paint-brush
Meta's Legal Woes Deepen: New York Alleges Repeated Illegality in Business Practicesby@metaeatsbrains
115 reads

Meta's Legal Woes Deepen: New York Alleges Repeated Illegality in Business Practices

by Save the Kids From MetaDecember 23rd, 2023
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story w/o Javascript
tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

New York's Attorney General alleges that Meta engaged in repeated and persistent illegality under Executive Law § 63(12), citing violations of 15 USC § 6502(a), 16 C.F.R. §§ 312.4(b)-(d) and 312.5, N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 349, and/or N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 350. The state contends that Meta's actions constitute a violation of the law, raising the stakes in the ongoing legal battle.

People Mentioned

Mention Thumbnail

Company Mentioned

Mention Thumbnail
featured image - Meta's Legal Woes Deepen: New York Alleges Repeated Illegality in Business Practices
Save the Kids From Meta HackerNoon profile picture

The United States v Meta Platforms Court Filing October 24, 2023 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This is part 82 of 100.

COUNT XXXVII: REPEATED AND PERSISTENT ILLEGALITY IN VIOLATION OF N.Y. EXECUTIVE LAW § 63(12)

1072. The Attorney General of the State of New York realleges and incorporates by reference each and every allegation in the paragraphs above as if the same were fully set forth herein.


1073. New York Executive Law § 63(12) makes “repeated fraudulent or illegal acts or . . . persistent fraud or illegality in the carrying on, conducting or transaction of business” actionable by the Attorney General of the State of New York.


1074. At all relevant times, Meta has engaged in the carrying on, conducting or transaction of business in New York within the meaning of New York Executive Law § 63(12).


1075. Meta engaged in repeated and/or persistent illegality in violation of New York Executive Law § 63(12) through its violations of: (i) 15 USC § 6502(a); (ii) 16 C.F.R. §§ 312.4(b)-(d) and 312.5; (iii) N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 349; and/or (iv) N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 350.


1076. By engaging in the acts and practices described above, Meta has engaged in and continues to engage in repeated illegal acts or persistent illegality in violation of New York Executive Law § 63(12).



Continue Reading Here.


About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.


This court case 4:23-cv-05448 retrieved on October 25, 2023, from Washingtonpost.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.