The New York Times Company v. OpenAI Update Court Filing, retrieved on February 26, 2024 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This is the table of links with all parts. Case Number: 1:23-cv-11195-SHS Plaintiffs: The New York Times Company Defendant: OpenAI Update Filing Date: February 26, 2024 Location: United States District Court Southern District of New York TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION II. BACKGROUND A. OpenAI’s Pioneering Research B. The Key to Generalist Language Models: Scale C. Reliance on Longstanding Fair Use Principles D. GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 E. OpenAI’s API and ChatGPT F. The Times Files Suit G. The Times Focuses on Two Fringe Behaviors: Regurgitation & Hallucination III. LEGAL STANDARD IV. ARGUMENT A. The Times Cannot Sue for Conduct Occurring More than Three Years Ago B. The Complaint Fails to State a Contributory Infringement Claim C. The DMCA Claim Fails for Multiple Independent Reasons D. The “Misappropriation” Claim Is Preempted by the Copyright Act V. CONCLUSION About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case retrieved on February 26, 2024, from fingfx.thomsonreuters.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. The New York Times Company v. OpenAI Update Court Filing, retrieved on February 26, 2024 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This is the table of links with all parts. The New York Times Company v. OpenAI Update Court Filing, retrieved on February 26, 2024 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series . You can jump to any part in this filing here . This is the table of links with all parts. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here Case Number: 1:23-cv-11195-SHS Case Number: Plaintiffs: The New York Times Company Plaintiffs: Defendant: OpenAI Update Defendant: Filing Date: February 26, 2024 Filing Date: Location: United States District Court Southern District of New York Location: TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION I. INTRODUCTION I. INTRODUCTION II. BACKGROUND II. BACKGROUND A. OpenAI’s Pioneering Research A. OpenAI’s Pioneering Research B. The Key to Generalist Language Models: Scale B. The Key to Generalist Language Models: Scale C. Reliance on Longstanding Fair Use Principles C. Reliance on Longstanding Fair Use Principles D. GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 D. GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 E. OpenAI’s API and ChatGPT E. OpenAI’s API and ChatGPT F. The Times Files Suit F. The Times Files Suit G. The Times Focuses on Two Fringe Behaviors: Regurgitation & Hallucination G. The Times Focuses on Two Fringe Behaviors: Regurgitation & Hallucination III. LEGAL STANDARD III. LEGAL STANDARD III. LEGAL STANDARD IV. ARGUMENT IV. ARGUMENT IV. ARGUMENT A. The Times Cannot Sue for Conduct Occurring More than Three Years Ago A. The Times Cannot Sue for Conduct Occurring More than Three Years Ago B. The Complaint Fails to State a Contributory Infringement Claim B. The Complaint Fails to State a Contributory Infringement Claim C. The DMCA Claim Fails for Multiple Independent Reasons C. The DMCA Claim Fails for Multiple Independent Reasons D. The “Misappropriation” Claim Is Preempted by the Copyright Act D. The “Misappropriation” Claim Is Preempted by the Copyright Act V. CONCLUSION V. CONCLUSION V. CONCLUSION About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case retrieved on February 26, 2024, from fingfx.thomsonreuters.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case retrieved on February 26, 2024, from fingfx.thomsonreuters.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. fingfx.thomsonreuters.com