InsightHxis in the Healthcare IT Industry

InsightHx

Generative AI: Expert Insights on Evolution, Challenges, and Future Trends

জেনারেটিভ এআই: বিবর্তন, চ্যালেঞ্জ এবং ভবিষ্যত প্রবণতা সম্পর্কে বিশেষজ্ঞের অন্তর্দৃষ্টি

Generative KI: Experteneinblicke in Entwicklung, Herausforderungen und zukünftige Trends

IA generativa: opiniones de expertos sobre la evolución, los desafíos y las tendencias futuras

IA générative : avis d'experts sur l'évolution, les défis et les tendances futures

जनरेटिव एआई: विकास, चुनौतियों और भविष्य के रुझानों पर विशेषज्ञ अंतर्दृष्टि

生成型 AI: 進化、課題、将来の動向に関する専門家の見解

생성적 AI: 진화, 과제 및 미래 동향에 대한 전문가의 통찰력

IA generativa: insights de especialistas sobre evolução, desafios e tendências futuras

Генеративный ИИ: экспертные взгляды на эволюцию, проблемы и будущие тенденции

Üretken Yapay Zeka: Gelişim, Zorluklar ve Gelecekteki Eğilimler Hakkında Uzman Görüşleri

AI sáng tạo: Thông tin chuyên sâu của chuyên gia về sự tiến hóa, thách thức và xu hướng tương lai

