paint-brush
Meta Loves Telling Half-Truths by@metaeatsbrains
104 reads

Meta Loves Telling Half-Truths

by Save the Kids From MetaNovember 21st, 2023
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story w/o Javascript
tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

In the Colorado Consumer Protection Act saga, Meta is accused of deceptive practices by systematically withholding crucial information about its Social Media Platforms. The lawsuit alleges that Meta intentionally failed to disclose that its platforms were designed to induce compulsive and extended use, particularly harmful for young users. Furthermore, Meta is accused of understating the prevalence of harmful content. These intentional material omissions, according to the lawsuit, constitute violations of the Colorado Consumer Protection Act.

People Mentioned

Mention Thumbnail
featured image - Meta Loves Telling Half-Truths
Save the Kids From Meta HackerNoon profile picture

The United States v Meta Platforms Court Filing October 24, 2023 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This is part 52 of 100.

COUNT VII: DECEPTIVE ACTS OR PRACTICES BY META IN VIOLATION OF THE COLORADO CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, COLO. REV. STAT. § 6-1-105(1)(u)

883. Colorado realleges and incorporates by reference each of the allegations contained in the preceding paragraphs 1 through 850 as though fully alleged in this cause of action.


884. In numerous instances in connection with the advertising, marketing, promotion, and other representations regarding its Platforms, including but not limited to statements made to reporters, statements made to the public via Meta’s website, and statements provided in testimony to Congress, such as through the means described in paragraphs 846.a. through 846.g., Meta failed to disclose material information to consumers regarding its Social Media Platforms. Such information includes but is not limited to the fact that these Platforms were designed to induce compulsive and extended use, the effects of which are particularly harmful for young users, and that harmful content on the Platforms was more prevalent than what Meta represented to consumers.


885. Meta knew this information at the time it advertised, promoted, and/or sold its Platforms but failed to disclose it. Meta made these and other material omissions with an intent to induce young users to use its Social Media Platforms.


886. The material omissions alleged herein constitute separate violations of the Colorado Consumer Protection Act. By engaging in the acts and practices alleged herein, both separately and as taken together, Meta violated Colo. Rev. Stat. § 6-1-105(1)(u).



Continue Reading Here.


About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.


This court case 4:23-cv-05448 retrieved on October 25, 2023, from Washingtonpost.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.