading}
      icon={icon}
      onResultSelect={this.onResultSelect}
      onSearchChange={this.onSearchChange}
      results={results}
      value={clear ? null : value}
      fluid
      placeholder={placeholder}
      input={{ fluid: inputFluid, label: inputLabel }}
    />
  )
} => () const this const this const ) : ( < = = /> Icon name "check" color "green" Above we are destructuring props and state. We are also returning a Semantic UI React module. In essence, the above will render an input field. When changed, it will call and Semantic UI React will automatically pass two arguments, and (all props, including current value). One of ’s jobs is to call an API and return results that match the current value. Search onSearchChange event data onSearchChange Below are the tests we built for this component. React { render, cleanup, fireEvent } SearchField afterEach(cleanup)
jest.useFakeTimers()

test( , () => { handleResultSelectMock = jest.fn() apiServiceMock = jest
    .fn()
    .mockImplementation( .resolve({ : { : , : [ , ] } })
    ) { getByRole, debug } = render( import '@testing-library/jest-dom/extend-expect' import from 'react' import from '@testing-library/react' import from './SearchField' '<SearchField />' const const => () Promise entity success true data 'hello' 'adios' const )

  const input = getByRole('textbox')
  expect(apiServiceMock).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
  expect(input).toHaveValue('')

  fireEvent.change(input, { target: { value: 'search' } })
  expect(input).toHaveValue('search')
  jest.advanceTimersByTime(600)

  expect(apiServiceMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith('search')
  expect(apiServiceMock).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
  debug()
}) < = = /> SearchField handleResultSelect {handleResultSelectMock} apiService {apiServiceMock} What is happening in the example above? We imported all dependencies needed to test this component. Jest DOM - to extend jest matchers , , - React Testing Library utilities render cleanup fireEvent - the React component being tested SearchField React { render, cleanup, fireEvent } SearchField import '@testing-library/jest-dom/extend-expect' import from 'react' import from '@testing-library/react' import from './SearchField' We called Jest's function and passed RTL's method as an argument. cleanup will make sure that there are no memory leaks between tests by unmounting everything mounted by RTL's method. We also called Jest's hook to mock timer functions. afterEach cleanup render useFakeTimers afterEach(cleanup)
jest.useFakeTimers() The component requires two props which should be functions. Therefore, we started by mocking two functions that will be passed to the component as props - and . will be passed to and to . Then, RTL's method is called with SearchField component as the argument. handleResultSelectMock apiServiceMock handleResultSelectMock handleResultSelect apiServiceMock apiService render test( , () => { handleResultSelectMock = jest.fn() apiServiceMock = jest
    .fn()
    .mockImplementation( .resolve({ : { : , : [ , ] } })
    ) { getByRole, debug } = render( '<SearchField />' const const => () Promise entity success true data 'hello' 'adios' const )
}) < = = /> SearchField handleResultSelect {handleResultSelectMock} apiService {apiServiceMock} There will be times when the component being tested will require a or a to render successfully. See the example below: wrapper: Memory Router context { getByTestId, container } = render( <MainLoggedIn
      config={{
        get: jest.fn().mockImplementation(() => ({
          globalMenu: [{ requiredPermissions: ['Navbar'] }]
        }))
      }}
      history={{ history: ['first_history', 'second_history'] }}
      children={['first_child', 'second_child']}
    />
  </UserContext.Provider>,
  { wrapper: MemoryRouter }
) const < = > UserContext.Provider value {context} After is called, we should query the React DOM tree and find the elements we want to test. Below we used , but RTL offers many other query selectors functions. render getByRole input = getByRole( ) const 'textbox' To check values, start with the function along one of the several matchers. Here we started by checking that the apiServiceMock has been called, then checks that the input field is empty ( ) when the component first renders. expect not value = '' expect(apiServiceMock).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
expect(input).toHaveValue( ) '' An event is fired using the function of RTL's to replicate the user's behaviour. This event will update the value of the input field from to . You can replicate other scenarios by using other methods such as , . Jest's method is called to move the mocked timer forward by 600ms hence the number 600 is passed as an argument. makes sure that tasks that have been queued by a timer function and would be executed within the given time (600ms in this case) will be executed. change fireEvent '' 'search' fireEvent click() mouseOver() advanceTimersByTime advanceTimersByTime fireEvent.change(input, { : { : } })
expect(input).toHaveValue( )
jest.advanceTimersByTime( ) target value 'search' 'search' 600 After firing the event, we expect a few things to happen, the function to be called once, and the argument passed to to match the current input's value. apiServiceMock apiServiceMock expect(apiServiceMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith( )
expect(apiServiceMock).toHaveBeenCalledTimes( )
debug() 'search' 1 Lastly, the function is called to check what is rendered in the React tree and help debug the tests. debug Summary Small and straightforward tests are better. Test each component independently. Focus on testing what the user will see and how they will interact with the component. Start building the tests after assessing what needs to be tested. More on the topic Jest cheat sheet Modern React testing, part 3: Jest and React Testing Library The Right Way to Test React Components React Testing Library - Introduction Configuring Jest Mock Functions or Spies Demystified - How Does Work? jest.fn() Previously published at https://jdlt.co.uk/blog/testing-react-components-with-jest-and-react-testing-library/

Target

2022 - HackerNoon Contributor of the Year - Data Security

2022 - HackerNoon Contributor of the Year - Password Security

2022 - HackerNoon Contributor of the Year - Software Testing

Custom software & Managed IT

Nominated for 2022 - HackerNoon Contributor of the Year - Software Testing

Nominated for 2022 - HackerNoon Contributor of the Year - Data Security

Nominated for 2022 - HackerNoon Contributor of the Year - Password Security

Too Long; Didn't Read

In your car, at home, or at work — Bosch technology shapes many areas of life.

React Component Testing Guide: Jest and RTL

React Component Testing Guide: Jest and RTL

Too Long; Didn't Read

Company Mentioned

JDLT

About Author

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN...

React Component Testing Guide: Jest and RTL

Too Long; Didn't Read

Company Mentioned

JDLT

About Author

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN...

RELATED STORIES