131 reads
DOE vs. GitHub: The Details
by Legal PDF: Tech Court CasesSeptember 5th, 2023
Too Long; Didn't Read
DOE vs. Github (amended complaint) Court Filing (Redacted), June 8, 2023, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This is part 38 of 38.
DOE vs. Github (amended complaint) Court Filing (Redacted), June 8, 2023, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This is part 38 of 38.
X. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 38(b), Plaintiffs demand a trial by jury of all the claims asserted in this Complaint so triable.
Joseph R. Saveri (State Bar No. 130064)
Steven N. Williams (State Bar No. 175489)
Cadio Zirpoli (State Bar No. 179108)
Christopher K.L. Young (State Bar No. 318371)
Louis A. Kessler (State Bar No. 243703)
Elissa A. Buchanan (State Bar No. 249996)
Travis Manfredi (State Bar No. 281779)
JOSEPH SAVERI LAW FIRM, LLP
601 California Street, Suite 1000
San Francisco, California 94108
Telephone: (415) 500-6800
Facsimile: (415) 395-9940
Email: [email protected]
Matthew Butterick (State Bar No. 250953)
1920 Hillhurst Avenue, #406
Los Angeles, CA 90027
Telephone: (323) 968-2632
Facsimile: (415) 395-9940
Email: [email protected]
Counsel for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class
About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.
This court case 4:22-cv-06823-JST retrieved on August 26, 2023, from Storage Courtlistener is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.
L O A D I N G
. . . comments & more!
. . . comments & more!
