Elon Musk v OpenAI, Court Filing, retrieved on August 05, 2024, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part of this filing here. This is the table of links with all parts. Case Number: 3:24-cv-04722 Plaintiffs: Elon Musk Defendant: OpenAI Filing Date: August 05, 2024 Location: United States District Court Northern District of California Table of Content Nature of the Action Parties Jurisdiction, Venue, and Divisional Assignment FACTS COMMON TO ALL CLAIMS FOR RELIEF A. The Dangers of Artificial Intelligence B. Altman Induces Musk to Back OpenAI, Inc. C. Musk’s Crucial Contributions to OpenAI, Inc. D. Defendants Seek to Convert OpenAI, Inc. For Profit E. Microsoft’s Involvement F. Defendants Craft Their Path to Profit G. Defendants Renege in 2023 H. Defendants Seize then Neuter OpenAI, Inc.’s Board I. OpenAI Today COUNT I: PROMISSORY FRAUD (Against Altman, Brockman, and OpenAI, Inc.) COUNT II: CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD (Against Altman, Brockman, and OpenAI, Inc.) COUNT III: AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD (Against the OpenAI For-Profit Entities) COUNT IV: VIOLATIONS OF FEDERAL CIVIL RICO, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) COUNT V: CONSPIRACY TO VIOLATE FEDERAL CIVIL RICO, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d) (Against Altman, Brockman, and the OpenAI For-Profit Entities) COUNT VI: BREACH OF EXPRESS CONTRACT (Against Altman and OpenAI, Inc.) COUNT VII: BREACH OF IMPLIED-IN-FACT CONTRACT (In the alternative to Count VI) (Against Altman and OpenAI, Inc.) COUNT VIII: BREACH OF IMPLIED COVENANT OF GOOD FAITH AND FAIR DEALING (Against Altman and OpenAI, Inc.) COUNT IX: BREACH OF QUASI-CONTRACT/UNJUST ENRICHMENT (In the alternative to Counts VI, VII, and VIII) (Against All Defendants) COUNT X: FALSE ADVERTISING UNDER THE LANHAM ACT, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)(1)(B) (Against Altman, Brockman, and OpenAI, Inc.) COUNT XI: UNFAIR COMPETITION UNDER CALIFORNIA BUSINESS & PROFESSIONS CODE §§ 17200 et seq. (Against All Defendants) COUNT XII: FALSE ADVERTISING UNDER CALIFORNIA BUSINESS & PROFESSIONS CODE §§ 17500 et seq. (Against Altman, Brockman, and OpenAI, Inc.) COUNT XIII: AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (Against the OpenAI For-Profit Entities) COUNT XIV: TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE WITH CONTRACT (Against the OpenAI For-Profit Entities) COUNT XV: DECLARATORY RELIEF (Against All Defendants) Prayer for Relief Demand For Jury Trial About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.
This court case retrieved on August 05, 2024, deadline.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. Elon Musk v OpenAI, Court Filing, retrieved on August 05, 2024, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part of this filing here. This is the table of links with all parts. Elon Musk v OpenAI, Court Filing, retrieved on August 05, 2024, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series . You can jump to any part of this filing here . This is the table of links with all parts. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here Case Number: 3:24-cv-04722 Case Number: Plaintiffs: Elon Musk Plaintiffs: Defendant: OpenAI Defendant: Filing Date: August 05, 2024 Filing Date: Location: United States District Court Northern District of California Location: Table of Content Nature of the Action Nature of the Action Parties Parties Jurisdiction, Venue, and Divisional Assignment Jurisdiction, Venue, and Divisional Assignment FACTS COMMON TO ALL CLAIMS FOR RELIEF FACTS COMMON TO ALL CLAIMS FOR RELIEF A. The Dangers of Artificial Intelligence A. The Dangers of Artificial Intelligence B. Altman Induces Musk to Back OpenAI, Inc. B. Altman Induces Musk to Back OpenAI, Inc. C. Musk’s Crucial Contributions to OpenAI, Inc. C. Musk’s Crucial Contributions to OpenAI, Inc. D. Defendants Seek to Convert OpenAI, Inc. For Profit D. Defendants Seek to Convert OpenAI, Inc. For Profit E. Microsoft’s Involvement E. Microsoft’s Involvement F. Defendants Craft Their Path to Profit F. Defendants Craft Their Path to Profit G. Defendants Renege in 2023 G. Defendants Renege in 2023 H. Defendants Seize then Neuter OpenAI, Inc.’s Board H. Defendants Seize then Neuter OpenAI, Inc.’s Board I. OpenAI Today I. OpenAI Today COUNT I: PROMISSORY FRAUD (Against Altman, Brockman, and OpenAI, Inc.) COUNT I: COUNT I: PROMISSORY FRAUD (Against Altman, Brockman, and OpenAI, Inc.) COUNT II: CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD (Against Altman, Brockman, and OpenAI, Inc.) COUNT II: COUNT II: CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD (Against Altman, Brockman, and OpenAI, Inc.) COUNT III: AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD (Against the OpenAI For-Profit Entities) COUNT III: COUNT III: AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD (Against the OpenAI For-Profit Entities) COUNT IV: VIOLATIONS OF FEDERAL CIVIL RICO, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) COUNT IV: COUNT IV: VIOLATIONS OF FEDERAL CIVIL RICO, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) COUNT V: CONSPIRACY TO VIOLATE FEDERAL CIVIL RICO, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d) (Against Altman, Brockman, and the OpenAI For-Profit Entities) COUNT V: COUNT V: CONSPIRACY TO VIOLATE FEDERAL CIVIL RICO, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d) (Against Altman, Brockman, and the OpenAI For-Profit Entities) COUNT VI: BREACH OF EXPRESS CONTRACT (Against Altman and OpenAI, Inc.) COUNT VI: COUNT VI: BREACH OF EXPRESS CONTRACT (Against Altman and OpenAI, Inc.) COUNT VII: BREACH OF IMPLIED-IN-FACT CONTRACT (In the alternative to Count VI) (Against Altman and OpenAI, Inc.) COUNT VII: COUNT VII: BREACH OF IMPLIED-IN-FACT CONTRACT (In the alternative to Count VI) (Against Altman and OpenAI, Inc.) COUNT VIII: BREACH OF IMPLIED COVENANT OF GOOD FAITH AND FAIR DEALING (Against Altman and OpenAI, Inc.) COUNT VIII: COUNT VIII: BREACH OF IMPLIED COVENANT OF GOOD FAITH AND FAIR DEALING (Against Altman and OpenAI, Inc.) COUNT IX: BREACH OF QUASI-CONTRACT/UNJUST ENRICHMENT (In the alternative to Counts VI, VII, and VIII) (Against All Defendants) COUNT IX: COUNT IX: BREACH OF QUASI-CONTRACT/UNJUST ENRICHMENT (In the alternative to Counts VI, VII, and VIII) (Against All Defendants) COUNT X: FALSE ADVERTISING UNDER THE LANHAM ACT, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)(1)(B) (Against Altman, Brockman, and OpenAI, Inc.) COUNT X: COUNT X: FALSE ADVERTISING UNDER THE LANHAM ACT, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)(1)(B) (Against Altman, Brockman, and OpenAI, Inc.) COUNT XI: UNFAIR COMPETITION UNDER CALIFORNIA BUSINESS & PROFESSIONS CODE §§ 17200 et seq. (Against All Defendants) COUNT XI: COUNT XI: UNFAIR COMPETITION UNDER CALIFORNIA BUSINESS & PROFESSIONS CODE §§ 17200 et seq. (Against All Defendants) COUNT XII: FALSE ADVERTISING UNDER CALIFORNIA BUSINESS & PROFESSIONS CODE §§ 17500 et seq. (Against Altman, Brockman, and OpenAI, Inc.) COUNT XII: COUNT XII: FALSE ADVERTISING UNDER CALIFORNIA BUSINESS & PROFESSIONS CODE §§ 17500 et seq. (Against Altman, Brockman, and OpenAI, Inc.) COUNT XIII: AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (Against the OpenAI For-Profit Entities) COUNT XIII: COUNT XIII: AIDING AND ABETTING BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (Against the OpenAI For-Profit Entities) COUNT XIV: TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE WITH CONTRACT (Against the OpenAI For-Profit Entities) COUNT XIV: COUNT XIV: TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE WITH CONTRACT (Against the OpenAI For-Profit Entities) COUNT XV: DECLARATORY RELIEF (Against All Defendants) COUNT XV: COUNT XV: DECLARATORY RELIEF (Against All Defendants) Prayer for Relief Prayer for Relief Demand For Jury Trial Demand For Jury Trial About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case retrieved on August 05, 2024, deadline.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case retrieved on August 05, 2024, deadline.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. deadline.com

Meet the Plaintiffs in the United States v Google Antitrust Lawsuit

Musk Fires at Sam Altman and Associates for Turning OpenAI into Their ''Personal Piggy Bank''

Too Long; Didn't Read

Boost your HackerNoon story @ $159.99! 🚀

Musk: OpenAI's Transition from Non-Profit to For-Profit a Calculated "Long Con"

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Untitled Story

20% of All General Searches in the U.S. Go Through the Default on User-Downloaded Version of Chrome

Musk Calls OpenAI’s Shift to For-Profit a ‘Long Con’ for Personal Gain

Elon Musk's Lawsuit Unveils OpenAI’s Complex Corporate Network

Jurisdiction and Venue in Musk's OpenAI Suit

Musk: OpenAI Betrayed the Promise of Safe AI

20% of All General Searches in the U.S. Go Through the Default on User-Downloaded Version of Chrome

Musk Calls OpenAI’s Shift to For-Profit a ‘Long Con’ for Personal Gain

Elon Musk's Lawsuit Unveils OpenAI’s Complex Corporate Network

Jurisdiction and Venue in Musk's OpenAI Suit

Musk: OpenAI Betrayed the Promise of Safe AI

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps