paint-brush
Ohio Blasts Meta for Prioritizing Financial Gain Over Young Users' Mental Health by@metaeatsbrains

Ohio Blasts Meta for Prioritizing Financial Gain Over Young Users' Mental Health

by Save the Kids From MetaDecember 24th, 2023
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story w/o Javascript
tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

Ohio alleges that Meta knowingly engaged in unconscionable acts and practices, violating the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act (CSPA) under Ohio Rev. Code §1345.03. The lawsuit contends that Meta's decisions prioritized financial gain over young users' mental health, with each act constituting a separate violation. Ohio emphasizes that Meta persisted in such practices despite previous court decisions finding them to be CSPA violations. Legal consequences may follow as Ohio takes action against Meta's alleged unconscionable conduct.
featured image - Ohio Blasts Meta for Prioritizing Financial Gain Over Young Users' Mental Health
Save the Kids From Meta HackerNoon profile picture

The United States v Meta Platforms Court Filing October 24, 2023 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This is part 88 of 100.

COUNT XLIII: VIOLATIONS OF OHIO CONSUMER SALES PRACTICES ACT – UNCONSCIONABLE CONSUMER SALES ACTS OR PRACTICES - OHIO REVISED CODE §1345.03

1101. Ohio realleges and incorporates herein by reference each of the allegations contained in the preceding paragraphs 1 through 850 as though fully alleged in this cause of action.


1102. Meta knowingly designed platforms that ignored the damaging effect said platforms have on young users’ psychological vulnerabilities. Meta made immoral, unethical, oppressive and unscrupulous decisions that prioritized Meta’s financial gain at the expense of its young users’ mental health.


1103. Meta’s conduct, acts or omissions, as described herein, constitute unconscionable acts and practices in violation of the CSPA, O.R.C. 1345.03(A).


1104. Each unconscionable act or practice engaged in by Meta as recited above constitutes a separate violation of the CSPA.


1105. The acts or practices described above have been previously determined by Ohio courts to violate the CSPA, Ohio Rev. Code §1345.01, et seq. Meta committed said violations after such decisions were made available for public inspection pursuant to Ohio Rev. Code §1345.05(A)(3).



Continue Reading Here.


About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.


This court case 4:23-cv-05448 retrieved on October 25, 2023, from Washingtonpost.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.