paint-brush
Meet the Plaintiffs in the United States v Google Antitrust Lawsuitby@legalpdf

Meet the Plaintiffs in the United States v Google Antitrust Lawsuit

by Legal PDF: Tech Court CasesAugust 9th, 2024
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story w/o Javascript
tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

1. The United States of America, acting at the direction of the Attorney General of the United States, and the States of Arkansas, California, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, South Carolina, Texas, and Wisconsin (Plaintiffs) brought this action under Section 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2, to restrain Google LLC from unlawfully maintaining monopolies in the markets for general search services, search advertising (Search Ads), and general search text advertising (Text Ads) in the United States through anticompetitive and exclusionary practices, and to remedy the effects of this conduct. Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint, ECF. No. 94, at 2–3.
featured image - Meet the Plaintiffs in the United States v Google Antitrust Lawsuit
Legal PDF: Tech Court Cases HackerNoon profile picture

United States of America v. Google LLC., Court Filing, retrieved on April 30, 2024, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part of this filing here. This part is 3 of 37.

A. The Plaintiffs

1. The United States of America, acting at the direction of the Attorney General of the United States, and the States of Arkansas, California, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, South Carolina, Texas, and Wisconsin (Plaintiffs) brought this action under Section 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2, to restrain Google LLC from unlawfully maintaining monopolies in the markets for general search services, search advertising (Search Ads), and general search text advertising (Text Ads) in the United States through anticompetitive and exclusionary practices, and to remedy the effects of this conduct. Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint, ECF. No. 94, at 2–3.


2. In addition, 38 other States and jurisdictions (the “Plaintiff States”) filed a separate action that incorporates the allegations in the DOJ Amended Complaint, while presenting additional factual allegations of unlawful monopoly maintenance by Google in the relevant markets. Case No. 20-cv-03715, ECF No. 1.


The Plaintiff States are: Colorado, Nebraska, Arizona, Iowa, New York, North Carolina, Tennessee, Utah, Alaska, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, and Wyoming.



Continue Reading Here.


About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.


This court case retrieved on April 30, 2024, storage.courtlistener is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.