生成式人工智能：专家对演进、挑战和未来趋势的见解

I have 9 years of experience as a venture investor, and I can confirm that one of the most important things in a startup’s early stages is the team. Therefore, whether or not I decide to invest in a project largely depends on my meeting with its founder. In addition to convincing me with figures, he/she needs to build trust. While I might feel ready to invest after the first meeting, I often take some weeks to reflect. These are the qualities that influenced my decision. Industry Knowledge and Experience As a founder, you must know the ins and outs of any industry you want to venture into. For example, a fintech entrepreneur with prior experience in the banking sector will offer invaluable expertise. This is a quality I appraise, as it means you have a firsthand understanding of the industry's pain points and nuances. As an investor, I also consider the educational background of the founder. I inquire about their academic achievements, including grades and thesis topics. A solid educational foundation adds credibility to the founder's qualifications. Entrepreneurial Background Entrepreneurship is a rare talent; from my experience, only about 2% of individuals inherently possess it. In most cases, experience is the best teacher. Therefore, I value founders who have gained experience in large corporations before embarking on their own ventures. Additionally, I have greater confidence in founders who have undergone 1-2 unsuccessful projects. In my view, success alone doesn't provide valuable lessons; it's the mistakes and setbacks that offer profound learning opportunities. It's crucial that a founder evaluates these experiences and learns from them. Willingness to Admit Mistakes and Accept Change Periodically, I meet founders who don’t take criticism well. They find it difficult to admit mistakes and often accept a single hypothesis as the truth. But to make an idea work, you need to test 5-10 hypotheses, adapt the model, and possibly make a pivot. Instead, they're stuck on one idea and keep forcing it; even if it's not improving. Beyond the product itself, there are external factors necessary for growth. Hiring the right team, building a marketing strategy, finding enablers, and so on. Experienced investors with foresight can discover potential pitfalls and highlight blind spots, but not every founder is an open listener. As much as I value entrepreneurial experience and industry expertise, founders need to remain flexible so that their experience helps, and not hinders, the startup's growth. Honesty I value honesty right from early communication with the founder. My confidence in a project grows when founders openly discuss challenges, setbacks, and whatever isn’t working. Sometimes, initial hypotheses don't pan out, but determined founders continue to explore and iterate. Other times, customer acquisition costs may be prohibitively high, prompting them to experiment with new acquisition or investment channels. Being candid about what's not working demonstrates integrity, resilience, and a commitment to finding solutions. On the other hand, if founders withhold information about their challenges, it diminishes my confidence in the project. As long as I believe in the vision, I’m always open to offering solutions where possible. Passion Building a startup often spans a decade-long journey. Passion is needed to drive the commitment to see this long path through. Therefore, I look at how passionate a founder is about his/her project, and how deeply immersed they are in the topic. I also prioritize understanding a founder's commitment level and endgame aspirations — whether they are ready to dedicate themselves fully to the project, aiming for a profitable exit, or seeking to establish a lasting legacy for future generations. For instance, one founder candidly expressed a desire to exit the startup within 3-5 years. In response, I adjusted my expectations accordingly and focused on realistic growth targets rather than aiming for astronomical returns. Conclusion Successful tech entrepreneurs have a fine blend of unique skills, industry expertise, and unwavering passion. In my view, to achieve success, a founder must be 120% committed to their startup, whether it’s for the short or long term. They must also be adaptable and not overlook potential challenges. A final word to the upcoming innovators and industry disruptors: When engaging with investors, demonstrate your expertise and unwavering motivation. To build trust, be transparent in your dealings and forthright about the obstacles you face. Substantiate your claims with solid data to crown your efforts. Adopting this approach will significantly enhance your prospects of securing funding. I have 9 years of experience as a venture investor, and I can confirm that one of the most important things in a startup’s early stages is the team. Therefore, whether or not I decide to invest in a project largely depends on my meeting with its founder. In addition to convincing me with figures, he/she needs to build trust. While I might feel ready to invest after the first meeting, I often take some weeks to reflect. These are the qualities that influenced my decision. Industry Knowledge and Experience Industry Knowledge and Experience As a founder, you must know the ins and outs of any industry you want to venture into. For example, a fintech entrepreneur with prior experience in the banking sector will offer invaluable expertise. This is a quality I appraise, as it means you have a firsthand understanding of the industry's pain points and nuances. As an investor, I also consider the educational background of the founder. I inquire about their academic achievements, including grades and thesis topics. A solid educational foundation adds credibility to the founder's qualifications. Entrepreneurial Background Entrepreneurial Background Entrepreneurship is a rare talent; from my experience, only about 2% of individuals inherently possess it. In most cases, experience is the best teacher. Therefore, I value founders who have gained experience in large corporations before embarking on their own ventures. Additionally, I have greater confidence in founders who have undergone 1-2 unsuccessful projects. In my view, success alone doesn't provide valuable lessons; it's the mistakes and setbacks that offer profound learning opportunities. It's crucial that a founder evaluates these experiences and learns from them. Willingness to Admit Mistakes and Accept Change Willingness to Admit Mistakes and Accept Change Periodically, I meet founders who don’t take criticism well. They find it difficult to admit mistakes and often accept a single hypothesis as the truth. But to make an idea work, you need to test 5-10 hypotheses, adapt the model, and possibly make a pivot. Instead, they're stuck on one idea and keep forcing it; even if it's not improving. Beyond the product itself, there are external factors necessary for growth. Hiring the right team, building a marketing strategy, finding enablers, and so on. Experienced investors with foresight can discover potential pitfalls and highlight blind spots, but not every founder is an open listener. As much as I value entrepreneurial experience and industry expertise, founders need to remain flexible so that their experience helps, and not hinders, the startup's growth. Honesty Honesty I value honesty right from early communication with the founder. My confidence in a project grows when founders openly discuss challenges, setbacks, and whatever isn’t working. Sometimes, initial hypotheses don't pan out, but determined founders continue to explore and iterate. Other times, customer acquisition costs may be prohibitively high, prompting them to experiment with new acquisition or investment channels. Being candid about what's not working demonstrates integrity, resilience, and a commitment to finding solutions. On the other hand, if founders withhold information about their challenges, it diminishes my confidence in the project. As long as I believe in the vision, I’m always open to offering solutions where possible. Passion Passion Building a startup often spans a decade-long journey. Passion is needed to drive the commitment to see this long path through. Therefore, I look at how passionate a founder is about his/her project, and how deeply immersed they are in the topic. I also prioritize understanding a founder's commitment level and endgame aspirations — whether they are ready to dedicate themselves fully to the project, aiming for a profitable exit, or seeking to establish a lasting legacy for future generations. For instance, one founder candidly expressed a desire to exit the startup within 3-5 years. In response, I adjusted my expectations accordingly and focused on realistic growth targets rather than aiming for astronomical returns. Conclusion Conclusion Successful tech entrepreneurs have a fine blend of unique skills, industry expertise, and unwavering passion. In my view, to achieve success, a founder must be 120% committed to their startup, whether it’s for the short or long term. They must also be adaptable and not overlook potential challenges. A final word to the upcoming innovators and industry disruptors: A final word to the upcoming innovators and industry disruptors: When engaging with investors, demonstrate your expertise and unwavering motivation. To build trust, be transparent in your dealings and forthright about the obstacles you face. Substantiate your claims with solid data to crown your efforts. Adopting this approach will significantly enhance your prospects of securing funding.

Which Founders Do Investors Trust? Insights From a Business Angel Who Invested in 52 Startups

EthCC 2024: Impressions and Insights about the Biggest European Blockchain Conference

EthCC 2024: বৃহত্তম ইউরোপীয় ব্লকচেইন সম্মেলন সম্পর্কে ইমপ্রেশন এবং অন্তর্দৃষ্টি

EthCC 2024: Eindrücke und Einblicke zur größten europäischen Blockchain-Konferenz

EthCC 2024: Impresiones y conocimientos sobre la mayor conferencia europea sobre blockchain

EthCC 2024 : impressions et aperçus de la plus grande conférence européenne sur la blockchain

EthCC 2024: सबसे बड़े यूरोपीय ब्लॉकचेन सम्मेलन के बारे में इंप्रेशन और अंतर्दृष्टि

EthCC 2024: ヨーロッパ最大のブロックチェーンカンファレンスについての印象と考察

EthCC 2024: 유럽 최대 블록체인 컨퍼런스에 대한 인상과 통찰

EthCC 2024: Impressões e Insights sobre a Maior Conferência Europeia de Blockchain

EthCC 2024: впечатления и идеи о крупнейшей европейской конференции по блокчейну

EthCC 2024: Avrupa'nın En Büyük Blockchain Konferansı Hakkında İzlenimler ve İçgörüler

EthCC 2024: Những ấn tượng và hiểu biết sâu sắc về Hội nghị Blockchain lớn nhất châu Âu

EthCC 2024：欧洲最大的区块链会议印象与见解

Authors:
(1) Ying Tang, Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ, USA (tang@rowan.edu);
(2) Ryan Hare, Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ, USA (harer6@rowan.edu). Table of Links Abstract and I. Introduction II. Overview of PING System and Gridlock III. Design Insights and Educational Impact IV. Conclusion and References III. DESIGN INSIGHTS AND EDUCATIONAL IMPACT A. Design Insights and Student Feedback When discussing design changes made in the game with regards to student feedback, the iterations focused on three main areas: Interface design, student testing, and tutorials/student assistance. 1) Interface Design For interface design, we had a few main considerations. First, the target audience for the game is highly generalized, and thus includes players who are and are not familiar with virtual games. For players who are familiar with virtual games, certain aspects such as a standard control scheme and familiar interface elements are enough for players to understand the goals, controls, and objective of the game. For example, the updated game features a system of objective markers shown in Figure 4, where students receive a visual indication of their current objective. Even among students who were less familiar with virtual games, a visual indicator marking their objective helps to significantly improve their ability to navigate the virtual environment. Outside of marking objectives, it was also very important to have both a stated objective and a guide on the control scheme of the game. For Gridlock, students can open up a “how to play” screen at any time that indicates the control scheme of the game. Additionally, students can also access a “current objectives” screen that has a written statement of their current objective. Among players experienced with virtual games, these features were largely ignored. However, their inclusion is crucial to help players who are unfamiliar with navigating virtual game environments. One final aspect that also helped students navigate the environment was “notification” markers on certain in-game utilities. For example, when students start the game, they have a notification on one of the menu options. This incentivizes them to click this option, thus taking them to the assistance menu, as shown in Figure 5. This way, students are already familiarized with this menu before it becomes relevant, allowing them to have a smoother experience in the latter parts of the game. 2) Student Testing Another modification that was well-received among students was the replacement of some testing methods with interactive mini-games or puzzles. In each of these basic games, students receive an instructional prompt before participating. These games are designed in such a way that we can gather data on the students’ knowledge while they play. For example, as shown in Figure 6, students are tested on their ability to convert binary numbers through a game where they are tasked with matching binary numbers to their decimal counterparts as quickly as possible. 3) Student Assistance Finally, the in-game tutorials were also modified as per student feedback. In prior iterations, accessing the personalized assistance provided to students was required for students to progress. Furthermore, the assistance was specifically tailored to a student’s issues. In the updated version of the game, the assistance is general-purpose, but students are directed to a specific area that addresses their issues. This way, students have the option to manually explore additional help materials. Additionally, students now must manually access the help materials, which prevents the help prompts from breaking the flow of the game. If a student is performing poorly, the game can also put a notification marker on the help menu to encourage the student to request help. With all these changes, students have much more freedom to either accept the help as given, explore additional content at their own pace, or to ignore the help entirely and attempt to solve problems on their own. This gives students guidance if they need it, and the freedom to explore and solve problems without being limited or interrupted by the system. B. Educational Impact Preliminary results for an evaluation of educational efficacy use a pre-test and a post-test administered before and after students played the game, respectively. These tests asked students to design a state machine for a vending machine; a task which has a similar required skill set as the traffic light problem in the game. Figure 7 shows a comparison of score improvement among students from our pre-test to the post-test. Students were graded on both assignments on a scale from 0 to 1, and the graph compares four scenarios: 1) The updated game with PING system integration, modified based on student feedback as per the design statements outlined in this paper (𝑁 = 13); 2) The prior version of the game with PING system integration (𝑁 = 20); 3) An old version of Gridlock that did not use the PING system (𝑁 = 14); and 4) Students who did not play the game (𝑁 = 8). As shown, students who played the updated game had greater improvement over students who played the prior version of the game. Additionally, there were a fewer number of students who regressed or showed little improvement compared to past classroom evaluations. This is likely due to the new quality of life features and easier-to-access help documentation making it both easier and less frustrating for students to learn with Gridlock. This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY 4.0 DEED license. Authors: (1) Ying Tang, Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ, USA (tang@rowan.edu); (2) Ryan Hare, Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ, USA (harer6@rowan.edu). Authors: Authors: (1) Ying Tang, Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ, USA (tang@rowan.edu); Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rowan University, (2) Ryan Hare, Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ, USA (harer6@rowan.edu). Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rowan University, Table of Links Abstract and I. Introduction Abstract and I. Introduction II. Overview of PING System and Gridlock II. Overview of PING System and Gridlock III. Design Insights and Educational Impact III. Design Insights and Educational Impact IV. Conclusion and References IV. Conclusion and References III. DESIGN INSIGHTS AND EDUCATIONAL IMPACT A. Design Insights and Student Feedback A. Design Insights and Student Feedback When discussing design changes made in the game with regards to student feedback, the iterations focused on three main areas: Interface design, student testing, and tutorials/student assistance. 1) Interface Design 1) Interface Design For interface design, we had a few main considerations. First, the target audience for the game is highly generalized, and thus includes players who are and are not familiar with virtual games. For players who are familiar with virtual games, certain aspects such as a standard control scheme and familiar interface elements are enough for players to understand the goals, controls, and objective of the game. For example, the updated game features a system of objective markers shown in Figure 4, where students receive a visual indication of their current objective. Even among students who were less familiar with virtual games, a visual indicator marking their objective helps to significantly improve their ability to navigate the virtual environment. Outside of marking objectives, it was also very important to have both a stated objective and a guide on the control scheme of the game. For Gridlock, students can open up a “how to play” screen at any time that indicates the control scheme of the game. Additionally, students can also access a “current objectives” screen that has a written statement of their current objective. Among players experienced with virtual games, these features were largely ignored. However, their inclusion is crucial to help players who are unfamiliar with navigating virtual game environments. One final aspect that also helped students navigate the environment was “notification” markers on certain in-game utilities. For example, when students start the game, they have a notification on one of the menu options. This incentivizes them to click this option, thus taking them to the assistance menu, as shown in Figure 5. This way, students are already familiarized with this menu before it becomes relevant, allowing them to have a smoother experience in the latter parts of the game. 2) Student Testing 2) Student Testing Another modification that was well-received among students was the replacement of some testing methods with interactive mini-games or puzzles. In each of these basic games, students receive an instructional prompt before participating. These games are designed in such a way that we can gather data on the students’ knowledge while they play. For example, as shown in Figure 6, students are tested on their ability to convert binary numbers through a game where they are tasked with matching binary numbers to their decimal counterparts as quickly as possible. 3) Student Assistance 3) Student Assistance Finally, the in-game tutorials were also modified as per student feedback. In prior iterations, accessing the personalized assistance provided to students was required for students to progress. Furthermore, the assistance was specifically tailored to a student’s issues. In the updated version of the game, the assistance is general-purpose, but students are directed to a specific area that addresses their issues. This way, students have the option to manually explore additional help materials. Additionally, students now must manually access the help materials, which prevents the help prompts from breaking the flow of the game. If a student is performing poorly, the game can also put a notification marker on the help menu to encourage the student to request help. With all these changes, students have much more freedom to either accept the help as given, explore additional content at their own pace, or to ignore the help entirely and attempt to solve problems on their own. This gives students guidance if they need it, and the freedom to explore and solve problems without being limited or interrupted by the system. B. Educational Impact B. Educational Impact Preliminary results for an evaluation of educational efficacy use a pre-test and a post-test administered before and after students played the game, respectively. These tests asked students to design a state machine for a vending machine; a task which has a similar required skill set as the traffic light problem in the game. Figure 7 shows a comparison of score improvement among students from our pre-test to the post-test. Students were graded on both assignments on a scale from 0 to 1, and the graph compares four scenarios: 1) The updated game with PING system integration, modified based on student feedback as per the design statements outlined in this paper (𝑁 = 13); 2) The prior version of the game with PING system integration (𝑁 = 20); 3) An old version of Gridlock that did not use the PING system (𝑁 = 14); and 4) Students who did not play the game (𝑁 = 8). As shown, students who played the updated game had greater improvement over students who played the prior version of the game. Additionally, there were a fewer number of students who regressed or showed little improvement compared to past classroom evaluations. This is likely due to the new quality of life features and easier-to-access help documentation making it both easier and less frustrating for students to learn with Gridlock. This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY 4.0 DEED license. This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY 4.0 DEED license. available on arxiv

