DOE v. Github (original complaint) Court Filing, retrieved on November 3, 2022 is part of . You can jump to any part in this filing here. This is the table of links with all parts. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series Case Number: 3:22-cv-06823-KAW Plaintiff: DOE Defendant: Github Presiding Judge: Jon S Tigar Referring Judge: Kandis A Westmore Filing Date: November 3, 2022 Location: US District Court for the Northern District of California TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION I. OVERVIEW: A BRAVE NEW WORLD OF SOFTWARE PIRACY II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE III. INTRADISTRICT ASSIGNMENT IV. PARTIES Plaintiffs Defendants V. AGENTS AND CO-CONSPIRATORS VI. CLASS ALLEGATIONS A. Class Definitions B. Numerosity C. Typicality D. Commonality & Predominance E. Adequacy F. Other Class Considerations VII. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS A. Introduction B. Codex Outputs Copyrighted Materials Without Following the Terms of the Applicable Licenses C. Copilot Outputs Copyrighted Materials Without Following the Terms of the Applicable Licenses D. Codex and Copilot Were Trained on Copyrighted Materials Offered Under Licenses E. Copilot Was Launched Despite Its Propensity for Producing Unlawful Outputs F. Open-Source Licenses Began to Appear in the Early 1990s G. Microsoft Has a History of Flouting Open-Source License Requirements H. GitHub Was Designed to Cater to Open-Source Projects I. OpenAI Is Intertwined with Microsoft and GitHub J. Conclusion of Factual Allegations VIII. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF COUNT I COUNT II COUNT III COUNT IV COUNT V COUNT VI COUNT VII COUNT VIII COUNT IX COUNT X COUNT XI COUNT XII IX. DEMAND FOR JUDGMENT X. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case 3:22-cv-06823-KAW retrieved on September 5, 2023, from is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. Storage.Courtlistener

DOE v. Github: Original Complaint Pertaining to Copyright Infringement, Open Source Licenses & More

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Untitled Story

20% of All General Searches in the U.S. Go Through the Default on User-Downloaded Version of Chrome

Details of the OpenAI Lawsuit: The Plaintiffs' Fail to Plead a Violation of the CCPA

OpenAI: A Hunch Does Not Justify Jurisdictional Discovery

OpenAI Argues That the Plaintiffs' 1202 Claim Should Be Dismissed

OpenAI Believes Its Lawsuit Should Be Thrown Out for Failure to State a Claim Under Rule

20% of All General Searches in the U.S. Go Through the Default on User-Downloaded Version of Chrome

Details of the OpenAI Lawsuit: The Plaintiffs' Fail to Plead a Violation of the CCPA

OpenAI: A Hunch Does Not Justify Jurisdictional Discovery

OpenAI Argues That the Plaintiffs' 1202 Claim Should Be Dismissed

OpenAI Believes Its Lawsuit Should Be Thrown Out for Failure to State a Claim Under Rule

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps