DOE v. Github: Plaintiffs File Suit On Behalf of Themselves and Others Who Stored Software in GitHub

Written by legalpdf | Published 2023/09/06
Tech Story Tags: doe-vs-github | github-lawsuit-explained | details-of-github-lawsuit | github-lawsuit-plaintiffs | ai-assisted-coding | copilot-software-piracy | github-software-piracy | programming-lawsuit

TLDRPlaintiffs bring this action for damages and injunctive relief on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated.via the TL;DR App

DOE v. Github (original complaint) Court Filing, retrieved on November 3, 2022 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This is part 8 of 37.

VI. CLASS ALLEGATIONS

A. Class Definitions

34. Plaintiffs bring this action for damages and injunctive relief on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated as a class action pursuant to Rules 23(a), 23(b)(2), and 23(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, on behalf of the following Classes:

“Injunctive Relief Class” under Rule 23(b)(2):

All persons or entities domiciled in the United States that, (1) owned an interest in at least one US copyright in any work; (2) offered that work under one of GitHub’s Suggested Licenses[4] ; and

(3) stored Licensed Materials in any public GitHub repositories at any time between January 1, 2015 and the present (the “Class Period”).

“Damages Class” under Rule 23(b)(3):

All persons or entities domiciled in the United States that, (1) owned an interest in at least one US copyright in any work; (2) offered that work under one of GitHub’s Suggested Licenses; and (3) stored Licensed Materials in any public GitHub repositories at any time during the Class Period.

These “Class Definitions” specifically exclude the following person or entities:

a. Any of the Defendants named herein;

b. Any of the Defendants’ co-conspirators;

c. Any of Defendants’ parent companies, subsidiaries, and affiliates;

d. Any of Defendants’ officers, directors, management, employees, subsidiaries, affiliates, or agents;

e. All governmental entities; and

f. The judges and chambers staff in this case, as well as any members of their immediate families.

Continue Reading Here.


About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.

This court case 3:22-cv-06823-KAW retrieved on September 5, 2023, from Storage.Courtlistener is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.


Written by legalpdf | Legal PDFs of important tech court cases are far too inaccessible for the average reader... until now.
Published by HackerNoon on 2023/09/06