paint-brush
Musk tried to formally terminate deal, accusing Twitter of sharing fake databy@legalpdf
210 reads

Musk tried to formally terminate deal, accusing Twitter of sharing fake data

by Legal PDF: Tech Court Cases
Legal PDF: Tech Court Cases HackerNoon profile picture

Legal PDF: Tech Court Cases

@legalpdf

Legal PDFs of important tech court cases are far too...

November 24th, 2022
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story in a terminal
Print this story
Read this story w/o Javascript
Read this story w/o Javascript

Too Long; Didn't Read

Twitter v. Elon Musk Court Filing July 12, 2022 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. Part 23 of 31: .FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS- Defendants purport to terminate the merger agreement

People Mentioned

Mention Thumbnail

@legalpdf

Mention Thumbnail

Elon Musk

@elonmusk007

Company Mentioned

Mention Thumbnail
Twitter
featured image - Musk tried to formally terminate deal, accusing Twitter of sharing fake data
1x
Read by Dr. One voice-avatar

Listen to this story

Legal PDF: Tech Court Cases HackerNoon profile picture
Legal PDF: Tech Court Cases

Legal PDF: Tech Court Cases

@legalpdf

Legal PDFs of important tech court cases are far too inaccessible for the average reader... until now.

About @legalpdf
LEARN MORE ABOUT @LEGALPDF'S
EXPERTISE AND PLACE ON THE INTERNET.

Twitter v. Elon Musk Court Filing by Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, July 12, 2022 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This is part 23 of 31.

Feature Image: HackerNoon’s Midjourney AI, Prompt “Boy Cry Wolf"


FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

VIII. Defendants purport to terminate the merger agreement


123. On July 8, 2022, defendants’ counsel sent a letter to Twitter purporting to terminate the merger agreement.


124. The notice alleges three grounds for termination: (i) purported breach of the information-sharing and cooperation covenants contained in Sections 6.4 and 6.11; (ii) supposed “materially inaccurate representations” incorporated by reference in the merger agreement that allegedly are “reasonably likely to result in” a Company Material Adverse Effect; and (iii) purported failure to comply with the ordinary course covenant by terminating certain employees, slowing hiring, and failing to retain key personnel. Ex. 3. 125. These accusations are pretextual and have no merit.


Continue reading here


L O A D I N G
. . . comments & more!

About Author

Legal PDF: Tech Court Cases HackerNoon profile picture
Legal PDF: Tech Court Cases@legalpdf
Legal PDFs of important tech court cases are far too inaccessible for the average reader... until now.

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN...

Permanent on Arweave
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story in a terminal
 Terminal
Read this story w/o Javascript
Read this story w/o Javascript
 Lite
Learnrepo
Coffee-web
Learnrepo

Mentioned in this story

companies
profiles
X REMOVE AD