The United States v Meta Platforms Court Filing October 24, 2023 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This is part 16 of 100.
134. Meta denies that it seeks to maximize young users’ engagement on its Social Media Platforms.
135-136. [Redacted]
137. Zuckerberg stated to Congress on March 25, 2021, that “it is a common misconception that our teams—our goals, or even have goals, of trying to increase the amount of time that people spend” and “I don’t give our News Feed team or our Instagram team goals around increasing the amount of time that people spend.”
138. Meta has also claimed, in a statement published by Gizmodo on October 3, 2021, to “do internal research to ask hard questions and find out how we can best improve the experience for teens.”
139. These representations were false and misleading. Contrary to Meta’s public statements, one of Meta’s key goals is to induce young users to spend ever-increasing amounts of time on its Social Media Platforms.
140-150. [Redacted]
150. Thus, notwithstanding Meta’s public representations to the contrary, increasing young users’ engagement was, and is, a core business objective for Meta.
Continue Reading Here.
About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.
This court case 4:23-cv-05448 retrieved on October 25, 2023, from Washingtonpost.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.