One of TikTok&#x27;s youngest and most adorable stars, toddler Evelyn Mae, visited &quot;The Kelly Clarkson Show&quot; and showed off her &quot;wet set&quot; hairstyle that has the...

Kelly Clarkson meets adorable 'Golden Girl' toddler who is taking TikTok by storm

The leaders of a bipartisan panel that is focused on China have sent a letter asking the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to investigate whether TikTok has violated child protection laws in its efforts to stop the United States from banning the app. The letter, obtained by The Hill and first ...

House panel requests FTC investigate if TikTok violated child protection act | The Hill

Federal prosecutors said the woman from Shirley, N.Y., was not licensed to administer medication and was selling drugs brought from abroad that were not authorized by the Food and Drug Administration.

Woman Who Sold Misbranded Ozempic on TikTok Faces Smuggling Charge - The New York Times

Baloy reportedly &#x27;passed away peacefully&#x27; on Wednesday.

Maddy Baloy, TikTok Star, Dead at 26 After Cancer Battle | Entertainment Tonight

The latest breaking news on celebrities, royals, entertainment and current events that matter.

TikTok Star Maddy Baloy Dead at 26 After Terminal Cancer Battle

The two companies reached a new licensing deal, ending a three-month stalemate that kept some of pop’s biggest stars off the platform.

Universal Music Artists Will Return to TikTok - The New York Times

Universal Music Group and TikTok have signed a new licensing agreement, the companies announced on Thursday.

Taylor Swift, Drake label Universal Music Group returns to TikTok with new deal

Gypsy Rose Blanchard is embracing her new look, and showed off her nose job in two recent TikTok posts. The former inmate, 32, took to TikTok on Wednesday, May 1, to share photos of herself getting her makeup done while promoting her upcoming docuseries, Gypsy Rose: Life After Lock Up.

Gypsy Rose Blanchard Shows Off Nose Job in New TikTok Posts After Plastic Surgery

TikTok and Universal Music Group have settled a royalty dispute to bring the latter&#x27;s music back onto the platform.

TikTok and Universal Music Group Settle Royalty Dispute With New Licensing Agreement

Leah Smith&#x27;s mother says her memory will live on in a charity to help families dealing with cancer.

TikTok star's mum to keep daughter's name alive after cancer death

TikTok (ByteDance)

tiktok

Are you looking to create engaging faceless short videos for platforms like YouTube or TikTok but want to avoid the hassle of complex video editing? This article will walk you through how to automate the entire process using OpenAI, ElevenLabs, and MoviePy. By the end of this tutorial, you'll know how to automatically generate visuals and voiceovers for short videos based on any script. Whether you’re creating educational content, storytelling, or meme videos, this workflow will save you tons of time. Prerequisites Before getting started, you’ll need: API keys for both OpenAI (for generating visuals) and ElevenLabs (for voiceovers).
Basic Python knowledge.
MoviePy and other required Python libraries installed (moviepy, openai, elevenlabs, etc.). Step 1: Setting Up API Keys import openai
from elevenlabs import ElevenLabs

# Set up your OpenAI and ElevenLabs API keys
openai.api_key = "your_openai_api_key"
elevenlabs_client = ElevenLabs(api_key="your_elevenlabs_api_key") Start by getting API keys from OpenAI and ElevenLabs. Replace the placeholders in the code with your actual API keys. Step 2: Preparing the Script Your video starts with a story or script. You can replace the story_script variable with the text you want to turn into a video. Here’s an example script about Dogecoin: story_script = """
Dogecoin began as a joke in 2013, inspired by the popular 'Doge' meme featuring a Shiba Inu dog. It unexpectedly gained a massive following thanks to its community's charitable initiatives, eventually evolving into a legitimate cryptocurrency with support from Elon Musk.
""" The script will be split into sentences to match each visual and audio segment. Step 3: Generating Images with OpenAI’s DALL-E For each sentence, we generate a corresponding image using OpenAI’s DALL-E model. def generate_image_from_text(sentence, context, idx):
    prompt = f"Generate an image without any text that describes: {sentence}. Context: {context}"
    response = openai.images.generate(
        model="dall-e-3",
        prompt=prompt,
        size="1024x1792",
        response_format="b64_json"
    )

    image_filename = f"images/image_{idx}.jpg"
    with open(image_filename, "wb") as f:
        f.write(base64.b64decode(response.data[0].b64_json))
    return image_filename This function sends each sentence to DALL-E and saves the generated image. We ensure the generated visuals match the video's theme. Step 4: Generating Voiceovers with ElevenLabs Once we have the visuals, we need voiceovers. ElevenLabs converts each sentence into speech. def generate_audio_from_text(sentence, idx):
    audio = elevenlabs_client.text_to_speech.convert(
        voice_id="pqHfZKP75CvOlQylNhV4",
        model_id="eleven_multilingual_v2",
        text=sentence,
        voice_settings=VoiceSettings(stability=0.2, similarity_boost=0.8)
    )
    audio_filename = f"audio/audio_{idx}.mp3"
    with open(audio_filename, "wb") as f:
        for chunk in audio:
            f.write(chunk)
    return audio_filename This function generates an audio file for each sentence. You can select different voice settings to customize the narration style. Step 5: Combining Audio and Video Next, we pair each image with its corresponding voiceover using MoviePy: from moviepy.editor import ImageClip, AudioFileClip

image_clip = ImageClip(image_path, duration=audio_clip.duration)
image_clip = image_clip.set_audio(audio_clip)
video_clips.append(image_clip.set_fps(30)) Each image is displayed for the duration of its audio clip, ensuring synchronization. Step 6: Applying Video Effects To make the video more dynamic, we apply zoom and fade effects to each image. For example, the apply_zoom_in_center effect slowly zooms into the center of the image: def apply_zoom_in_center(image_clip, duration):
    return image_clip.resize(lambda t: 1 + 0.04 * t) Other effects include zooming in from the upper part or zooming out. These effects are applied randomly to each clip to keep the video visually engaging. Step 7: Final Video Assembly We combine all video clips into one seamless video and add background music: final_video = concatenate_videoclips(video_clips, method="compose")
final_video.write_videofile(output_video_path, codec="libx264", audio_codec="aac", fps=30) Step 8: Adding Captions Captions improve video accessibility and engagement. We use Captacity to automatically add captions based on the audio. captacity.add_captions(
    video_file=output_video_path,
    output_file="captioned_video.mp4",
    font_size=130,
    font_color="yellow",
    stroke_width=3
) Step 9: Adding Background Music To finish the video, background music is added. The volume is reduced so that it doesn't overpower the narration. background_music = AudioFileClip(music_filename).subclip(0, final_video.duration).volumex(0.2)
narration_audio = final_video.audio.volumex(1.5)
combined_audio = CompositeAudioClip([narration_audio, background_music])
final_video.set_audio(combined_audio) Conclusion The GitHub repository for this project is available here. By using OpenAI and ElevenLabs, we’ve automated the creation of faceless videos from text. You can now quickly generate YouTube Shorts or TikToks without needing a camera or microphone. This automated process has allowed us to create a Faceless Shorts Video service on our Robopost software, offering content creators a seamless way to produce high-quality videos. Whether you are creating educational videos, short stories, or even meme-style content, this service handles everything from visuals to voiceovers with minimal effort. Now, you can focus on creativity and storytelling while Robopost handles the heavy lifting of video production. Happy creating! Are you looking to create engaging faceless short videos for platforms like YouTube or TikTok but want to avoid the hassle of complex video editing? This article will walk you through how to automate the entire process using OpenAI , ElevenLabs , and MoviePy . OpenAI ElevenLabs MoviePy By the end of this tutorial, you'll know how to automatically generate visuals and voiceovers for short videos based on any script. Whether you’re creating educational content, storytelling, or meme videos, this workflow will save you tons of time. Prerequisites Before getting started, you’ll need: API keys for both OpenAI (for generating visuals) and ElevenLabs (for voiceovers). Basic Python knowledge. MoviePy and other required Python libraries installed (moviepy, openai, elevenlabs, etc.). API keys for both OpenAI (for generating visuals) and ElevenLabs (for voiceovers). API keys Basic Python knowledge. MoviePy and other required Python libraries installed ( moviepy , openai , elevenlabs , etc.). moviepy openai elevenlabs Step 1: Setting Up API Keys import openai
from elevenlabs import ElevenLabs

# Set up your OpenAI and ElevenLabs API keys
openai.api_key = "your_openai_api_key"
elevenlabs_client = ElevenLabs(api_key="your_elevenlabs_api_key") import openai
from elevenlabs import ElevenLabs

# Set up your OpenAI and ElevenLabs API keys
openai.api_key = "your_openai_api_key"
elevenlabs_client = ElevenLabs(api_key="your_elevenlabs_api_key") Start by getting API keys from OpenAI and ElevenLabs . Replace the placeholders in the code with your actual API keys. OpenAI ElevenLabs Step 2: Preparing the Script Your video starts with a story or script. You can replace the story_script variable with the text you want to turn into a video. Here’s an example script about Dogecoin : story_script Dogecoin story_script = """
Dogecoin began as a joke in 2013, inspired by the popular 'Doge' meme featuring a Shiba Inu dog. It unexpectedly gained a massive following thanks to its community's charitable initiatives, eventually evolving into a legitimate cryptocurrency with support from Elon Musk.
""" story_script = """
Dogecoin began as a joke in 2013, inspired by the popular 'Doge' meme featuring a Shiba Inu dog. It unexpectedly gained a massive following thanks to its community's charitable initiatives, eventually evolving into a legitimate cryptocurrency with support from Elon Musk.
""" The script will be split into sentences to match each visual and audio segment. Step 3: Generating Images with OpenAI’s DALL-E For each sentence, we generate a corresponding image using OpenAI’s DALL-E model. def generate_image_from_text(sentence, context, idx):
    prompt = f"Generate an image without any text that describes: {sentence}. Context: {context}"
    response = openai.images.generate(
        model="dall-e-3",
        prompt=prompt,
        size="1024x1792",
        response_format="b64_json"
    )

    image_filename = f"images/image_{idx}.jpg"
    with open(image_filename, "wb") as f:
        f.write(base64.b64decode(response.data[0].b64_json))
    return image_filename def generate_image_from_text(sentence, context, idx):
    prompt = f"Generate an image without any text that describes: {sentence}. Context: {context}"
    response = openai.images.generate(
        model="dall-e-3",
        prompt=prompt,
        size="1024x1792",
        response_format="b64_json"
    )

    image_filename = f"images/image_{idx}.jpg"
    with open(image_filename, "wb") as f:
        f.write(base64.b64decode(response.data[0].b64_json))
    return image_filename This function sends each sentence to DALL-E and saves the generated image. We ensure the generated visuals match the video's theme. Step 4: Generating Voiceovers with ElevenLabs Once we have the visuals, we need voiceovers. ElevenLabs converts each sentence into speech. def generate_audio_from_text(sentence, idx):
    audio = elevenlabs_client.text_to_speech.convert(
        voice_id="pqHfZKP75CvOlQylNhV4",
        model_id="eleven_multilingual_v2",
        text=sentence,
        voice_settings=VoiceSettings(stability=0.2, similarity_boost=0.8)
    )
    audio_filename = f"audio/audio_{idx}.mp3"
    with open(audio_filename, "wb") as f:
        for chunk in audio:
            f.write(chunk)
    return audio_filename def generate_audio_from_text(sentence, idx):
    audio = elevenlabs_client.text_to_speech.convert(
        voice_id="pqHfZKP75CvOlQylNhV4",
        model_id="eleven_multilingual_v2",
        text=sentence,
        voice_settings=VoiceSettings(stability=0.2, similarity_boost=0.8)
    )
    audio_filename = f"audio/audio_{idx}.mp3"
    with open(audio_filename, "wb") as f:
        for chunk in audio:
            f.write(chunk)
    return audio_filename This function generates an audio file for each sentence. You can select different voice settings to customize the narration style. Step 5: Combining Audio and Video Next, we pair each image with its corresponding voiceover using MoviePy : MoviePy from moviepy.editor import ImageClip, AudioFileClip

image_clip = ImageClip(image_path, duration=audio_clip.duration)
image_clip = image_clip.set_audio(audio_clip)
video_clips.append(image_clip.set_fps(30)) from moviepy.editor import ImageClip, AudioFileClip

image_clip = ImageClip(image_path, duration=audio_clip.duration)
image_clip = image_clip.set_audio(audio_clip)
video_clips.append(image_clip.set_fps(30)) Each image is displayed for the duration of its audio clip, ensuring synchronization. Step 6: Applying Video Effects To make the video more dynamic, we apply zoom and fade effects to each image. For example, the apply_zoom_in_center effect slowly zooms into the center of the image: apply_zoom_in_center def apply_zoom_in_center(image_clip, duration):
    return image_clip.resize(lambda t: 1 + 0.04 * t) def apply_zoom_in_center(image_clip, duration):
    return image_clip.resize(lambda t: 1 + 0.04 * t) Other effects include zooming in from the upper part or zooming out. These effects are applied randomly to each clip to keep the video visually engaging. Step 7: Final Video Assembly We combine all video clips into one seamless video and add background music: final_video = concatenate_videoclips(video_clips, method="compose")
final_video.write_videofile(output_video_path, codec="libx264", audio_codec="aac", fps=30) final_video = concatenate_videoclips(video_clips, method="compose")
final_video.write_videofile(output_video_path, codec="libx264", audio_codec="aac", fps=30) Step 8: Adding Captions Captions improve video accessibility and engagement. We use Captacity to automatically add captions based on the audio. Captacity captacity.add_captions(
    video_file=output_video_path,
    output_file="captioned_video.mp4",
    font_size=130,
    font_color="yellow",
    stroke_width=3
) captacity.add_captions(
    video_file=output_video_path,
    output_file="captioned_video.mp4",
    font_size=130,
    font_color="yellow",
    stroke_width=3
) Step 9: Adding Background Music To finish the video, background music is added. The volume is reduced so that it doesn't overpower the narration. background_music = AudioFileClip(music_filename).subclip(0, final_video.duration).volumex(0.2)
narration_audio = final_video.audio.volumex(1.5)
combined_audio = CompositeAudioClip([narration_audio, background_music])
final_video.set_audio(combined_audio) background_music = AudioFileClip(music_filename).subclip(0, final_video.duration).volumex(0.2)
narration_audio = final_video.audio.volumex(1.5)
combined_audio = CompositeAudioClip([narration_audio, background_music])
final_video.set_audio(combined_audio) Conclusion The GitHub repository for this project is available here. The GitHub repository for this project is available here. By using OpenAI and ElevenLabs, we’ve automated the creation of faceless videos from text. You can now quickly generate YouTube Shorts or TikToks without needing a camera or microphone. This automated process has allowed us to create a Faceless Shorts Video service on our Robopost software , offering content creators a seamless way to produce high-quality videos. Whether you are creating educational videos, short stories, or even meme-style content, this service handles everything from visuals to voiceovers with minimal effort. Faceless Shorts Video service Faceless Shorts Video service on our Robopost software Robopost software Now, you can focus on creativity and storytelling while Robopost handles the heavy lifting of video production. Happy creating!

How to Use ElevenLabs and OpenAI to Automate Faceless Shorts Video for YouTube and TikTok

TikTok continues to be a propaganda arm of the United Nations and the World Health Organization: perspective TikTok and the World Health Organization (WHO) enter a one-year partnership to train influencers and promote regime-approved content concerning public health on the social media platform. On the 26th of September, 2024, TikTok put out a press release on the partnership, saying that it was a way for the social media company “to create reliable content and combat misinformation.” “Today, we’re partnering with the World Health Organization (WHO) to create reliable content and combat misinformation through the Fides network, a diverse community of trusted healthcare professionals and content creators”
Tiktok Press Release, September 2024 https://x.com/TikTokComms/status/1839279959061225657?embedable=true Working with the WHO’s Fides network, TikTok will provide training on how to best disseminate WHO propaganda. “Through our collaboration with WHO, we will be engaging Fides creators to translate complex scientific research into relatable and digestible video content, expanding across various health topics. “To further equip creators, we will be working closely with WHO to provide access to creator training programs and resources,” the TikTok press release reads. The WHO’s Fides network consists of some 800 creators and was launched in 2020 with the purpose of “mobilizing health content creators to counter misinformation and elevate evidence-based content.” Today, Fides boasts reaching 150 million users across various platforms. Another part of the WHO-TikTok partnership is to suppress any information that doesn’t align with the unelected globalist health body. “People are increasingly being targeted with misinformation and malinformation on these digital channels. The new collaboration between WHO and TikTok is to help addressing these challenges by promoting evidence-based content and encourage positive health dialogues”
World Health Organization (WHO) Press Release, September 2024 https://x.com/WHO/status/1839355594576409054?embedable=true “This is where WHO can step in to support influencers in delivering evidence-based information, ensuring that health conversations on platforms like TikTok are both impactful and informed”
Dr Alain Labrique, WHO Director of Digital Health and Innovation, September 2024 https://x.com/TimHinchliffe/status/1692214997647077817?embedable=true The WHO also put out a press release on the partnership, explaining how certain influencers would be chosen and targeted to be propagandists for the regime: “The collaboration will expand efforts around a number of relevant health topics, translating science-based information into relatable and digestible video content, with more support for influencers provided through TikTok’s creator training programs.” According to the WHO, the goal of the partnership is to leverage “multiple digital communication platforms to increase outreach to people globally, to promote health literacy, healthy behaviors and actions in an increasingly digitized world.” This isn’t the first time a UN organization has partnered with big tech to deliver its messaging. “We own the science, and we think that the world should know it, and the platforms themselves also do“
UN Comms Director Melissa Fleming, World Economic Forum Sustainable Development Impact Meetings, September 2022 In September 2022, UN Under-Secretary-General for Global Communications Melissa Fleming told a World Economic Forum (WEF) panel on disinformation that the UN had partnered with TikTok on a project called “Team Halo” to boost COVID messaging coming from medical and scientific communities. “Another really key strategy we had was to deploy influencers,” she said, adding, “influencers who were really keen, who have huge followings, but really keen to help carry messages that were going to serve their communities, and they were much more trusted than the United Nations telling them something from New York City headquarters.” “We had another trusted messenger project, which was called ‘Team Halo’ where we trained scientists around the world and some doctors on TikTok, and we had TikTok working with us,” she added. In the same panel, Fleming declared, “We own the science, and we think that the world should know it, and the platforms themselves also do” while bragging about how the UN partnered with Google to manipulate search results, so that only UN-approved messaging would appear at the top. With this partnership, TikTok continues its role as a propaganda arm of the United Nations, of which the WHO is a part. Tim Hinchliffe, Editor, The Sociable TikTok continues to be a propaganda arm of the United Nations and the World Health Organization: perspective TikTok continues to be a propaganda arm of the United Nations and the World Health Organization: perspective TikTok and the World Health Organization (WHO) enter a one-year partnership to train influencers and promote regime-approved content concerning public health on the social media platform. TikTok On the 26th of September, 2024, TikTok put out a press release on the partnership, saying that it was a way for the social media company “ to create reliable content and combat misinformation .” press release to create reliable content and combat misinformation to create reliable content and combat misinformation “Today, we’re partnering with the World Health Organization (WHO) to create reliable content and combat misinformation through the Fides network, a diverse community of trusted healthcare professionals and content creators” Tiktok Press Release, September 2024 “Today, we’re partnering with the World Health Organization (WHO) to create reliable content and combat misinformation through the Fides network, a diverse community of trusted healthcare professionals and content creators” “Today, we’re partnering with the World Health Organization (WHO) to create reliable content and combat misinformation through the Fides network, a diverse community of trusted healthcare professionals and content creators” “Today, we’re partnering with the World Health Organization (WHO) to create reliable content and combat misinformation through the Fides network, a diverse community of trusted healthcare professionals and content creators” Tiktok Press Release, September 2024 https://x.com/TikTokComms/status/1839279959061225657?embedable=true https://x.com/TikTokComms/status/1839279959061225657?embedable=true Working with the WHO’s Fides network , TikTok will provide training on how to best disseminate WHO propaganda. Fides network “ Through our collaboration with WHO, we will be engaging Fides creators to translate complex scientific research into relatable and digestible video content, expanding across various health topics. Through our collaboration with WHO, we will be engaging Fides creators to translate complex scientific research into relatable and digestible video content, expanding across various health topics. Through our collaboration with WHO, we will be engaging Fides creators to translate complex scientific research into relatable and digestible video content, expanding across various health topics. “ To further equip creators, we will be working closely with WHO to provide access to creator training programs and resources ,” the TikTok press release reads. To further equip creators, we will be working closely with WHO to provide access to creator training programs and resources To further equip creators, we will be working closely with WHO to provide access to creator training programs and resources The WHO’s Fides network consists of some 800 creators and was launched in 2020 with the purpose of “mobilizing health content creators to counter misinformation and elevate evidence-based content.” Today, Fides boasts reaching 150 million users across various platforms. Another part of the WHO-TikTok partnership is to suppress any information that doesn’t align with the unelected globalist health body. “People are increasingly being targeted with misinformation and malinformation on these digital channels. The new collaboration between WHO and TikTok is to help addressing these challenges by promoting evidence-based content and encourage positive health dialogues” World Health Organization (WHO) Press Release, September 2024 “People are increasingly being targeted with misinformation and malinformation on these digital channels. The new collaboration between WHO and TikTok is to help addressing these challenges by promoting evidence-based content and encourage positive health dialogues” “People are increasingly being targeted with misinformation and malinformation on these digital channels. The new collaboration between WHO and TikTok is to help addressing these challenges by promoting evidence-based content and encourage positive health dialogues” “People are increasingly being targeted with misinformation and malinformation on these digital channels. The new collaboration between WHO and TikTok is to help addressing these challenges by promoting evidence-based content and encourage positive health dialogues” World Health Organization (WHO) Press Release, September 2024 https://x.com/WHO/status/1839355594576409054?embedable=true https://x.com/WHO/status/1839355594576409054?embedable=true “This is where WHO can step in to support influencers in delivering evidence-based information, ensuring that health conversations on platforms like TikTok are both impactful and informed” Dr Alain Labrique, WHO Director of Digital Health and Innovation, September 2024 “This is where WHO can step in to support influencers in delivering evidence-based information, ensuring that health conversations on platforms like TikTok are both impactful and informed” “This is where WHO can step in to support influencers in delivering evidence-based information, ensuring that health conversations on platforms like TikTok are both impactful and informed” “This is where WHO can step in to support influencers in delivering evidence-based information, ensuring that health conversations on platforms like TikTok are both impactful and informed” Dr Alain Labrique, WHO Director of Digital Health and Innovation, September 2024 https://x.com/TimHinchliffe/status/1692214997647077817?embedable=true https://x.com/TimHinchliffe/status/1692214997647077817?embedable=true The WHO also put out a press release on the partnership, explaining how certain influencers would be chosen and targeted to be propagandists for the regime: press release “ The collaboration will expand efforts around a number of relevant health topics, translating science-based information into relatable and digestible video content, with more support for influencers provided through TikTok’s creator training programs .” The collaboration will expand efforts around a number of relevant health topics, translating science-based information into relatable and digestible video content, with more support for influencers provided through TikTok’s creator training programs The collaboration will expand efforts around a number of relevant health topics, translating science-based information into relatable and digestible video content, with more support for influencers provided through TikTok’s creator training programs According to the WHO, the goal of the partnership is to leverage “multiple digital communication platforms to increase outreach to people globally, to promote health literacy, healthy behaviors and actions in an increasingly digitized world .” “ multiple digital communication platforms to increase outreach to people globally, to promote health literacy, healthy behaviors and actions in an increasingly digitized world multiple digital communication platforms to increase outreach to people globally, to promote health literacy, healthy behaviors and actions in an increasingly digitized world This isn’t the first time a UN organization has partnered with big tech to deliver its messaging. “We own the science, and we think that the world should know it, and the platforms themselves also do“ UN Comms Director Melissa Fleming, World Economic Forum Sustainable Development Impact Meetings, September 2022 “We own the science, and we think that the world should know it, and the platforms themselves also do“ “ We own the science, and we think that the world should know it, and the platforms themselves also do “ We own the science, and we think that the world should know it, and the platforms themselves also do UN Comms Director Melissa Fleming, World Economic Forum Sustainable Development Impact Meetings, September 2022 In September 2022, UN Under-Secretary-General for Global Communications Melissa Fleming told a World Economic Forum (WEF) panel on disinformation that the UN had partnered with TikTok on a project called “ Team Halo ” to boost COVID messaging coming from medical and scientific communities. Team Halo “ Another really key strategy we had was to deploy influencers ,” she said, adding, “ influencers who were really keen, who have huge followings, but really keen to help carry messages that were going to serve their communities, and they were much more trusted than the United Nations telling them something from New York City headquarters .” Another really key strategy we had was to deploy influencers Another really key strategy we had was to deploy influencers influencers who were really keen, who have huge followings, but really keen to help carry messages that were going to serve their communities, and they were much more trusted than the United Nations telling them something from New York City headquarters influencers who were really keen, who have huge followings, but really keen to help carry messages that were going to serve their communities, and they were much more trusted than the United Nations telling them something from New York City headquarters “ We had another trusted messenger project, which was called ‘Team Halo’ where we trained scientists around the world and some doctors on TikTok, and we had TikTok working with us ,” she added. We had another trusted messenger project, which was called ‘Team Halo’ where we trained scientists around the world and some doctors on TikTok, and we had TikTok working with us We had another trusted messenger project, which was called ‘Team Halo’ where we trained scientists around the world and some doctors on TikTok, and we had TikTok working with us In the same panel, Fleming declared, “ We own the science, and we think that the world should know it, and the platforms themselves also do ” while bragging about how the UN partnered with Google to manipulate search results, so that only UN-approved messaging would appear at the top. We own the science, and we think that the world should know it, and the platforms themselves also do We own the science, and we think that the world should know it, and the platforms themselves also do With this partnership, TikTok continues its role as a propaganda arm of the United Nations, of which the WHO is a part. Tim Hinchliffe, Editor, The Sociable Tim Hinchliffe, Editor, The Sociable Tim Hinchliffe , Editor, The Sociable Tim Hinchliffe Tim Hinchliffe

TikTok Teams Up with WHO to Guide Influencers on Public Health Messaging

TikTok জনস্বাস্থ্য বার্তাপ্রেরণে প্রভাবশালীদের গাইড করার জন্য WHO-এর সাথে দল বেঁধেছে

TikTok går sammen med WHO for at vejlede influencers om folkesundhedsmeddelelser

TikTok se asocia con la OMS para orientar a los influencers sobre los mensajes de salud pública

TikTok únese á OMS para guiar aos influencers sobre a mensaxería de saúde pública

TikTokがWHOと提携し、公衆衛生メッセージでインフルエンサーを指導

TikTok sadarbojas ar PVO, lai virzītu ietekmētājus par sabiedrības veselības ziņojumapmaiņu

Miara-miasa amin'ny OMS ny TikTok hitari-dalana ireo mpikatroka amin'ny hafatra momba ny fahasalamam-bahoaka

TikTok e Dirišana le WHO go Hlahla Batho bao ba nago le Tšhušumetšo ka ga Melaetša ya Maphelo a Setšhaba

TikTok współpracuje ze Światową Organizacją Zdrowia, aby udzielać wskazówek influencerom w zakresie komunikatów dotyczących zdrowia publicznego

ټیک ټیک د WHO سره ټیم جوړ کړ ترڅو د عامې روغتیا پیغام رسولو باندې تاثیر کونکو ته لارښود کړي

ቲክቶክ ምስ ውድብ ጥዕና ዓለም ብምትሕብባር ንጸለውቲ ኣብ መልእኽቲ ህዝባዊ ጥዕና ንምምራሕ ይሰርሕ

TikTok JSST bilan birgalikda sog'liqni saqlash xabarlari bo'yicha ta'sir o'tkazuvchilarga rahbarlik qiladi

In Web3 space, where blockchain technology promises to revolutionize everything from finance to entertainment, a common complaint is that Web3 marketing teams lack the expertise to execute effective Web2 marketing campaigns. This often results in an inability to reach and onboard the masses into the Web3 ecosystem. However, one company is breaking that mold and showing the industry how it's done. Cracking the Code: Upland's Success on TikTok Upland, a Web3-based virtual property trading game, has successfully bridged the gap between the traditional Web2 audience and the burgeoning Web3 space. Their secret? A cleverly implemented marketing plan that leverages TikTok, one of the most powerful social media platforms of Web2. Recognizing TikTok's immense potential for reaching and engaging a broad audience, Upland launched a targeted campaign that caught the attention of both TikTok users and gamers alike. In fact, Upland was featured by TikTok for Business as a success story, demonstrating how a Web3 company can effectively utilize Web2 tools to achieve impressive results. Upland's campaign was nothing short of strategic brilliance. They wisely identified TikTok as a crucial platform for attracting long-term players and launched a U.S. campaign focused on Mobile App Installs and App Event Optimization. But Upland didn't stop there; they took it a step further by pivoting their content strategy towards user-generated content (UGC). This move significantly boosted engagement, allowing users to become part of the Upland narrative and creating a sense of community and ownership often missing in traditional marketing efforts. The results were truly remarkable. After expanding their campaign to Brazil and other Spanish-speaking Latin American countries through the TikTok Creative Exchange, Upland saw a staggering increase in user flow—more than 45 times higher than before. The campaign demonstrated that a well-executed Web2 marketing strategy can yield significant results for Web3 companies, with a 23% increase in registration volume and improved cost metrics. A Blueprint for Web3 Success Upland's success on TikTok serves as a blueprint for other Web3 companies looking to scale and onboard new users. It highlights the importance of understanding the dynamics of Web2 platforms and leveraging them to engage with potential users in a way that feels organic and authentic. The lesson here is clear: to succeed in the Web3 world, you need to master the art of Web2 marketing. While debates continue on X (formerly Twitter) about the effectiveness of Web3 marketing teams, Upland's success story on TikTok stands as a testament to what can be achieved when traditional marketing techniques are adapted and implemented in a new environment. The integration of user-generated content, targeted campaigns, and platform-specific strategies has not only resulted in significant growth for Upland but has also set a new standard for how Web3 companies can—and should—approach marketing. Upland's strategy provides a shining example of how to do it right. Upland is more than just a game; it's a masterclass in modern marketing, meeting users where they are and creating impactful campaigns on a platform as significant as TikTok. Don’t forget to like and share the story! Vested Interest Disclosure: This author is an independent contributor publishing via our business blogging program. HackerNoon has reviewed the report for quality, but the claims herein belong to the author. #DYOR. In Web3 space, where blockchain technology promises to revolutionize everything from finance to entertainment, a common complaint is that Web3 marketing teams lack the expertise to execute effective Web2 marketing campaigns. This often results in an inability to reach and onboard the masses into the Web3 ecosystem. However, one company is breaking that mold and showing the industry how it's done. Cracking the Code: Upland's Success on TikTok Upland , a Web3-based virtual property trading game, has successfully bridged the gap between the traditional Web2 audience and the burgeoning Web3 space. Their secret? A cleverly implemented marketing plan that leverages TikTok, one of the most powerful social media platforms of Web2. Upland Recognizing TikTok's immense potential for reaching and engaging a broad audience, Upland launched a targeted campaign that caught the attention of both TikTok users and gamers alike. In fact, Upland was featured by TikTok for Business as a success story, demonstrating how a Web3 company can effectively utilize Web2 tools to achieve impressive results. Upland's campaign was nothing short of strategic brilliance. They wisely identified TikTok as a crucial platform for attracting long-term players and launched a U.S. campaign focused on Mobile App Installs and App Event Optimization. But Upland didn't stop there; they took it a step further by pivoting their content strategy towards user-generated content (UGC). This move significantly boosted engagement, allowing users to become part of the Upland narrative and creating a sense of community and ownership often missing in traditional marketing efforts. The results were truly remarkable. After expanding their campaign to Brazil and other Spanish-speaking Latin American countries through the TikTok Creative Exchange, Upland saw a staggering increase in user flow—more than 45 times higher than before. The campaign demonstrated that a well-executed Web2 marketing strategy can yield significant results for Web3 companies, with a 23% increase in registration volume and improved cost metrics. A Blueprint for Web3 Success Upland's success on TikTok serves as a blueprint for other Web3 companies looking to scale and onboard new users. It highlights the importance of understanding the dynamics of Web2 platforms and leveraging them to engage with potential users in a way that feels organic and authentic. The lesson here is clear: to succeed in the Web3 world, you need to master the art of Web2 marketing. While debates continue on X (formerly Twitter) about the effectiveness of Web3 marketing teams, Upland's success story on TikTok stands as a testament to what can be achieved when traditional marketing techniques are adapted and implemented in a new environment. The integration of user-generated content, targeted campaigns, and platform-specific strategies has not only resulted in significant growth for Upland but has also set a new standard for how Web3 companies can—and should—approach marketing. Upland's strategy provides a shining example of how to do it right. Upland is more than just a game; it's a masterclass in modern marketing, meeting users where they are and creating impactful campaigns on a platform as significant as TikTok. Don’t forget to like and share the story! Vested Interest Disclosure: This author is an independent contributor publishing via our business blogging program. HackerNoon has reviewed the report for quality, but the claims herein belong to the author. #DYOR. Vested Interest Disclosure: This author is an independent contributor publishing via our business blogging program . HackerNoon has reviewed the report for quality, but the claims herein belong to the author. #DYOR. Vested Interest Disclosure: business blogging program business blogging program

Upland's Marketing Strategy Takes TikTok by Storm

Upland এর বিপণন কৌশল ঝড় দ্বারা TikTok নেয়

Uplands Marketingstrategie erobert TikTok im Sturm

La estrategia de marketing de Upland arrasa en TikTok

La stratégie marketing d'Upland prend d'assaut TikTok

अपलैंड की मार्केटिंग रणनीति ने टिकटॉक को तूफान में धकेल दिया

アップランドのマーケティング戦略がTikTokを席巻

Upland의 마케팅 전략이 TikTok을 폭풍으로 몰아넣었습니다.

A estratégia de marketing da Upland conquista o TikTok como uma tempestade

Маркетинговая стратегия Upland покорила TikTok

Upland'ın Pazarlama Stratejisi TikTok'u Storm'dan Alıyor

Chiến lược tiếp thị của Upland đánh bại TikTok

Upland 的营销策略让 TikTok 大获成功

TikTok and Diagnosing Mental Illness: Would You Please Kindly Shut Up About ADHD

TikTok এবং মানসিক অসুস্থতা নির্ণয়: আপনি কি দয়া করে ADHD সম্পর্কে চুপ করবেন

TikTok und die Diagnose psychischer Erkrankungen: Würden Sie bitte den Mund halten, wenn es um ADHS geht?

TikTok y el diagnóstico de enfermedades mentales: ¿podría por favor callarse sobre el TDAH?

TikTok et le diagnostic de la maladie mentale : pourriez-vous, s'il vous plaît, vous taire à propos du TDAH

TikTok और मानसिक बीमारी का निदान: क्या आप कृपया ADHD के बारे में चुप रहेंगे?

TikTokと精神疾患の診断：ADHDについては黙っててください

TikTok 및 정신 질환 진단: ADHD에 대해 조용히 말씀해 주시겠어요?

TikTok e diagnóstico de doenças mentais: você poderia, por favor, calar a boca sobre o TDAH

TikTok и диагностика психических заболеваний: не могли бы вы, пожалуйста, помолчать о СДВГ?

TikTok ve Akıl Hastalıklarının Teşhisi: Lütfen DEHB Konusunda Çenenizi Kapatır Mısınız?

TikTok và chẩn đoán bệnh tâm thần: Bạn vui lòng im lặng về ADHD

TikTok 与精神疾病诊断：请你闭嘴，不要再谈论多动症了

Tiktok Inc., and ByteDance LTD., v. Merrick B. Garland Update Court Filing, retrieved on May 7, 2024, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This part is 9 of 11. Ground 3: Violation of Equal Protection 104. The Act also violates Petitioners’ rights under the equal protection component of the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause because it singles Petitioners out for adverse treatment without any reason for doing so. 105. First, the Act deems any application offered by Petitioners to be a “foreign adversary controlled application” without notice or a presidential determination. Sec. 2(g)(3)(A). By contrast, applications offered by other companies “controlled by a foreign adversary” are deemed to be “foreign adversary controlled applications” only after notice and a presidential determination that those companies present “significant threat[s]” to U.S. national security, a determination that must be supported by evidence submitted to Congress. Sec. 2(g)(2)(B); see supra ¶ 34(d). 106. That distinction imposes a dramatically heavier burden on Petitioners’ free speech rights without any justification. The Act precludes the government from burdening the speech rights of any speakers other than Petitioners unless and until the President issues a public report on the specific national security concerns animating the President’s decision, provides support for that decision, and describes the assets requiring divestiture. Those protections ensure that the President must, at the very least, provide a detailed national security justification for his or her actions before burdening other speakers’ speech — a justification that then will provide the basis for judicial review. The Act imposes none of those requirements as a precondition for burdening Petitioners’ speech — it levies that burden by unexplained legislative fiat. 107. Second, the Act denies Petitioners the exemption available to any other company that is purportedly “controlled by a foreign adversary.” As noted, any application Petitioners offer is ipso facto deemed a “foreign adversary controlled application.” By contrast, other companies “controlled by a foreign adversary” are exempt from the Act’s definition of a “covered company,” and thus from the Act’s requirements, so long as they offer at least one application with the “primary purpose” of “allow[ing] users to post product reviews, business reviews, or travel information and reviews.” Sec. 2(g)(2)(B). 108. There is no conceivable reason for treating Petitioners differently than all other similarly situated companies. Even if Congress had valid interests in protecting U.S. users’ data and controlling what content may be disseminated through global platforms that would be advanced through the Act, there is no reason why those concerns would support a ban on Petitioners’ platforms without corresponding bans on other platforms. Nor is there any rational reason why Congress would ban Petitioners’ platforms while allowing any other company “controlled by a foreign adversary” — regardless of the national security threat posed by that company — to sidestep the Act’s reach by simply offering an application that “allows users to post product reviews, business reviews, or travel information and reviews,” but changing nothing else about the company’s operations, ownership structure, or other applications. 109. By treating Petitioners differently from others similarly situated, the Act denies Petitioners the equal protection of the law. Continue Reading Here. About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.
This court case retrieved on May 7, 2024, from sf16-va.tiktokcdn.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. Lead image by Solen Feyissa on Unsplash Tiktok Inc., and ByteDance LTD., v. Merrick B. Garland Update Court Filing, retrieved on May 7, 2024, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This part is 9 of 11. Tiktok Inc., and ByteDance LTD., v. Merrick B. Garland Update Court Filing, retrieved on May 7, 2024, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series . You can jump to any part in this filing here . This part is 9 of 11. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here Ground 3: Violation of Equal Protection 104. The Act also violates Petitioners’ rights under the equal protection component of the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause because it singles Petitioners out for adverse treatment without any reason for doing so. 105. First, the Act deems any application offered by Petitioners to be a “foreign adversary controlled application” without notice or a presidential determination. Sec. 2(g)(3)(A). By contrast, applications offered by other companies “controlled by a foreign adversary” are deemed to be “foreign adversary controlled applications” only after notice and a presidential determination that those companies present “significant threat[s]” to U.S. national security, a determination that must be supported by evidence submitted to Congress. Sec. 2(g)(2)(B); see supra ¶ 34(d). 106. That distinction imposes a dramatically heavier burden on Petitioners’ free speech rights without any justification. The Act precludes the government from burdening the speech rights of any speakers other than Petitioners unless and until the President issues a public report on the specific national security concerns animating the President’s decision, provides support for that decision, and describes the assets requiring divestiture. Those protections ensure that the President must, at the very least, provide a detailed national security justification for his or her actions before burdening other speakers’ speech — a justification that then will provide the basis for judicial review. The Act imposes none of those requirements as a precondition for burdening Petitioners’ speech — it levies that burden by unexplained legislative fiat. 107. Second, the Act denies Petitioners the exemption available to any other company that is purportedly “controlled by a foreign adversary.” As noted, any application Petitioners offer is ipso facto deemed a “foreign adversary controlled application.” By contrast, other companies “controlled by a foreign adversary” are exempt from the Act’s definition of a “covered company,” and thus from the Act’s requirements, so long as they offer at least one application with the “primary purpose” of “allow[ing] users to post product reviews, business reviews, or travel information and reviews.” Sec. 2(g)(2)(B). 108. There is no conceivable reason for treating Petitioners differently than all other similarly situated companies. Even if Congress had valid interests in protecting U.S. users’ data and controlling what content may be disseminated through global platforms that would be advanced through the Act, there is no reason why those concerns would support a ban on Petitioners’ platforms without corresponding bans on other platforms. Nor is there any rational reason why Congress would ban Petitioners’ platforms while allowing any other company “controlled by a foreign adversary” — regardless of the national security threat posed by that company — to sidestep the Act’s reach by simply offering an application that “allows users to post product reviews, business reviews, or travel information and reviews,” but changing nothing else about the company’s operations, ownership structure, or other applications. 109. By treating Petitioners differently from others similarly situated, the Act denies Petitioners the equal protection of the law. Continue Reading Here. Continue Reading Here . Here About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case retrieved on May 7, 2024, from sf16-va.tiktokcdn.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case retrieved on May 7, 2024, from sf16-va.tiktokcdn.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. sf16-va.tiktokcdn.com Lead image by Solen Feyissa on Unsplash Lead image by Solen Feyissa on Unsplash Solen Feyissa on Unsplash

TikTok Challenges Ban, Cites Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause

Tiktok Inc., and ByteDance LTD., v. Merrick B. Garland Update Court Filing, retrieved on May 7, 2024, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This part is 11 of 11. Requested Relief Petitioners respectfully request that this Court grant the following relief: A. Issue a declaratory judgment that the Act violates the U.S. Constitution; B. Issue an order enjoining the Attorney General from enforcing the Act; C. Enter judgment in favor of Petitioners; and D. Grant any further relief that may be appropriate. About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.
This court case retrieved on May 7, 2024, from sf16-va.tiktokcdn.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. Lead image by Solen Feyissa on Unsplash Tiktok Inc., and ByteDance LTD., v. Merrick B. Garland Update Court Filing, retrieved on May 7, 2024, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This part is 11 of 11. Tiktok Inc., and ByteDance LTD., v. Merrick B. Garland Update Court Filing, retrieved on May 7, 2024, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series . You can jump to any part in this filing here . This part is 11 of 11. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here Requested Relief Petitioners respectfully request that this Court grant the following relief: A. Issue a declaratory judgment that the Act violates the U.S. Constitution; B. Issue an order enjoining the Attorney General from enforcing the Act; C. Enter judgment in favor of Petitioners; and D. Grant any further relief that may be appropriate. About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case retrieved on May 7, 2024, from sf16-va.tiktokcdn.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case retrieved on May 7, 2024, from sf16-va.tiktokcdn.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. sf16-va.tiktokcdn.com Lead image by Solen Feyissa on Unsplash Lead image by Solen Feyissa on Unsplash Solen Feyissa on Unsplash

TikTok Asks Court to Deem its Ban Unconstitutional 

Tiktok Inc., and ByteDance LTD., v. Merrick B. Garland Update Court Filing, retrieved on May 7, 2024, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This part is 8 of 11. Ground 2: Unconstitutional Bill of Attainder 95. The Act is an unconstitutional bill of attainder. 96. Article I of the U.S. Constitution prohibits Congress from passing any bill of attainder. U.S. Const. art. I § 9, cl. 3 (“No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.”). A bill of attainder is “legislative punishment, of any form or severity, of specifically designated persons or groups.” United States v. Brown, 381 U.S. 437, 447 (1965). The protection against bills of attainder is “an implementation of the separation of powers, a general safeguard against legislative exercise of the judicial function, or more simply — trial by legislature.” Id. at 442. 97. By singling out Petitioners for legislative punishment, the Act is an unconstitutional bill of attainder. 98. The Act inflicts “pains and penalties” that historically have been associated with bills of attainder. See Nixon v. Adm’r of Gen. Servs., 433 U.S. 425, 474 (1977). Historically, common “pains and penalties” included “punitive confiscation of property by the sovereign” and “a legislative enactment barring designated individuals or groups from participation in specified employments or vocations,” among others. Id. As described above, the Act confiscates Petitioners’ U.S. businesses by forcing ByteDance to shutter them within 270 days or sell on terms that are not commercially, technologically, or legally feasible. See supra ¶¶ 26‒29. For the same reason, the Act bars Petitioners from operating in their chosen line of business. 99. “[V]iewed in terms of the type and severity of burdens imposed” on Petitioners, the Act’s treatment of Petitioners cannot “reasonably . . . be said to further nonpunitive legislative purposes.” Nixon, 433 U.S. at 475–76. The Act transforms Petitioners into a “vilified class” by explicitly prohibiting their current and future operations in the United States, without qualification or limitation, but does not extend the same treatment to other similarly situated companies. Foretich v. United States, 351 F.3d 1198, 1224 (D.C. Cir. 2003). 100. Moreover, in light of the less restrictive alternatives discussed above, there is no justification for automatically barring Petitioners’ current and future operations in the United States (or those of its subsidiaries or successors) in perpetuity without providing them a meaningful opportunity to take corrective action. See Kaspersky Lab, Inc. v. U.S. Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 909 F.3d 446, 456 (D.C. Cir. 2018). Indeed, the Act imposes this punishment uniquely on Petitioners without the process, and presidential determination of a significant national security threat, that Congress has afforded to everyone else. Expressly singling out Petitioners for these punitive burdens while at the same time adopting a statutory standard and decision-making process applicable to every other entity makes clear that Petitioners are subjected to a prohibited legislatively imposed punishment. 101. Moreover, while Petitioners can avoid the Act’s prohibitions only via a wholesale divestment, all other companies — even those with Chinese ownership and determined by the President to present a “significant threat” to U.S. national security — can avoid prohibition simply by operating a website or an application “whose primary purpose is to allow users to post product reviews, business reviews, or travel information and reviews.” Sec. 2(g)(2)(b). 102. Indeed, any other “adversary-controlled” company that operates an application exactly like TikTok, but also operates a website the primary purpose of which is to post product reviews, is left untouched, leaving a ready path for any company but those affiliated with Petitioners to circumvent the Act’s prohibitions altogether. For all practical purposes, then, the Act applies to just one corporate group — it is a “TikTok bill,” as congressional leaders have described it.[30] 103. For all of these reasons, the Act constitutes an unconstitutional bill of attainder. Continue Reading Here. About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.
This court case retrieved on May 7, 2024, from sf16-va.tiktokcdn.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. [30] Rachel Dobkin, Mike Johnson’s Letter Sparks New Flood of Republican Backlash, Newsweek (Apr. 17, 2024), https://perma.cc/Z5HD-7UVU (quoting letter from Speaker Johnson referencing the “TikTok bill”); Senator Chuck Schumer, Majority Leader, to Colleagues (Apr. 5, 2024), https://perma.cc/J7Q4-9PGJ (referencing “TikTok legislation”). Tiktok Inc., and ByteDance LTD., v. Merrick B. Garland Update Court Filing, retrieved on May 7, 2024, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This part is 8 of 11. Tiktok Inc., and ByteDance LTD., v. Merrick B. Garland Update Court Filing, retrieved on May 7, 2024, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series . You can jump to any part in this filing here . This part is 8 of 11. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here Ground 2: Unconstitutional Bill of Attainder 95. The Act is an unconstitutional bill of attainder. 96. Article I of the U.S. Constitution prohibits Congress from passing any bill of attainder. U.S. Const. art. I § 9, cl. 3 (“No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.”). A bill of attainder is “legislative punishment, of any form or severity, of specifically designated persons or groups.” United States v. Brown, 381 U.S. 437, 447 (1965). The protection against bills of attainder is “an implementation of the separation of powers, a general safeguard against legislative exercise of the judicial function, or more simply — trial by legislature.” Id. at 442. 97. By singling out Petitioners for legislative punishment, the Act is an unconstitutional bill of attainder. 98. The Act inflicts “pains and penalties” that historically have been associated with bills of attainder. See Nixon v. Adm’r of Gen. Servs., 433 U.S. 425, 474 (1977). Historically, common “pains and penalties” included “punitive confiscation of property by the sovereign” and “a legislative enactment barring designated individuals or groups from participation in specified employments or vocations,” among others. Id. As described above, the Act confiscates Petitioners’ U.S. businesses by forcing ByteDance to shutter them within 270 days or sell on terms that are not commercially, technologically, or legally feasible. See supra ¶¶ 26‒29. For the same reason, the Act bars Petitioners from operating in their chosen line of business. 99. “[V]iewed in terms of the type and severity of burdens imposed” on Petitioners, the Act’s treatment of Petitioners cannot “reasonably . . . be said to further nonpunitive legislative purposes.” Nixon, 433 U.S. at 475–76. The Act transforms Petitioners into a “vilified class” by explicitly prohibiting their current and future operations in the United States, without qualification or limitation, but does not extend the same treatment to other similarly situated companies. Foretich v. United States, 351 F.3d 1198, 1224 (D.C. Cir. 2003). 100. Moreover, in light of the less restrictive alternatives discussed above, there is no justification for automatically barring Petitioners’ current and future operations in the United States (or those of its subsidiaries or successors) in perpetuity without providing them a meaningful opportunity to take corrective action. See Kaspersky Lab, Inc. v. U.S. Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 909 F.3d 446, 456 (D.C. Cir. 2018). Indeed, the Act imposes this punishment uniquely on Petitioners without the process, and presidential determination of a significant national security threat, that Congress has afforded to everyone else. Expressly singling out Petitioners for these punitive burdens while at the same time adopting a statutory standard and decision-making process applicable to every other entity makes clear that Petitioners are subjected to a prohibited legislatively imposed punishment. 101. Moreover, while Petitioners can avoid the Act’s prohibitions only via a wholesale divestment, all other companies — even those with Chinese ownership and determined by the President to present a “significant threat” to U.S. national security — can avoid prohibition simply by operating a website or an application “whose primary purpose is to allow users to post product reviews, business reviews, or travel information and reviews.” Sec. 2(g)(2)(b). 102. Indeed, any other “adversary-controlled” company that operates an application exactly like TikTok, but also operates a website the primary purpose of which is to post product reviews, is left untouched, leaving a ready path for any company but those affiliated with Petitioners to circumvent the Act’s prohibitions altogether. For all practical purposes, then, the Act applies to just one corporate group — it is a “TikTok bill,” as congressional leaders have described it.[30] 103. For all of these reasons, the Act constitutes an unconstitutional bill of attainder. Continue Reading Here. Continue Reading Here . Here About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case retrieved on May 7, 2024, from sf16-va.tiktokcdn.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case retrieved on May 7, 2024, from sf16-va.tiktokcdn.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. sf16-va.tiktokcdn.com [30] Rachel Dobkin, Mike Johnson’s Letter Sparks New Flood of Republican Backlash, Newsweek (Apr. 17, 2024), https://perma.cc/Z5HD-7UVU (quoting letter from Speaker Johnson referencing the “TikTok bill”); Senator Chuck Schumer, Majority Leader, to Colleagues (Apr. 5, 2024), https://perma.cc/J7Q4-9PGJ (referencing “TikTok legislation”).

TikTok U.S. Lawsuit: Understanding the Prohibition of Bills of Attainder in Constitutional Law

The First Amendment Implications of TikTok's Ban

Tiktok Inc., and ByteDance LTD., v. Merrick B. Garland Update Court Filing, retrieved on May 7, 2024,  is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This part is 6 of 11. E. Congress Disregarded Alternatives to Banning TikTok, Such as the National Security Measures Petitioners Negotiated with the Executive Branch. 41. Petitioners have demonstrated a commitment to addressing both of those concerns without the need to resort to the drastic, unconstitutional step of shuttering one of the most widely used forums for speech in the United States. The 90-page draft National Security Agreement that Petitioners developed with CFIUS would, if implemented, provide U.S. TikTok users with protections more robust than those employed by any other widely used online platform in the industry. 42. The draft National Security Agreement contains several means of ensuring data security without banning TikTok. All protected U.S. user data (as defined in the National Security Agreement) would be safeguarded in the United States under a special corporate structure: TikTok U.S. Data Security (a new subsidiary of TikTok Inc.). A special board, with Security Directors whose appointment would be subject to the U.S. government’s approval, would oversee TikTok U.S. Data Security, and in turn exclude ByteDance and all of its other subsidiaries and affiliates from such responsibilities. Further separation between the U.S. TikTok business and ByteDance subsidiaries and affiliates, including TikTok in the rest of the world, would be achieved by appointing a U.S.-government-approved Security Director to the board of TikTok Inc. Protected U.S. user data would be stored in the cloud environment of a U.S.-government-approved partner, Oracle Corporation, with access to such data managed by TikTok U.S. Data Security. 43. The draft Agreement would also protect against the concern about content manipulation and propaganda. Multiple layers of protection address concerns related to content available on the TikTok platform, including ensuring that all content moderation — both human and algorithmic — would be subject to third-party verification and monitoring. The concern about content manipulation would also be addressed by securing all software code through Oracle Corporation, a U.S. trusted technology provider. The TikTok U.S. platform and application would be deployed through the Oracle cloud infrastructure and subject to source code review and vetting by Oracle with another U.S.-government-approved third party responsible for conducting security inspections. As part of this process, Oracle and third parties approved by CFIUS would conduct independent inspections of the TikTok recommendation engine. 44. The draft Agreement also includes strict penalties for noncompliance, including a “shut-down option,” giving the government the authority to suspend TikTok in the United States in response to specified acts of noncompliance. The Agreement also provides significant monetary penalties and other remedies for noncompliance. 45. Although the government has apparently abandoned the draft National Security Agreement, Petitioners have not. TikTok Inc. has begun the process of voluntarily implementing the National Security Agreement’s provisions to the extent it can do so without the U.S. government’s cooperation, including by incorporating and staffing the TikTok U.S. Data Security entity, and by partnering with Oracle Corporation on the migration of the U.S. platform and protected U.S. user data to Oracle’s cloud environment. 46. To date, Petitioners have spent more than $2 billion to implement these measures and resolve the very concerns publicly expressed by congressional supporters of the Act — all without the overbroad and unconstitutional method of an outright ban. Continue Reading Here. About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.
This court case retrieved on May 7, 2024, from sf16-va.tiktokcdn.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. Lead image by Solen Feyissa on Unsplash Tiktok Inc., and ByteDance LTD., v. Merrick B. Garland Update Court Filing, retrieved on May 7, 2024,  is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This part is 6 of 11. Tiktok Inc., and ByteDance LTD., v. Merrick B. Garland Update Court Filing, retrieved on May 7, 2024,  is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series . You can jump to any part in this filing here . This part is 6 of 11. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here E. Congress Disregarded Alternatives to Banning TikTok, Such as the National Security Measures Petitioners Negotiated with the Executive Branch. 41. Petitioners have demonstrated a commitment to addressing both of those concerns without the need to resort to the drastic, unconstitutional step of shuttering one of the most widely used forums for speech in the United States. The 90-page draft National Security Agreement that Petitioners developed with CFIUS would, if implemented, provide U.S. TikTok users with protections more robust than those employed by any other widely used online platform in the industry. 42. The draft National Security Agreement contains several means of ensuring data security without banning TikTok. All protected U.S. user data (as defined in the National Security Agreement) would be safeguarded in the United States under a special corporate structure: TikTok U.S. Data Security (a new subsidiary of TikTok Inc.). A special board, with Security Directors whose appointment would be subject to the U.S. government’s approval, would oversee TikTok U.S. Data Security, and in turn exclude ByteDance and all of its other subsidiaries and affiliates from such responsibilities. Further separation between the U.S. TikTok business and ByteDance subsidiaries and affiliates, including TikTok in the rest of the world, would be achieved by appointing a U.S.-government-approved Security Director to the board of TikTok Inc. Protected U.S. user data would be stored in the cloud environment of a U.S.-government-approved partner, Oracle Corporation, with access to such data managed by TikTok U.S. Data Security. 43. The draft Agreement would also protect against the concern about content manipulation and propaganda. Multiple layers of protection address concerns related to content available on the TikTok platform, including ensuring that all content moderation — both human and algorithmic — would be subject to third-party verification and monitoring. The concern about content manipulation would also be addressed by securing all software code through Oracle Corporation, a U.S. trusted technology provider. The TikTok U.S. platform and application would be deployed through the Oracle cloud infrastructure and subject to source code review and vetting by Oracle with another U.S.-government-approved third party responsible for conducting security inspections. As part of this process, Oracle and third parties approved by CFIUS would conduct independent inspections of the TikTok recommendation engine. 44. The draft Agreement also includes strict penalties for noncompliance, including a “shut-down option,” giving the government the authority to suspend TikTok in the United States in response to specified acts of noncompliance. The Agreement also provides significant monetary penalties and other remedies for noncompliance. 45. Although the government has apparently abandoned the draft National Security Agreement, Petitioners have not. TikTok Inc. has begun the process of voluntarily implementing the National Security Agreement’s provisions to the extent it can do so without the U.S. government’s cooperation, including by incorporating and staffing the TikTok U.S. Data Security entity, and by partnering with Oracle Corporation on the migration of the U.S. platform and protected U.S. user data to Oracle’s cloud environment. 46. To date, Petitioners have spent more than $2 billion to implement these measures and resolve the very concerns publicly expressed by congressional supporters of the Act — all without the overbroad and unconstitutional method of an outright ban. Continue Reading Here. Continue Reading Here . Here About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case retrieved on May 7, 2024, from sf16-va.tiktokcdn.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case retrieved on May 7, 2024, from sf16-va.tiktokcdn.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. sf16-va.tiktokcdn.com Lead image by Solen Feyissa on Unsplash Lead image by Solen Feyissa on Unsplash Solen Feyissa on Unsplash

TikTok Proposes Robust National Security Measures as Viable Alternative to Banning

Tiktok Inc., and ByteDance LTD., v. Merrick B. Garland Update Court Filing, retrieved on May 7, 2024, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This part is 4 of 11. C. A Divestiture that Severs TikTok’s U.S. Operations From the Rest of the Globally Integrated TikTok Business Is Not Commercially, Technologically, or Legally Feasible. 26. The Act purports to allow Petitioners to avoid a ban by executing a “qualified divestiture.” Sec. 2(c). But that alternative is illusory because, as Petitioners have repeatedly explained to CFIUS, the divestiture of the TikTok U.S. business and its severance from the globally integrated platform of which it is an integral part is not commercially, technologically, or legally feasible. 27. First, a standalone U.S. TikTok platform would not be commercially viable. TikTok and its competitors are globally integrated platforms where content created in one country is available to users in other countries. Indeed, a substantial part of TikTok’s appeal is the richness of the international content available on the platform — from global sporting events like the Olympics to international K-pop stars from South Korea, as well as videos created by U.S. creators and enjoyed by audiences worldwide. A divestment of the U.S. TikTok platform, without any operational relationship with the remainder of the global platform, would preclude the interoperability necessary to make international content seamlessly available in the U.S. market and vice versa. As a result, the U.S. TikTok platform would become an “island” where Americans would have an experience detached from the rest of the global platform and its over 1 billion users. Such a limited pool of content, in turn, would dramatically undermine the value and viability of the U.S. TikTok business.[4] 28. Second, precipitously moving all TikTok source code development from ByteDance to a new TikTok owner would be impossible as a technological matter. The platform consists of millions of lines of software code that have been painstakingly developed by thousands of engineers over multiple years. Although much of this code is basic infrastructure for running the global TikTok platform and has nothing at all to do with TikTok’s recommendation algorithm, the statute requires that all of this code be wrested from Petitioners, so that there is no “operational relationship” between ByteDance and the new U.S. platform. Specifically, to comply with the law’s divestiture requirement, that code base would have to be moved to a large, alternative team of engineers — a team that does not exist and would have no understanding of the complex code necessary to run the platform. It would take years for an entirely new set of engineers to gain sufficient familiarity with the source code to perform the ongoing, necessary maintenance and development activities for the platform. Moreover, to keep the platform functioning, these engineers would need access to ByteDance software tools, which the Act prohibits. Such a fundamental rearchitecting is not remotely feasible on anything approaching the 270-day timeframe contemplated by the Act. 29. Third, the Chinese government has made clear that it would not permit a divestment of the recommendation engine that is a key to the success of TikTok in the United States. Like the United States,[5] China regulates the export of certain technologies originating there. China’s export control rules cover “information processing technologies” such as “personal interactive data algorithms.”[6] China’s official news agency has reported that under these rules, any sale of recommendation algorithms developed by engineers employed by ByteDance subsidiaries in China, including for TikTok, would require a government license.[7] China also enacted an additional export control law that “gives the Chinese government new policy tools and justifications to deny and impose terms on foreign commercial transactions.”[8] China adopted these enhanced export control restrictions between August and October 2020, shortly after President Trump’s August 6, 2020 and August 14, 2020 executive orders targeting TikTok. By doing so, the Chinese government clearly signaled that it would assert its export control powers with respect to any attempt to sever TikTok’s operations from ByteDance, and that any severance would leave TikTok without access to the recommendation engine that has created a unique style and community that cannot be replicated on any other platform today. Continue Reading Here. About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.
This court case retrieved on May 7, 2024, from sf16-va.tiktokcdn.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. [4] The contemplated qualified divestiture would also undercut the important role currently played by American voices in the global conversation ongoing on TikTok. [5] For example, the U.S. Department of Commerce has issued restrictions on the export to China of advanced chips that can be used to train artificial intelligence models. E.g., Implementation of Additional Export Controls: Certain Advanced Computing Items; Supercomputer and Semiconductor End Use; Updates and Corrections, 88 Fed. Reg. 73458 (Oct. 25, 2023) (to be codified at 15 C.F.R. § 732.2 et seq.). [6] See Karen M. Sutter, Cong. Rsch. Serv., IN11524, China Issues New Export Control Law and Related Policies 2 (2020). [7] Paul Mozur, Raymond Zhong & David McCabe, TikTok Deal Is Complicated by New Rules From China Over Tech Exports, N.Y. Times (Aug. 29, 2020), https://perma.cc/L6RB-CTT9. [8] Sutter, supra n.6. Lead image by Solen Feyissa on Unsplash Tiktok Inc., and ByteDance LTD., v. Merrick B. Garland Update Court Filing, retrieved on May 7, 2024, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This part is 4 of 11. Tiktok Inc., and ByteDance LTD., v. Merrick B. Garland Update Court Filing, retrieved on May 7, 2024, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series . You can jump to any part in this filing here . This part is 4 of 11. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here C. A Divestiture that Severs TikTok’s U.S. Operations From the Rest of the Globally Integrated TikTok Business Is Not Commercially, Technologically, or Legally Feasible. 26. The Act purports to allow Petitioners to avoid a ban by executing a “qualified divestiture.” Sec. 2(c). But that alternative is illusory because, as Petitioners have repeatedly explained to CFIUS, the divestiture of the TikTok U.S. business and its severance from the globally integrated platform of which it is an integral part is not commercially, technologically, or legally feasible. 27. First , a standalone U.S. TikTok platform would not be commercially viable. TikTok and its competitors are globally integrated platforms where content created in one country is available to users in other countries. Indeed, a substantial part of TikTok’s appeal is the richness of the international content available on the platform — from global sporting events like the Olympics to international K-pop stars from South Korea, as well as videos created by U.S. creators and enjoyed by audiences worldwide. A divestment of the U.S. TikTok platform, without any operational relationship with the remainder of the global platform, would preclude the interoperability necessary to make international content seamlessly available in the U.S. market and vice versa. As a result, the U.S. TikTok platform would become an “island” where Americans would have an experience detached from the rest of the global platform and its over 1 billion users. Such a limited pool of content, in turn, would dramatically undermine the value and viability of the U.S. TikTok business.[4] First 28. Second , precipitously moving all TikTok source code development from ByteDance to a new TikTok owner would be impossible as a technological matter. The platform consists of millions of lines of software code that have been painstakingly developed by thousands of engineers over multiple years. Although much of this code is basic infrastructure for running the global TikTok platform and has nothing at all to do with TikTok’s recommendation algorithm, the statute requires that all of this code be wrested from Petitioners, so that there is no “operational relationship” between ByteDance and the new U.S. platform. Specifically, to comply with the law’s divestiture requirement, that code base would have to be moved to a large, alternative team of engineers — a team that does not exist and would have no understanding of the complex code necessary to run the platform. It would take years for an entirely new set of engineers to gain sufficient familiarity with the source code to perform the ongoing, necessary maintenance and development activities for the platform. Moreover, to keep the platform functioning, these engineers would need access to ByteDance software tools, which the Act prohibits. Such a fundamental rearchitecting is not remotely feasible on anything approaching the 270-day timeframe contemplated by the Act. Second 29. Third , the Chinese government has made clear that it would not permit a divestment of the recommendation engine that is a key to the success of TikTok in the United States. Like the United States,[5] China regulates the export of certain technologies originating there. China’s export control rules cover “information processing technologies” such as “personal interactive data algorithms.”[6] China’s official news agency has reported that under these rules, any sale of recommendation algorithms developed by engineers employed by ByteDance subsidiaries in China, including for TikTok, would require a government license.[7] China also enacted an additional export control law that “gives the Chinese government new policy tools and justifications to deny and impose terms on foreign commercial transactions.”[8] China adopted these enhanced export control restrictions between August and October 2020, shortly after President Trump’s August 6, 2020 and August 14, 2020 executive orders targeting TikTok. By doing so, the Chinese government clearly signaled that it would assert its export control powers with respect to any attempt to sever TikTok’s operations from ByteDance, and that any severance would leave TikTok without access to the recommendation engine that has created a unique style and community that cannot be replicated on any other platform today. Third Continue Reading Here. Continue Reading Here . Here About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case retrieved on May 7, 2024, from sf16-va.tiktokcdn.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case retrieved on May 7, 2024, from sf16-va.tiktokcdn.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. sf16-va.tiktokcdn.com [4] The contemplated qualified divestiture would also undercut the important role currently played by American voices in the global conversation ongoing on TikTok. [5] For example, the U.S. Department of Commerce has issued restrictions on the export to China of advanced chips that can be used to train artificial intelligence models. E.g., Implementation of Additional Export Controls: Certain Advanced Computing Items; Supercomputer and Semiconductor End Use; Updates and Corrections, 88 Fed. Reg. 73458 (Oct. 25, 2023) (to be codified at 15 C.F.R. § 732.2 et seq.). [6] See Karen M. Sutter, Cong. Rsch. Serv., IN11524, China Issues New Export Control Law and Related Policies 2 (2020). [7] Paul Mozur, Raymond Zhong & David McCabe, TikTok Deal Is Complicated by New Rules From China Over Tech Exports, N.Y. Times (Aug. 29, 2020), https://perma.cc/L6RB-CTT9. [8] Sutter, supra n.6. Lead image by Solen Feyissa on Unsplash Lead image by Solen Feyissa on Unsplash Solen Feyissa on Unsplash

Stories, News & Mentions about TIKTOK

Tiktok’s Stories on HackerNoon

Tiktok's News & Mentions