paint-brush
GitHub and Microsoft Use Plaintiff's Anonymity Against Them in Copyright Lawsuitby@legalpdf

GitHub and Microsoft Use Plaintiff's Anonymity Against Them in Copyright Lawsuit

by Legal PDFSeptember 22nd, 2023
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story w/o Javascript
tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

The Complaint should be dismissed in its entirety pursuant to Rules 10 and 12(b)(1) because Plaintiffs fail to identify themselves.
featured image - GitHub and Microsoft Use Plaintiff's Anonymity Against Them in Copyright Lawsuit
Legal PDF HackerNoon profile picture

Github Motion to dismiss Court Filing, retrieved on January 26, 2023 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This part is 1 of 26.

NOTICE OF MOTIONS AND MOTIONS

TO PLAINTIFFS AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:


PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT on May 4, 2023 at 2:00 p.m., before the Honorable Jon S. Tigar seated in Courtroom 6 of the United States Courthouse at Oakland, California, with appearances to be made by Zoom videoconference unless otherwise ordered by the Court, Defendants GitHub, Inc. (“GitHub”) and Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”) will, and hereby do, move, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 9, 10, 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6), to dismiss the operative Complaint in these consolidated actions, filed as ECF No. 1 in the 22-cv-07074 action (the “Complaint” or “Compl.”), in its entirety as to both GitHub and Microsoft. See ECF No. 47 (ordering consolidation and designation of the operative Complaint).


The grounds for the Motions are as follows. First, the Complaint should be dismissed in its entirety pursuant to Rules 10 and 12(b)(1) because Plaintiffs fail to identify themselves and fail to allege that they suffered any actual or threatened injury at the hands of either GitHub or Microsoft sufficient to give rise to a concrete controversy to be adjudicated by this Court. Second, the Complaint should be dismissed in its entirety pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) (and Rule 9 with respect to Count IV for Fraud) because each and every one of the numerous claims for relief interposed against GitHub and Microsoft are either (a) legally foreclosed, (b) deficient because factual allegations required to support necessary elements are missing or implausible, or (c) both.



Continue Reading Here.


About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.


This court case 4:22-cv-06823-JST retrieved on September 11, 2023, from documentcloud.org is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.