John McAfee: The FBI Is Either Incompetent or Corrupt in dealing with Hillary’s
1,602 reads
1,602 reads

John McAfee: The FBI Is Either Incompetent or Corrupt in dealing with Hillary’s Emails.

by Rob LoggiaNovember 3rd, 2016
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story w/o Javascript
tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

By John McAfee
featured image - John McAfee: The FBI Is Either Incompetent or Corrupt in dealing with Hillary’s Emails.
Rob Loggia HackerNoon profile picture

By John McAfee

I finally got around to watching the interrogation of FBI Director James Comey, which occurred on October 19th, by Congressman Jim Jordan. (). It was an eye opening epiphany, and it once and for all made clear to me that the cyber technologists within the FBI are either the most incompetent on this planet, or that the FBI is as corrupt as the Cabinet Ministers in Belize, who hold the world’s record for corruption — and with whom, by the way, I have more than a little experience.

I was watching the interrogation with lukewarm interest up to the point that the congressman asked Comey if the FBI was aware of Paul Combetta’s inquiry on Reddit about how to strip an email address from a server”s email data base. Mr. Combetta, by the way, is the technical expert who ultimately deleted 33,000 of Hillary Clinton’s emails.

Two points stood out:

  1. Comey was not sure that the FBI was aware of Combetta’s post on Reddit. He knew Hillary’s email address had been removed but he believed that the emails were still intact.
  2. Combetta testified that Hillary was afraid that her email address would be given to the public. So he removed it from the emails.

Now, any competent software engineer can take the above two conditions and will come to the same conclusion that I reached: Clinton, or someone in her staff, came up with the bright idea of legally (sort of) stripping all of the headers from Hillary’s emails, rendering the remaining texts virtually useless. They would have no ‘from’ or ‘to” fields, no date stamps, no time stamps, and no information on who may or may not have been copied on the emails — and, it could be done, seemingly in a legal fashion, by stating “We only removed Hillary’s Email address for privacy reason’s”. The fact that the entire header, necessarily, also disappeared was an “unexpected” artifact of the process. “Oops.. my bad” was all someone had to say. Brilliant, I admit. but due to extenuating circumstances, it didn’t work out the way it was planned, for reasons I will explain later. So the radical step of using Bleachbit to wipe the emails was eventually taken. But first, how did I arrive at my above conclusion.

Let’s first examine Combetta’s testimony that Clinton was afraid the her email address would be leaked to the public.

To my knowledge, and as common knowledge to most people — neither the FBI, nor any other investigative body of the Federal Government, has ever made public the email address of any target of an investigation, whether charges were filed or not. Hillary Clinton is smart enough to be running for President so this gem of information has to be well known to her. As to the few members of Congress who might get access through an investigation, all of them already have her email address and she has emailed most of them multiple times.

Clearly, Combetta’s testimony is either blatantly false, or Hillary is completely in the dark about obvious policies and procedures within the Justice Department, and she should immediately recuse herself from the Presidential race as being unqualified. I cannot believe that Hillary is ignorant of the fact that her email address would absolutely not be released to the public. I doubt that anyone would believe this. We are forced to believe then, that Combetta’s testimony is blatantly untrue.

Let’s now examine the technical side of this affair. First, Combetta is no slouch when it comes Information Science. You would expect a person of the highest caliber and competence to be in charge of a server containing Above Top Secret national documents, and Combetta does not disappoint. So I have no problem with his talents. And that is the problem I’m having with the story.

Combetta posted the following on Reddit, one day after the House Select Committee on Benghazi had reached an agreement with the State Department on the production of all of her emails:

The strange thing about this is that any first year computer science student could answer this question correctly even while drunk at a frat party. And the answer is simple: “No f — Ing way”. At least not without tens of thousands of hours of manual labor (33,000 emails) or a piece of software that you would have to write yourself — which would require more time to code and test than the subpoena for the emails allowed.

Here are a couple of the expected responses from Reddit:

Email systems are designed to make it difficult to modify the sender, receiver, date and time for obvious legal reasons. However, stripping the entire header is trivial. People frequently want just the texts of emails for a variety of reasons.

It is not believable that Combetta — a person charged with the technical responsibility for the Secretary of States’ personal server — would not be fully conversant with Information Science 101 regarding how email servers function. It is simply inconceivable.

Why then did he post that query on Reddit? Too many drugs? Unlikely. Even if I were high on a mix of acid, meth, and K and had swallowed a half bottle of scotch to take the edge off the Meth, I believe I could still remember that simple fact.

The inescapable conclusion, to me at least, is that the post was carefully crafted to provide a record indicating that Combetta was merely attempting to save Hillary the potential embarrassment of having her email address released to the public.

If Combetta did indeed try to modify the header to change an email address, then the result would most assuredly have been the total destruction of the header. Email providers create safeguards against such modifications. A world class Hacker could do it, with a lot of work, and time, which Combetta did not have.

Again, Combetta knows all of this well. If not, then Clinton hired an idiot, which does not recommend her well.

As to why this process did not achieve its goal? Blame Wikileaks. Even with no headers, the redacted emails would still be in sequence in the email database. It would not take much to write a forensics program to cross reference known email senders, receivers, dates and times, with the redacted emails. I suspect that 95% or more of the missing data could be recovered.

Has the FBI thought of this? Isn’t that the question?