US v. Bankman-Fried, 22-cr-673 Court Filing, Dec 13 2022 is part of . You can jump to any part in this filing . This is part 5 of 9. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here COUNT FIVE: Conspiracy to Commit Commodities Fraud The Grand Jury further charges: From at least in or about 2013, up to and including in or about November 2022, in the Southern District of New York, and elsewhere, SAMUEL BANKMAN-FRIED, a/k/a SBF,” the defendant, and others known and unknown, willfully and knowingly did combine, conspire, confederate, and agree together and with each other to commit an offense against the United States, to wit, commodities fraud, in violation of Title 7, United States Code, Sections 9(1) and 13(a) (5), and Title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 180.1. It was a part and an object of the conspiracy that SAMUEL BANKMAN-FRIED, a/k/a “SBF,” the defendant, and others known and unknown, willfully and knowingly, would and did, directly and indirectly, use and employ, and attempt to use and employ, in connection with a swap, a contract of sale of a commodity in interstate commerce, and for future delivery on and subject to the rules of a registered entity, a manipulative and deceptive device and contrivance, in contravention of Title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 180.1, by: (a) using and employing, and attempting to use and employ, a manipulative device, scheme, and artifice to defraud; (b) making, and attempting to make, an untrue and misleading statement of a material fact and omitting to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made not untrue and misleading; and (c) engaging, and attempting to engage in an act, practice, and course of business, which operated and would operate as a fraud and deceit upon a person, in violation of Title 7, United States Code, Sections 9(1) and 13(a) (5), to wit, BANKMAN-FRIED agreed with others to defraud customers of trading or intending to trade swaps by misappropriating those customers’ deposits and using those deposits to pay expenses and debts of Alameda Research, BANKMAN-FRIED's proprietary crypto hedge fund, and to make investments. FTX.com In furtherance of the conspiracy and to effect the illegal object thereof, the following overt act, among others, was committed in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere: in or about June 2022, SAMUEL BANKMAN-FRIED, a/k/a “SBF,” the defendant, and others misappropriated customer deposits in order to, among other things, satisfy loan obligations owed by Alameda Research. FTX.com (Title 18, United States Code, Section 371.) Continue Reading Here About We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: This court case (US v. Bankman-Fried, 22-cr-673 (Abrams), retrieved on Dec 15 2022 from ) is part of the public domain. The court-created documents provided by PACER are works of the federal government, and under , are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. DOCUMENT CLOUD copyright law

Too Long; Didn't Read

Questions about cloud security? Get answers here.

Grand Jury charges SBF with Conspiracy to Commit Commodities Fraud

Too Long; Didn't Read

People Mentioned

Legal PDF

About Author

TOPICS

Languages

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN...

Grand Jury charges SBF with Conspiracy to Commit Commodities Fraud

Too Long; Didn't Read

People Mentioned

About Author

TOPICS

Languages

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN...

RELATED STORIES