Enhancing Learning with Gamified Instruction: Design Insights and Educational Impact

Unlocking the Power of Crypto APIs: Transforming Data Into Insight and Opportunity

ক্রিপ্টো API-এর শক্তি আনলক করা: তথ্যকে অন্তর্দৃষ্টি এবং সুযোগে রূপান্তর করা

Die Leistungsfähigkeit von Krypto-APIs freisetzen: Daten in Erkenntnisse und Chancen umwandeln

Liberando el poder de las cripto API: transformando los datos en conocimientos y oportunidades

Libérer la puissance des API cryptographiques : transformer les données en informations et en opportunités

क्रिप्टो एपीआई की शक्ति को अनलॉक करना: डेटा को अंतर्दृष्टि और अवसर में बदलना

暗号 API のパワーを解き放つ: データを洞察と機会に変える

암호화 API의 힘 활용: 데이터를 통찰력과 기회로 전환

Desbloqueando o poder das APIs criptográficas: transformando dados em insights e oportunidades

Раскрытие возможностей криптографических API: преобразование данных в понимание и возможности

Kripto API'lerinin Gücünün Kilidini Açmak: Verileri İçgörüye ve Fırsata Dönüştürmek

Khai phá sức mạnh của API tiền điện tử: Chuyển đổi dữ liệu thành thông tin chuyên sâu và cơ hội

释放加密 API 的力量：将数据转化为洞察力和机遇

**DUBAI, UAE, July 15th, 2024/CyberNewsWire/--**On May 31, 2024, as a result of the hacking 4502.9 BTC(worth approximately $308M)were stolen from the Japanese exchange Bitcoin.DMM.com. The cybersecurity agency Match Systems conducted the current situation of the case. Japanese cryptocurrency exchange DMM Bitcoin was recently hacked, resulting in the theft of over $300 million dollars in Bitcoins. The hackers were able to access a private key, which allowed them to transfer 4,502.9 bitcoins from the exchange's main wallet. The incident occurred on May 30, 2024, and DMM Bitcoin announced the hack the following day. The reasons for the hack of the exchange are still unclear. The attack could have occurred as a result of compromised private keys. The keys of a hot wallet connected to the Internet could have been compromised either through an internal threat or an external hack, which could have allowed hackers to initiate a transfer of funds. Whether social engineering techniques or malware were used to get exchange employees to sign a transaction authorizing the transfer of funds to their wallets, we have yet to learn. An insider attack scenario cannot be ruled out, in which someone with legitimate access to the system contributed to the hack by giving the hackers the necessary data or initiating the attack. The investigation revealed that the hackers used cryptocurrency mixer JoinMarket to launder the stolen funds. More than 2,000 BTC was sent to addresses associated with JoinMarket, while the remaining 2,500 BTC remained at the hackers' original addresses. The Match Systems team was able to identify the first large withdrawal from the mixer in the amount of 223.38 BTC, as well as more than 50 withdrawals over 10 BTC that may be relevant to this case. The full cycle of money laundering can take months to a year, and Match Systems will continue to monitor the movement of stolen funds, as well as looking into the cause of the attack. About Match Systems Match Systems, is a leading company specializing in AML services, blockchain investigations, and implementation of compliance procedures for cryptocurrency projects around the world. By leveraging advanced technology and expertise in financial crime detection, the company is poised to help organizations to navigate the complex regulatory landscape as well as minimize the risks associated with digital currencies. Contact Joseph Match Systems mediacoverage@matchsystems.com This story was distributed as a release by Cyberwire under HackerNoon’s Business Blogging Program. Learn more about the program here. **DUBAI, UAE, July 15th, 2024/CyberNewsWire/--**On May 31, 2024, as a result of the hacking 4502.9 BTC(worth approximately $308M)were stolen from the Japanese exchange Bitcoin.DMM.com. The cybersecurity agency Match Systems conducted the current situation of the case. Japanese cryptocurrency exchange DMM Bitcoin was recently hacked, resulting in the theft of over $300 million dollars in Bitcoins. The hackers were able to access a private key, which allowed them to transfer 4,502.9 bitcoins from the exchange's main wallet. The incident occurred on May 30, 2024, and DMM Bitcoin announced the hack the following day. The reasons for the hack of the exchange are still unclear. The attack could have occurred as a result of compromised private keys. The keys of a hot wallet connected to the Internet could have been compromised either through an internal threat or an external hack, which could have allowed hackers to initiate a transfer of funds. Whether social engineering techniques or malware were used to get exchange employees to sign a transaction authorizing the transfer of funds to their wallets, we have yet to learn. An insider attack scenario cannot be ruled out, in which someone with legitimate access to the system contributed to the hack by giving the hackers the necessary data or initiating the attack. The investigation revealed that the hackers used cryptocurrency mixer JoinMarket to launder the stolen funds. More than 2,000 BTC was sent to addresses associated with JoinMarket, while the remaining 2,500 BTC remained at the hackers' original addresses. The Match Systems team was able to identify the first large withdrawal from the mixer in the amount of 223.38 BTC, as well as more than 50 withdrawals over 10 BTC that may be relevant to this case. The full cycle of money laundering can take months to a year, and Match Systems will continue to monitor the movement of stolen funds, as well as looking into the cause of the attack. About Match Systems Match Systems , is a leading company specializing in AML services, blockchain investigations, and implementation of compliance procedures for cryptocurrency projects around the world. By leveraging advanced technology and expertise in financial crime detection, the company is poised to help organizations to navigate the complex regulatory landscape as well as minimize the risks associated with digital currencies. Match Systems Match Systems Contact Joseph Match Systems mediacoverage@matchsystems.com This story was distributed as a release by Cyberwire under HackerNoon’s Business Blogging Program. Learn more about the program here. This story was distributed as a release by Cyberwire under HackerNoon’s Business Blogging Program. Learn more about the program here . here here

Match Systems' CEO Andrei Kutin Provides Insight On DMM Bitcoin Breach

Transforming Mobile Maps with Jetpack Compose: Insights from Google I/O for Developers

জেটপ্যাক কম্পোজের সাহায্যে মোবাইল মানচিত্র রূপান্তর: বিকাশকারীদের জন্য Google I/O থেকে অন্তর্দৃষ্টি

Mobile Karten mit Jetpack Compose transformieren: Erkenntnisse von Google I/O für Entwickler

Transformando mapas móviles con Jetpack Compose: información de Google I/O para desarrolladores

Transformer les cartes mobiles avec Jetpack Compose : informations de Google I/O pour les développeurs

जेटपैक कंपोज के साथ मोबाइल मैप्स को बदलना: डेवलपर्स के लिए Google I/O से जानकारी

Jetpack Compose でモバイル マップを変革: 開発者向け Google I/O からの洞察

Jetpack Compose로 모바일 지도 혁신: 개발자를 위한 Google I/O의 유용한 정보

Transformando mapas móveis com Jetpack Compose: insights do Google I/O para desenvolvedores

Преобразование мобильных карт с помощью Jetpack Compose: выводы Google I/O для разработчиков

Jetpack Compose ile Mobil Haritaları Dönüştürme: Geliştiriciler için Google I/O'dan Analizler

Chuyển đổi bản đồ di động bằng Jetpack Compose: Thông tin chi tiết từ Google I/O dành cho nhà phát triển

使用 Jetpack Compose 改造移动地图：Google I/O 开发者大会上的见解

Cybersecurity and AI: Meetings and Insights from the Nexus 2050 Conference

INSIGHTHX

insighthx.com

-- employees

Since n.d.

COMPANY RANKING

INSIGHTHX

EVERGREEN INDEX #6191

Representing this company? Click here to claim and customize this page!

InsightHx WIKI

Apply to get your Tech Company News Page live on HackerNoon.com today!

INSIGHTHX

insighthx.com

-- employees

Since n.d.

COMPANY RANKING

INSIGHTHX

EVERGREEN INDEX #6191

RELATED COMPANIESRANK

STORIES ABOUT INSIGHTHX

Representing this company? Click here to claim and customize this page!

InsightHx WIKI

Apply to get your Tech Company News Page live on HackerNoon.com today!