US v. Bankman-Fried, 22-cr-673 Court Filing, Dec 13 2022 is part of . You can jump to any part in this filing . This is part 7 of 9. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here Feature Image: HackerNoon’s Stable Diffusion AI, Prompt “money laundering” COUNT SEVEN: Conspiracy to Commit Money Laundering The Grand Jury further charges: From at least in or about 2020, up to and including in or about November 2022, in the Southern District of New York, and elsewhere, ‘SAMUEL BANKMAN-FRIED, a/k/a “SBF,” the defendant, and others known and unknown, intentionally and knowingly did combine, conspire, confederate, and agree together and with each other to violate Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1956 (a) (1) (B) (i) and 1957(a). It was a part and an object of the conspiracy that SAMUEL BANKMAN-FRIED, a/k/a “SBF,” the defendant, and others known and unknown, in an offense in and affecting interstate and foreign commerce, knowing that the property involved in a financial transaction, to wit, one or more monetary transfers, represented the proceeds of some form of unlawful activity, would and did conduct and attempt to conduct such a financial transaction, which in fact involved the proceeds of specified unlawful activity, to wit, the wire fraud alleged in Count Two of this Indictment, knowing that the transaction was designed in whole and in part to conceal and disguise the nature, the location, the source, the ownership, and the control of the proceeds of specified unlawful activity, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1956 (a) (1) (B) (i). It was a further part and an object of the conspiracy that SAMUEL BANKMAN-FRIED, a/k/a “SBF,” the defendant, and others known and unknown, within the United States, would and did knowingly engage and attempt to engage in a monetary transaction in criminally derived property of a value greater than $10,000 and that was derived from specified unlawful activity, to wit, the wire fraud alleged in Count Two of this Indictment, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1957(a). (Title 18, United States Code, Section 1956 (h).) Continue Reading Here About We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: This court case (US v. Bankman-Fried, 22-cr-673 (Abrams), on Dec 15 2022) is part of the public domain. The court-created documents provided by PACER are works of the federal government, and under , are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. retrieved copyright law

In Plain English: SBF did not just embezzle, he bribed politicians, per Grand Jury's Charges

Securities Fraud Allegation against SBF, the disgraced ex-CEO of FTX

Too Long; Didn't Read

Boost your HackerNoon story @ $159.99! 🚀

The SEC alleged that SBF not only committed several frauds but also attempt to money launder #oops

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Untitled Story

20% of All General Searches in the U.S. Go Through the Default on User-Downloaded Version of Chrome

4 silos, 103 subsidiaries, 13 entities in-debt: That is the Corporate Structure of FTX

According to SBF, Binance CEO CZ caused the bank run & never intended to acquire FTX

Alameda Loaned 1 Billion to Sam Bankman-Fried and 2.3 Billion to 'Paper Bird Inc' (aka SBF also)

At SBF's direction, Caroline materially misled investors that Alameda was fine. It was not.

20% of All General Searches in the U.S. Go Through the Default on User-Downloaded Version of Chrome

4 silos, 103 subsidiaries, 13 entities in-debt: That is the Corporate Structure of FTX

According to SBF, Binance CEO CZ caused the bank run & never intended to acquire FTX

Alameda Loaned 1 Billion to Sam Bankman-Fried and 2.3 Billion to 'Paper Bird Inc' (aka SBF also)

At SBF's direction, Caroline materially misled investors that Alameda was fine. It was not.

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps