15,653 reads
How to Insert Binary Tree in Rust
by Daw-Chih LiouJanuary 14th, 2022
Too Long; Didn't Read
🌳 We'll implement a Binary Tree together. 🧑🌾 We'll discuss a couple of ways to insert a node in a Binary Tree. 🧑🔬 We'll discuss Rust's ownership in action. ✨ We'll touch on more features and syntax in Rust.Companies Mentioned
TL;DR
- 🌳 We'll implement a Binary Tree together.
- 🧑🌾 We'll discuss a couple of ways to insert a node in a Binary Tree.
- 🧑🔬 We'll discuss Rust's ownership in action.
- ✨ We'll touch on more features and syntax in Rust.
I was struggling hard with Rust's ownership when implementing a Binary Tree, so I pivoted and re-read about it. After taking my time understanding it and refactoring my code, I finally made a breakthrough😎 I'm very excited to share with you the awesome features in Rust I came across. You'll see interesting concepts like smart pointers and ownership.
Let's get it!
Data Structure
A
Each node has no more than two child nodes. We refer to them as left child and right child. We can translate the description into Rust code like this:
pub struct BinaryTree<T> {
pub value: T,
pub left: Option<Box<BinaryTree<T>>>,
pub right: Option<Box<BinaryTree<T>>>,
}
The BinaryTree struct holds a value with the generic type T. We use Option enum to represent that the left and right child are both optional.
A Option<T> is either a Some that contains a value of the type T, or a None that represents it doesn't. Because we are using Option to express whether a value is either something or nothing, the Rust compiler can check if we handle all the cases null value to express the same concept, Option encourages me to handle use cases upfront, and it saves me a lot of trouble in runtime.
The Box is one of the smart pointers. It saves an address that points to data in memory. Boxhelps us to create a BinaryTree struct with an unknown size so that we can grow the Binary Tree by inserting nodes without thinking ahead how many nodes we'll have when creating the tree.
Insertion
Before inserting a new Binary Tree node, we need to create a root. Let's implement it:
impl<T> BinaryTree<T> {
pub fn new(value: T) -> Self {
BinaryTree {
value,
left: None,
right: None,
}
}
}
The new T and return a BinaryTree that holds the value and no child nodes.
Now that we can use BinaryTree::new to create a root node, we can think about how to insert child nodes. Intuitively, it would be great if we could insert the left or right child node by calling methods on the root node instance. Like this:
BinaryTree::new(1)
.left(BinaryTree::new(2))
.right(BinaryTree::new(3))
Luckily, I found a
impl<T> BinaryTree<T> {
pub fn new(value: T) -> Self {
BinaryTree {
value,
left: None,
right: None,
}
}
pub fn left(mut self, node: BinaryTree<T>) -> Self {
self.left = Some(Box::new(node));
self
}
pub fn right(mut self, node: BinaryTree<T>) -> Self {
self.right = Some(Box::new(node));
self
}
}
Now let's write some tests to make sure the associated functions work:
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use super::*;
#[test]
fn create_new_tree() {
let tree = BinaryTree::new(1);
assert_eq!(tree.value, 1);
}
#[test]
fn insert_left() {
let tree = BinaryTree::new(1).left(BinaryTree::new(2));
if let Some(node) = tree.left {
assert_eq!(node.value, 2);
}
assert_eq!(tree.right, None);
}
#[test]
fn insert_right() {
let tree = BinaryTree::new(1).right(BinaryTree::new(2));
if let Some(node) = tree.right {
assert_eq!(node.value, 2);
}
assert_eq!(tree.left, None);
}
}
🥳
Breadth-First Insertion
The insertion methods are very flexible, and we can easily create a tree in just a few lines:
BinaryTree::new(1)
.left(
BinaryTree::new(2)
.left(BinaryTree::new(4))
.right(BinaryTree::new(5))
)
.right(BinaryTree::new(3))
The code creates a Binary Tree like this:
It got me thinking.
If I just want to create a
balanced Binary Tree without any other requirements, can I insert a node and the tree finds the next available spot for me?
Something like this:
let mut root = BinaryTree::new(1);
root.insert(2);
root.insert(3);
root.insert(4);
root.insert(5);
And it creates the same tree structure as we saw above.
We can achieve it by traversing the tree in the
The easiest way to implement a breath-first traversal is with a VecDequeue in the standard library we can use.
pub fn insert(&mut self, new_value: T) {
let mut queue: VecDeque<&mut BinaryTree<T>> = VecDeque::new();
queue.push_front(self);
loop {
let BinaryTree {
ref mut left,
ref mut right,
..
} = queue.pop_back().unwrap();
match left {
Some(node) => {
queue.push_front(node);
}
None => {
*left = Some(Box::new(BinaryTree::new(new_value)));
return;
}
}
match right {
Some(node) => {
queue.push_front(node);
}
None => {
*right = Some(Box::new(BinaryTree::new(new_value)));
return;
}
}
}
}
The algorithm is to force the loop to visit sibling nodes first, from left to right, before visiting the next layer of child nodes. In each iteration, we'll check if either the left or right child is absent. If we find one, that's the next available spot for the new node.
It's a rather straightforward algorithm, but
Let's go through the insert method together.
First thing we want to decide is how do we want to use the first argument self. self is referring to the BinaryTree instance the method is called on. What we need from self is to be able to mutate the left and right child node so that we can insert a new node. Simply passing in a mutable reference &mut self will do the job because the method doesn't need to take ownership of self.
For the VecDeque item data type, we can use the same data type as self to store mutable references of BinaryTree.
When popping the queue inside the loop, we want to use a mutable reference to left and rightbecause we want to insert the new node.
When inserting the new node, we left and right to allow the new node assignment, like this: *left = Some(Box::new(BinaryTree::new(new_value))).
It took me some time to figure out how to borrow or move the data in the method. Once I got it, it made so much sense!
Let's write some tests for it🧑🔬
#[test]
fn insert() {
let mut tree = BinaryTree::new(1);
tree.insert(2);
tree.insert(3);
tree.insert(4);
tree.insert(5);
assert_eq!(
tree,
BinaryTree::new(1)
.left(
BinaryTree::new(2)
.left(BinaryTree::new(4))
.right(BinaryTree::new(5))
)
.right(BinaryTree::new(3))
);
tree.insert(6);
assert_eq!(
tree,
BinaryTree::new(1)
.left(
BinaryTree::new(2)
.left(BinaryTree::new(4))
.right(BinaryTree::new(5))
)
.right(BinaryTree::new(3).left(BinaryTree::new(6)))
)
}
If we run the tests, you'll see an error message like this:
It's because the trees couldn't compare with each other. We can fix it by adding PartialEq trait to the BinaryTree struct.
+ #[derive(PartialEq)]
pub struct BinaryTree<T> {
pub value: T,
pub left: Option<Box<BinaryTree<T>>>,
pub right: Option<Box<BinaryTree<T>>>,
}
🥳
Converting Array into Binary Tree
Now that we have an automatic insertion with the insert method, we can consider creating a balanced tree more conveniently. For example, I want to have something similar to Vec::from: an associated function BinaryTree::from that takes in an array and returns a balanced BinaryTree.
Let's write a test to visualize the use case better:
#[test]
fn create_new_tree_with_from() {
// `BinaryTree::from` takes in a reference of an array because borrowing is sufficient
let tree = BinaryTree::from(&[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]);
assert_eq!(
tree,
BinaryTree::new(1)
.left(
BinaryTree::new(2)
.left(BinaryTree::new(4))
.right(BinaryTree::new(5))
)
.right(BinaryTree::new(3).left(BinaryTree::new(6)))
)
}
To implement BinaryTree::from, we can iterate through the array and use the insert method to create the tree structure.
impl<T> BinaryTree<T> {
pub fn from(new_values: &[T]) -> Self {
let (first, rest) = new_values.split_first().unwrap();
let mut root: BinaryTree<T> = BinaryTree::new(*first);
for value in rest {
root.insert(*value)
}
root
}
}
In the function, we created a root node from the first array element and then inserted the rest element in the tree one by one.
If you try to test it, you'll see an error message like this:
We can fix it by specifying the type T implements the Copy trait.
- impl<T> BinaryTree<T> {
+ impl<T> BinaryTree<T>
+ where
+ T: Copy,
+ {
The reason is that the insert method actually take ownership over new_value. In order to keep the program memory saved, the compiler didn't allow us to "move" the array elements into the insert method because the array might be referenced in other parts of the program. So what we can do is to pass in a copy (duplicate) of an array element.
Now it should work!
Final Thoughts
That's it! The full implementation of our Binary Tree assertion is here⬇️
#[derive(Debug, PartialEq)]
pub struct BinaryTree<T> {
pub value: T,
pub left: Option<Box<BinaryTree<T>>>,
pub right: Option<Box<BinaryTree<T>>>,
}
impl<T> BinaryTree<T>
where
T: Copy,
{
///
/// Create a new Binary Tree node.
///
pub fn new(value: T) -> Self {
BinaryTree {
value,
left: None,
right: None,
}
}
///
/// Create a balanced tree from an array reference.
///
pub fn from(new_values: &[T]) -> Self {
let (first, rest) = new_values.split_first().unwrap();
let mut root: BinaryTree<T> = BinaryTree::new(*first);
for value in rest {
root.insert(*value)
}
root
}
///
/// Insert a tree node in the next available branch with breadth first traversal.
///
pub fn insert(&mut self, new_value: T) {
let mut queue: VecDeque<&mut BinaryTree<T>> = VecDeque::new();
queue.push_front(self);
loop {
let BinaryTree {
ref mut left,
ref mut right,
..
} = queue.pop_back().unwrap();
match left {
Some(node) => {
queue.push_front(node);
}
None => {
*left = Some(Box::new(BinaryTree::new(new_value)));
return;
}
}
match right {
Some(node) => {
queue.push_front(node);
}
None => {
*right = Some(Box::new(BinaryTree::new(new_value)));
return;
}
}
}
}
///
/// Insert a left child node.
///
pub fn left(mut self, node: BinaryTree<T>) -> Self {
self.left = Some(Box::new(node));
self
}
///
/// Insert a right child node.
///
pub fn right(mut self, node: BinaryTree<T>) -> Self {
self.right = Some(Box::new(node));
self
}
}
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use super::*;
#[test]
fn create_new_tree() {
let tree = BinaryTree::new(1);
assert_eq!(tree.value, 1);
}
#[test]
fn insert_left() {
let tree = BinaryTree::new(1).left(BinaryTree::new(2));
if let Some(node) = tree.left {
assert_eq!(node.value, 2);
}
assert_eq!(tree.right, None);
}
#[test]
fn insert_right() {
let tree = BinaryTree::new(1).right(BinaryTree::new(2));
if let Some(node) = tree.right {
assert_eq!(node.value, 2);
}
assert_eq!(tree.left, None);
}
#[test]
fn insert() {
let mut tree = BinaryTree::new(1);
tree.insert(2);
tree.insert(3);
tree.insert(4);
tree.insert(5);
assert_eq!(
tree,
BinaryTree::new(1)
.left(
BinaryTree::new(2)
.left(BinaryTree::new(4))
.right(BinaryTree::new(5))
)
.right(BinaryTree::new(3))
);
tree.insert(6);
assert_eq!(
tree,
BinaryTree::new(1)
.left(
BinaryTree::new(2)
.left(BinaryTree::new(4))
.right(BinaryTree::new(5))
)
.right(BinaryTree::new(3).left(BinaryTree::new(6)))
)
}
#[test]
fn create_new_tree_from() {
let tree = BinaryTree::from(&[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]);
assert_eq!(
tree,
BinaryTree::new(1)
.left(
BinaryTree::new(2)
.left(BinaryTree::new(4))
.right(BinaryTree::new(5))
)
.right(BinaryTree::new(3).left(BinaryTree::new(6)))
)
}
}
Reference
Binary Tree Balanced Binary Tree Breadth-First Search Queue Rust OptionTypeRust BoxPointerRust VecDequeueRust PartialEqTraitRust CopyTraitRust Vec::fromRust Associated Function Rust Ownership JavaSCript nullThe Stack and the Heap Of Boxes and Trees - Smart Pointers in Rust Problem with Implementing Binary Tree Insertion The Option Enum and Its Advantages Over Null Values Treating Smart Pointers Like Regular References with the Deref Trait
This article is originally posted on Daw-Chih’s website.
L O A D I N G
. . . comments & more!
. . . comments & more!
