Artificial intelligence researchers are constantly seeking new ways to improve the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3/4 and PaLM. One promising new technique called Contrastive Decoding has shown remarkable potential for boosting performance on reasoning tasks without requiring any additional training. In this post, we'll dig into how works, the key technical findings from initial experiments, and why this approach could be a game-changer for strengthening neural network reasoning. We'll summarize and speculate on the paper published on Arxiv, which you can read . Contrastive Decoding here The Limitations of Today's LLMs LLMs like GPT-3, PaLM, and LaMDA have demonstrated incredibly human-like abilities for natural language generation. Feed them a few sentences of prompt, and they can produce paragraphs or even pages of astonishingly coherent text. However, despite their eloquence, these models still stumble when it comes to logical reasoning. For example, you could give one of these models a word problem about calculating percentages or unit conversion, and it might make silly arithmetic mistakes or fail to show its work. Solving math word problems reliably remains an elusive challenge for LLMs. The broader field of has coined the term "System 1" thinking to characterize the intuitive abilities of like LLMs. Their pattern recognition prowess enables fluent generation of text, translation between languages, and even the creation of music or code. However, "System 2" thinking - which encompasses deliberate, logical reasoning - remains a key weakness. Improving systematic reasoning is critical for LLMs to robustly solve challenges like mathematical word problems, debugging code, making trustworthy predictions about the future, or advising about high-stakes decisions. AI neural networks How Contrastive Decoding Boosts Reasoning Contrastive Decoding is a clever technique proposed by researchers at Anthropic and UC San Diego for accentuating the reasoning capabilities of LLMs. Here's how it works at a high level: You utilize two models - a stronger "expert" LLM and a weaker "amateur" LLM. When generating text, Contrastive Decoding favors outputs where the expert model assigns a much higher likelihood than the amateur. This accentuates whatever skills the expert model has learned beyond the amateur model. For example, consider a math word problem. The amateur model might assign a high likelihood to simple but incorrect solutions, taking shortcuts instead of showing step-by-step work. However, the expert model will assign those solutions a lower likelihood, penalizing the shortcuts. By contrasting the expert and amateur, Contrastive Decoding reduces the chances of selecting those shortcut solutions. You can think of the amateur model as a teacher who makes common mistakes, while the expert model acts as the sterling tutor identifying those errors. Contrastive Decoding uses their disagreement to robustly identify stronger reasoning chains. Key Technical Findings The researchers validated Contrastive Decoding on a diverse set of reasoning tasks spanning mathematical word problems, common sense reasoning, and logical inference challenges. Some of the key findings: On mathematical word problem benchmarks, Contrastive Decoding improved accuracy by anywhere from 3 to 8 percentage points. For instance, it enabled a 7 billion parameter LLM to outperform a 12 billion parameter LLM without contrastive decoding on algebra word problems. Contrastive Decoding achieved state-of-the-art results on the difficult HellaSwag benchmark, surpassing models like and PaLM 2-Large, which boast over 10X more parameters. GPT-3.5 Detailed analysis suggested that Contrastive Decoding reduces "shortcuts" like verbatim copying from the input text. This forces models to show more systematic logical work in their step-by-step reasoning. Taking a "majority vote" across multiple solutions generated for the same problem becomes more accurate under Contrastive Decoding. This demonstrates improved consistency. The choice of an amateur model proved important. A low-parameter or partially-trained model performed best as the amateur. Using a negative prompt did not work as well as a full but lower-skilled model. The researchers also found Contrastive Decoding to increase computational efficiency. The small amateur model adds minimal overhead while providing sizable accuracy gains over alternatives like generating multiple solutions and taking a majority vote. Why This Matters for the Future of AI Contrastive Decoding offers an enticing path forward for strengthening neural network reasoning without requiring any extra training. The fact that it improved performance across diverse reasoning domains highlights its potential as a general technique. Early results are promising, but plenty of open research remains to build upon this foundation. This approach could enable models to learn from fewer examples, make better use of available training data, and more clearly exhibit expert-level mastery within their capabilities. Such efficiency and skill could hasten progress on challenges like achieving robust, human-level reasoning. And Contrastive Decoding provides a framework for accentuating using only unlabeled data - a tantalizing possibility. model strengths Of course, many caveats apply. Contrastive Decoding does not instantly solve all reasoning challenges, and it may not readily apply to domains with sparse feedback like planning for complex real-world scenarios. But its generality makes it well suited for continued investigation. This technique demonstrates that with the right generation guidance, today's LLMs may intrinsically harbor more systematic reasoning potential than their typical output reveals. Contrastive Decoding and related ideas could light the path ahead for the next generation of radically capable AI systems. Also published . here

This story contains new, firsthand information uncovered by the writer.

Who Could Have Guessed LLMs are Great at Compressing Images and Audio: Reports From New Research

Meet CulturaX: Training AI Models in 167 Languages for Multi-Language Tech

Tell me why my site sucks so I can make it better. Be mean.

Read My Stories

Too Long; Didn't Read

Make resilience your competitive advantage

Enhancing Neural Network Reasoning: The Promise of Contrastive Decoding for LLMs

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Untitled Story

Say Goodbye to Tokens, and Say Hello to Patches

The Noonification: Use This 7-Step McKinsey Framework to Solve Any Problem (1/10/2023)

The Noonification: A Taxonomy of Inclusiveness (1/11/2024)

The Noonification: What is the InfiniteNature-Zero AI Model? (11/19/2022)

10 Ways AI Has Changed Our Lives

Say Goodbye to Tokens, and Say Hello to Patches

The Noonification: Use This 7-Step McKinsey Framework to Solve Any Problem (1/10/2023)

The Noonification: A Taxonomy of Inclusiveness (1/11/2024)

The Noonification: What is the InfiniteNature-Zero AI Model? (11/19/2022)

10 Ways AI Has Changed Our Lives

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps