We believe the future of finance will be built on open protocols, decentralized infrastructure, and rapid innovation

Barracuda Networks

Phishing scammers – the bottom feeders of the digital world, the parasites that slither through the vast expanse of the internet, preying on unsuspecting individuals like a virus targeting a weakened host. These digital flea bags think they have mastered the art of deception, employing tactics that would make even the most cunning con artists of yesteryear hang their heads in shame. Let's talk about these insidious creatures who, instead of contributing positively to the online realm, choose to exploit the vulnerabilities of others. The audacity they display is nothing short of infuriating. They concoct elaborate schemes, sending emails that seem like harmless messages from reputable sources – banks, email providers, or hosting services. They play on our trust, using psychological manipulation to trick us into revealing the keys to our virtual kingdoms. Picture this: you innocently check your email, only to find a message that appears to be from your trusted email provider, warning you of suspicious activity. Panic sets in as they claim someone is trying to access your account, and the only way to secure it is by clicking on a link conveniently provided in the email. Little do you know that you're about to step into the web of deception woven by these low-life leeches. Click that link, and you're transported to a meticulously crafted imitation of your email or hosting provider's login page. It's a digital mirage, a wolf in sheep's clothing. The page looks so authentic that you'd swear you've landed on the real deal. Oblivious to the impending danger, you proceed to enter your sacred login credentials, unknowingly handing over the keys to your virtual kingdom to these faceless miscreants. The Drive Behind Digital Parasites What drives these bottom-feeding digital parasites to engage in such nefarious activities? It's a question that boggles the mind. In a world bursting with opportunities to earn a legitimate living online, these scammers opt for the path of deception, showcasing the minuscule size of their moral compass. Instead of contributing to the vast sea of innovation and progress, they choose to ride the coattails of others, siphoning off hard-earned information with no regard for the havoc they wreak on unsuspecting victims. So, Where Do Phishing Emails Most Commonly Come From? The infuriating truth about scam emails has been laid bare by a study from Barracuda Networks, revealing that the dubious honor of being the primary source of these digital nuisances goes to Eastern European countries. Two billion emails were scrutinized in this research, and the disheartening discovery is that the top five countries unleashing phishing attacks with reckless abandon are Lithuania, Latvia, Serbia, Ukraine, and Russia – all proudly representing Eastern Europe. In a descending cascade of cyber mischief, the next culprits hail from the Americas and Asia: the Bahamas, Puerto Rico, Colombia, Iran, Palestine, and Kazakhstan. While the sheer volume of phishing emails pouring out of certain nations is staggering, the report reminds us that the devil is in the percentage details. For instance, the United States, a prolific sender of 129,369 phishing emails, barely scrapes 0.02% of the overall email torrent. Most countries, according to the report, have a phishing probability of 10% or less, making it a relatively tiny villain in the global email landscape. Adding insult to injury, Barracuda also sheds light on the globetrotting nature of these fraudulent missives. Phishing emails, it turns out, prefer a multi-country itinerary, with 80% of them making pitstops in two or fewer countries, compared to a meager 60% for their benign counterparts. In a twist of irony, major players in the tech realm – Amazon, Microsoft, and Twitter – find themselves unwitting accomplices in this nefarious game, unwittingly hosting the highest volumes of phishing emails leveraging their infrastructure. Chris Ross, the Senior Vice President of International Operations at Barracuda Networks, voiced his exasperation, suggesting that while outright blacklisting entire nations might seem absurd, the research could serve as a wake-up call for IT managers and CISOs. He proposed deploying AI-based email security to sift through the digital chaos, flagging anomalies and detecting threats that slip through the cracks of basic email protection. Ross also championed the cause of improving security awareness through training, hoping to fortify organizations against the relentless onslaught of cyber threats in the long run. One can't help but marvel at the irony. In an era where countless avenues exist for legitimate online endeavors – from freelancing and e-commerce to cryptocurrency investments and digital entrepreneurship – these digital fleas decide to devote their time and energy to constructing elaborate ruses. It's as if their cognitive capacities are so limited that they can't fathom the prospect of contributing positively to the digital landscape! The worst part is that, as technology advances, so do the tactics of these online vultures. They adapt, evolve, and refine their methods, making it increasingly challenging to discern between a legitimate email and a cunning phishing attempt. Who do they think they are, invading my sacred email space with their bogus urgency? "Click on this link," they say, "or face the impending doom of your inbox suspension." Oh, please! As if I'm going to fall for that blatant attempt to scare me into submission. Do they really believe I'll be trembling in my virtual boots, desperately clicking away to save my precious inbox? And let's not even get started on the audacity of crafting a webpage that's a carbon copy of my cPanel login. I mean, how dare they mimic the very interface I trust to manage my hosting! It's like a virtual Trojan horse, sneaking into my cyber citadel under the guise of urgency and authenticity. These parasites must think they're so clever, playing mind games with innocent email recipients like me. But here's the thing – I'm not biting. I'm not falling for their phishing expedition. Do they really think I'll just mindlessly surrender my login credentials, like I'm handing out candy on Halloween? News flash, scammers: I'm not your average digital dunce. I've got my wits about me, and I'm not about to let you infiltrate my fortress of security. It's a never-ending game of cat and mouse, and unfortunately, it's the unsuspecting users who find themselves ensnared in the web of deceit. So here's to the parasites of the digital realm, the phishing scammers who thrive on the misery of others. May their schemes be exposed, their digital lairs dismantled, and may they one day realize the futility of their actions. Nice try, but no cigar you goose! I'm not your prey, and my inbox is not your playground. Take your deceitful links elsewhere because this user is not taking the bait! You see, you're up against someone who has fortified their cyber defenses to the max. Do you really think that after all the blood, sweat, and tears I've poured into securing my digital kingdom, I'm going to let you waltz in with your amateur phishing attempts? Think again. Even if, by some stretch of your feeble imagination, I were to entertain the idea of entering my password into your dodgy imitation cPanel login, good luck getting past my two-factor authentication. It's like trying to pick a lock with a spaghetti noodle – not happening. I've got an extra layer of security standing guard, and it's not interested in your cheap tricks. Oh, and did I mention my local and cloud firewalls? Yeah, those are like the impenetrable walls of my cyber fortress, standing tall and strong. You're not breaching that defense. It's like trying to storm the gates of Helm's Deep with a water pistol – futile and laughable. And let's not forget about , my digital bouncer that ensures only the authorized VIPs get past the velvet rope. You think you can just stroll in and cause havoc? Think again. Cloudflare has locked down my login access to a single IP, and you, my friend, are not on the guest list. Cloudflare Even when I send emails, I've got my tracks covered. The sending IP is hidden, wrapped up tighter than a birthday present. You won't find a trace because I've taken the necessary precautions to make sure my digital footprint is as elusive as a ninja in the night. My Personal Message To All Phishing Scammers Alright, listen up, you despicable bottom-feeders, you phishing scam artists. I've got a bone to pick with you, and trust me, it's not going to be a pleasant conversation. You, with your deceitful tactics and predatory schemes, preying on unsuspecting individuals like vultures circling a wounded animal. First and foremost, let's talk about your lack of morals. What kind of person wakes up in the morning and thinks, "You know what sounds like a great idea? Ruining someone else's life for my personal gain!" Your twisted sense of ethics is not only appalling but also a testament to the sorry state of humanity. How do you sleep at night, knowing that you've contributed absolutely nothing positive to the world? And let's not forget your so-called "skills." Oh, bravo, you can send out mass emails, create fake websites, and mimic legitimate organizations. Give yourself a pat on the back for being a tech-savvy leech on society. But let me make something clear – your so-called talent doesn't make you clever or sophisticated; it just makes you a cowardly weasel hiding behind a computer screen. Now, let's talk about the damage you cause. You not only steal people's hard-earned money but also their trust and sense of security. You exploit vulnerabilities, leaving victims in financial ruin and emotional distress. How does it feel to be the cause of someone's sleepless nights, anxiety attacks, and shattered sense of trust in the online world? But here's the thing, despite your pathetic attempts to hide behind the anonymity of the internet, you are not invincible. The long arm of justice is relentless, and as technology advances, so does the ability to track down and prosecute scumbags like you. It's only a matter of time before you're caught in the web you've woven. Dear Phishing scammers, you are the lowest of the low. Your actions are not just criminal; they are a blight on the digital landscape. The internet should be a space for progress, connectivity, and positive change, not a breeding ground for parasites like you. So, do us all a favor – find a more productive use of your time, preferably one that doesn't involve ruining the lives of innocent people. So, to you, Mr. Worthless Waste of Space, and all your phishing accomplices, good luck trying to crack this nut. You've chosen the wrong target, and my cyber defenses are like an impenetrable shield against your feeble attempts. In a world brimming with opportunities, these phishing toss pots choose the path of deception, revealing the true extent of their intellectual shortcomings. In the grand tapestry of the internet, let them be nothing more than a footnote – a cautionary tale for those who dare to navigate the virtual waters.

Phishing Scammers – The Bottom Feeders Of The Digital World

Introduction Who are all those people on social media? Those people who randomly like, share, comment on posts, harass and praise other people and events. The anonymous users who influence public opinion, dictate the social discourse, and even have the power to decide the outcome of elections. They could have Ph.D.’s or be children. Or their personas could be entirely fabricated by AI. It can be concluded that they are unidentifiable. Here is a spooky thought experiment for you. Imagine that you are texting back and forth with someone or reading an article online. Naturally, you’d assume that there is a human, made of flesh and bones at the other end. In actuality, however, the communication or content you receive is solely generated by an AI. Just like the fake profile photo. How could you know? To take the thought experiment one step further: How can you prove that friends you have in your network on social media are really who they appear to be? When you meet them, their faces serve as proof of identity. But in the online space, there is hardly any direct way for users to verify if a profile is in fact linked to the person it represents. Even Instagram stories, TikTok videos, or the most heartfelt Facebook postings can in theory be deepfaked. Essentially, information online cannot be trusted. Sure, right now this dilemma is more philosophical than pragmatic. However, technologies that can distort reality in online spaces are getting stronger by the day. Just imagine what they can do in 10 or 50 years. Without a bulletproof method for users to confirm people’s identity, the internet may run into a situation that resonates with “dead internet theory” — an underground, conspiracy theory that proposes the internet is “fake”, basically a gaslighting project that is almost entirely controlled by AI. [1] Bizarre as it sounds, I do believe there is a disturbing ring of truth to it. In this post, I will go over what the dead internet theory is, and how a platform-agnostic identify system built on the “trustless” web 3.0 could resolve the current problem of digital identities. Dead Internet Theory — Main Premise “Dead internet theory” had a breakthrough into mainstream media when a on the forum caught the attention of The Atlantic writer Kaitlynn Tiffany. widely read post Agora Road Macintosh Cafe The post was written by a forum member called “IlluminatiPirate” who boasts about being an “ ” (meaning an old-time member) of imageboards such as 4chan who has “ ”. In the midst of his seemingly paranoid ramblings, there are some nuggets of truth that many people can relate to. oldfag seen it all The pseudonymous forum member compiled evidence to the theory which was according to him originally written by anonymous users on 4chan’s paranormal section and Wizchan. The latter is an imageboard dedicated to male virgins past the age of 30 or “wizards” as they are called in the community. As The Atlantic writer Kaitlyn Tiffany aptly wrote, dead internet is “ ”, yet it “ ”. patently ridiculous feels true [2] The TLDR-version (meaning the abstract) of the theory is perhaps a testament to that: [3] “Large proportions of the supposedly human-produced content on the internet are actually generated by artificial intelligence networks in conjunction with paid secret media influencers in order to manufacture consumers for an increasing range of newly-normalised cultural products.” Or when IlluminatPirate describes a strange hunch he has that something is very wrong about the internet: [4] “The Internet feels empty and devoid of people. It is also devoid of content. Compared to the Internet of say 2007 (and beyond) the Internet of today is entirely sterile. There is nowhere to go and nothing to do, see, read or experience anymore. It all imploded into a handful of normalfag [5] sites and these empty husks we inhabit. Yes, the Internet may seem gigantic, but it’s like a hot air balloon with nothing inside.” The main premise of the theory I believe is somewhat accurate. A report shows that bots make up almost two-thirds of all internet traffic anno 2021. [6] Additionally, curate and prioritize the content it shows to users based on the principle of profit-maximization. In other words, social media algorithms and search engines push content that entices users to buy more products and services, and neglect content that is controversial. social media algorithms Additionally, the unfathomable amount of data processed on the internet every minute, kind of makes it all blend together. The human mind was never designed to take in, or even less sort out, in such quantities of information. Dead Internet Theory — Valid Points In the most proficient imageboard slang, the author goes on to describe why dead internet theory is real and why the internet isn’t. Some of his points are hard to follow, passages are incoherent, and at times he is clearly delusional. However, some of the arguments coincide with my own research and personal beliefs. IlluminatPirate points to the superficial and impersonal nature of online interactions: “I used to be in perpetual contact with a solid number of people across multiple sites. Across the years each and every one of them vanished without a trace.” He points out how the same content keeps reappearing over and over again: “I’ve seen the same threads, the same pics and the same replies reposted over and over across the years to the point of me seeing it as unremarkable.” I also share his belief that truly original content is suffering because large players in the entertainment industry rely on algorithms and big data analysis of consumer habits to “feed the customers”. That is often the feeling I have when I watch a new movie from Netflix Originals: “Algorithm fiction. Do you like capeshit, Anon? How about other Hollywood stuff? Music perhaps? Have you noticed how sterile fiction has become? How it caters to the lowest common denominator and follows the same template over and over again? How music is just autotunes and basic blandness? The writer’s strike never ended. Algorithms and computer programs are manufacturing modern fiction. No human being is behind these things. This is why anime looms so large — even a simple moe anime has heart because there’s actual people behind it, and we all intuitively feel this.” IlluminatiPirate also points to the dangers of deepfakes. As implied at the beginning of this post, the technology could potentially take off within the next couple of years: “Fake people. No, not NPC’s. Youtube people who talk about this or that, and quite possibly many politicians, actors and so forth may not actually exist.” Social media algorithms and search engines alike are known to customize news feeds and search results so it fits with the individual user’s likes and preferences. This customization feature results in so-called “ ” where users are constantly reaffirmed in their own beliefs and opinions. epistemic bubbles Everything the users see confirms what they already know, and people they interact with tend to wholeheartedly agree with them. People are thus exposed to a very one-sided view of the world. It creates a potentially dangerous “us vs. them”, “they are wrong, we are right”-dynamic in society. “The internet is a fast way to get info, and info is what moves the mind, and the thing is, the mind likes recognition. When the “likes” were introduced without negative feedback they created a copy-feedback subconscious, they made it so only “positive” opinions be propagated (also accepted), and in it’s way negative opinions to be obsolete. Now everyone is too cowardly to have an opinion so they copy others they like, they are more likely to follow trends and say what others said, you can also see it with the paranoia of always wanting to listen to experts.” Finally, I think one of the most interesting points to be drawn from the compilation post on dead internet theory, is the distinction between “the old web” and “the new web”. If cut to the bone, IlluminatiPirate’s basic point is that he misses the old days of the internet, and dreads what the internet has become. The same notion is shared even by the founder of the world wide web, Tim Bernes-Lee, who says that the system is failing. [7] “Creation of original content is how the internet used to work. Anonymous people were willing to express their opinions and try radical or experimental things. More truly original content, uninfluenced by bots or paid influencers, was created due to anonymity as protection against negative feedback. On the old internet, you could start anew every time you posted something.” There is indeed a conventionally accepted distinction between an “old” internet (web 1.0) and a new internet (web 2.0). The first version of the internet was read-only, while the second version allow us to upload our everyday lives to various platforms. The problem with web 2.0 is that four companies control 67% of the world’s cloud infrastructure. The large tech monopolies claim ownership of our data, and indeed of our digital identities. [8] [9] With all this in mind — how can we prove that the internet is not fake? Or to turn the question around: how can we make it real? Building a Trustless Internet Satoshi Nakamoto, the anonymous creator of Bitcoin, had an extraordinarily deep understanding of human nature. He understood that transactions between humans are based on trust. Within good reason, trusting others is usually considered to be a positive trait. However, human beings are fallible. Therefore, Satoshi Nakamoto founded Bitcoin, a monetary system based on cryptographic proof instead of trust. [10] The transactions and interactions we have with other people on the web should be based on Bitcoin’s principle of “trustlessness”. What we need is a reliable and transparent method to link people’s digital avatars to the people they are supposed to represent in real life. That would mitigate a wide array of issues such as fake spam accounts, the deliberate spread of false information, deceivable media manipulation, fraud, catfishing, cyberbullying, and trolling because people can be held directly accountable for their actions in the online space. Importantly, online identity systems have to be (a) open and (b) decentralized. The contemporary solution where you upload your personal ID to the service provider for verification does not fulfill either of those criteria. If the identity system is closed and centralized, the system owner would be able to track and monitor people’s behavior much like China’s social credit system. Therefore, online identity systems have to be built on the infrastructure of web 3.0. The key characteristic of web 3.0 is that users are in charge of their data and digital identity. Plenty of companies are already working towards this shift by building platform-agnostic identity solutions for the web that can be scaled. Notably, recognizes the importance of being able to prove your online identity in a secure way that helps you to keep your credentials and information private. They currently offer a decentralized, identity system called for organizations. Microsoft [11] Azure AD Verifiable Credentials Examples of other companies that work on decentralized, blockchain-based identity systems are , , , , and . ONTology XSL Labs Cheqd Sovrin Decentralized Identity Foundation When digital identity solutions such as these become widely used, authorization with username and password or with social identity via accounts on Google, Facebook, or Twitter will be ancient history. Instead, you will own a unique digital passport that can be authorized by a peer-to-peer network in the place of an intermediary every time you register for a new online service. You can also decide what pieces of data to make available, to whom, and under what conditions. For example, if an application is age-restricted, you can prove with your digital passport that you are above a certain age without providing any further information such as your birthday. Or if an agency is interested in using your consumer preferences for commercial or statistical purposes you can set a price for giving them access to your data. [12] [13] That is only fair. Everything we do online leaves a digital footprint. These digital footprints are picked up by monopolistic technology companies and used as lubrication for algorithms and AI. Although they have no rightful claim to extract our subtle pieces of information for free. If nothing changes, the dystopian vision of dead internet theory could eventually become true. The internet may become a twilight zone controlled by powerful, proprietary-owned AI that will continue to make great profits from our personalities, beliefs, and human qualities. Luckily, the explosion in blockchain innovation and the hype surrounding web 3.0 are raising awareness of the digital identity problem and the current lack of data ownership for internet users. Kaitlyn Tiffany (Aug 31, 2021), Maybe You Missed It, but the Internet “Died” Five Years Ago -> (13–02–2022). [1] https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2021/08/dead-internet-theory-wrong-but-feels-true/619937/ Kaitlyn Tiffany (2021), “Maybe You Missed It, but the Internet ‘Died’ Five Years Ago” -> . [2] https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2021/08/dead-internet-theory-wrong-but-feels-true/619937/ (18–02–2022). [3] https://forum.agoraroad.com/index.php?threads/dead-internet-theory-most-of-the-internet-is-fake.3011/ Ibid. [4] Normalfag: slang for average internet use [5] Barracuda (Sep 2021), Bot Attacks: Top Threats and Trends -> [6] https://assets.barracuda.com/assets/docs/dms/Bot_Attacks_report_vol1_EN.pdf (12–02–2021). [7] https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/nov/15/tim-berners-lee-world-wide-web-net-neutrality Emily Nicolle (12–02–2022), Andreessen’s Dixon Spies Riches in Web3. Others See ‘Rubbish’ -> . [8] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-02-12/andreessen-horowitz-a16z-s-chris-dixon-sees-web3-riches-others-see-rubbish?srnd=cryptocurrencies (12–02–2022). [9] https://uk.pcmag.com/old-cloud-infrastructure/131713/four-companies-control-67-of-the-worlds-cloud-infrastructure See (18–02–2022)- [10] https://i.redd.it/njml2ng9j7h81.png Quote from Azure Friday (16. August 2019), An introduction to [11] https://docs.microsoft.com/da-dk/shows/Azure-Friday/An-introduction-to-decentralized-identities George Zarkadakis, The Internet Is Dead: Long Live the Internet, pg. 49. From Werthner et. al Perspective on Digital Humanism (2022), Springer. [12] Ibid. [13] Co-published here.

Explore the Problem of Digital Identities and the Impending Doom of the Dead Internet 

, the innovative and secure solution alternative to traditional emails and document storage , will hold its first-ever Initial Exchange Offering (IEO) through the from SafePost (a market of more than $ 200 billion / year with more than 3.5 billion users) P2PB2B launchpad March 16th to April 19th, 2020. Token Economics, the owner of SafePost, aims to raise to accelerate the marketing strategy and the development of its product €472,000 (around $519,200) (international patent extension, KYC process, ISO certification, program software for macOS and Windows computers, digital safe…). The price will be €0.001 / STAMP ($0.0011/ STAMP). There will be 4 sessions for a total of 500,000,000 STAMPS proposed: from March 20th till Mach 1st: 1st session 10% discount from March 24th till April 1st: 2nd session 7% discount from April 2nd till April 6th: 3rd session 5% discount from April 9th till April 19th: 4th session no discount Each session will sell 125,000,000 tokens €0.001 / STAMP is the minimum guaranteed price by SafePost® for using its services. WHY SAFEPOST? SafePost was created in response to the inability of anti-SPAM, anti-virus and anti-PHISHING filters to protect us effectively. The secure email market is . Despite anti-SPAM, anti-virus and anti-PHISHING filters, worth more than $ 200 billion a year for poor results we continue to receive unsolicited and fraudulent emails, while many desired messages are mistakenly classified as "SPAM" or "JUNK EMAILS". SPAM is not just an annoying experience that makes us miss opportunities or disrupts our work. , explore the content of our hard disk and send spam messages to other victims. Phishing emails target our identity, our secrets and our money. They take control of our computer The FBI has documented 166,349 domestic and international complaints of fraudulent email victims , representing between June 2016 and July 2019 a total loss of more than $ 26.2 billion. A study published in November 2019 by the company BARRACUDA ° revealed that, 47% of attacks are from a Gmail account, This percentage triples when the email usurps the identity of the head of Human Resources or the IT department, A phishing email out of 10 manages to convince its recipient to click on the link that is proposed to him. In the last 12 months, the average amount lost as a result of a spear-phishing attack was $270,000, A recent email scam did cost $ 29 million to a media conglomerate. ( Source ) Last but not least: If you manage your emails by yourself, your email server may be hacked or stolen and hackers will read its content. a third party can access the contents of messages stored on traditional email servers. If you use a standard email service, there is a risk a third party (e.g. a competitor) presses your provider to access the contents of your messages. SafePost eliminates these problems: Each SafePost user has his address and communicates only with people he has previously identified. With SafePost, there is, therefore, no more unsolicited messages, and no more doubt about the source of messages received No risk a third party may access the content of your messages stored on SafePost No confidential data is stored in clear on SafePost servers, allowing encryption of messages and documents exchanged, without requiring the use of a trusted third party. thanks to a patented energy-efficient system developed and owned by SafePost In case of failure or theft of a SafePost server, you will keep accessing your messages while the thief cannot decrypt anything. WHY STAMP TOKENS? Minimum value guaranteed by SafePost: €0.001 / STAMP for using its services. SafePost is valorized with STAMP tokens. tokens on the P2Pb2B crypto exchange at You can buy STAMP https://p2pb2b.io/token-sale/STAMP/1 and later sell them on this same exchange. tokens by speaking about SafePost around you and on social networks. You can become a SafePost ambassador too. As a matter of sample, and you will get a bonus as an ambassador. You can earn STAMP you will receive 100 STAMP tokens every time a contact you invited joins SafePost tokens to pay services provided by SafePost. You can use STAMP Note : €14.60 for SafePost vs an average of $49 for anti-spam solutions. SafePost is cheaper than other solutions available on the market (around $16.79) The minimum value guaranteed by SafePost is €0.001 / STAMP for using its services. => the user would pay 1 STAMP to send a post. Case #1, the price of the STAMP on the exchange is under €0.001 (= €0.001: the price guaranteed by SafePost for using its services) => the user will pay 0.5 STAMP to send a post. Case #2, the price of the STAMP on the exchange is above €0.001 (e.g. €0.002) The more SafePost users there will be, the higher will be the price of the STAMP. THE SAFEPOST ROADMAP SafePost is available at . Around 40,000 users have registered since October 15th, 2019. A SafePost app for Android and Apple devices will be available on Google Play in March and in April 2020 to make the product more user-friendly. https://safepost.com On 12 December 2019, SafePost won the INNOVATION PRIZE awarded by the French Chamber of Commerce and Industry. Next steps are in May, patent extension application in June, and computers in September 2020, and in December 2020, in March 2021, in June 2021, in September 2021, secured voice conversations in March 2022. SafePost® premium accounts with KYC process SafePost program software for macOS Windows ISO 9001 (quality) 27001 (safety) certifications secured agenda secured chat Digital Safe Connect With Us | | | | | Website Launchpad White Paper Lite Paper Facebook Telegram | LinkedIN Twitter

The Future Of Email on The Blockchain Launches An IEO To Accelerate Its Development

Learning AI if You Suck at Math — P3 — Building an AI Dream Machine or Budget Friendly Special

Verizon’s 2020 DBIR reports that more than 80% of hacking-related breaches involve brute force or the use of lost or stolen credentials— here’s how to prevent weak or compromised credentials from being used in your company’s applications and network Cybercriminals are creatures of opportunity when it comes to committing cybercrimes: They look for the biggest score with the most minimal amount of effort. And when it comes to accessing users’ personal and business-related accounts, their approach isn’t much different. They look for ways to access your account with as little effort as possible by using compromised credentials. How Hackers Get Access to Users’ Accounts As of June 9, 2020, the website shows that there are 9,760,722,439 (nearly 9.8 billion) known “pwned” accounts in existence. That means that the number of compromised accounts surpasses the number of people that we have living in the entire world today! So, this means that for some people, several of their accounts’ passwords have become compromised. haveibeenpwned.com What makes this realization even worse is this: A by Carnegie Mellon University’s Security and Privacy Institute (CyLab) shows that only one-in-three users bother to change their passwords in the aftermath of a publicized data breach. And when they do bother changing their passwords, the updated passwords are frequently less secure than the compromised ones they replaced! recent study Now, let’s imagine that some of those negligent users are your own employees. What would this mean for your business? Let’s connect the dots: Data breaches occur. People don’t change their passwords. Cybercriminals often use those breached credentials. If successful, they gain access to insecure accounts using those creds. Needless to say, this spells trouble for your organization in the form of credential account compromise. But just what sorts of tactics do cybercriminals frequently use to gain access to accounts? Brute Force Attacks is both a type of attack and category of attacks that exploit insecure passwords. The goal for threat actors? To force their way into your account to gain unauthorized access to your content, assets, and information. It involves a hacker testing a list of values (typically words that can be found in a dictionary) against a server to analyze how it responds. The list can also contain various of those terms that include special characters and numbers. So, in the most basic sense, are like having a cybercriminal who’s armed with a massive key ring: They try every key in a lock until one works (eventually). Brute force brute force attacks Credential Stuffing Attacks The Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) defines as a type of brute force attack that involves “the automated injection of breached username/password pairs in order to fraudulently gain access to user accounts.” So, in a nutshell, a credential stuffing attack is a bit like firing a shotgun: The cybercriminal “fires” passwords and credential combinations that were stolen or leaked to test and see if any of the combinations are valid. credential stuffing Credential stuffing attacks are something that cybersecurity companies are continually fighting. One recent credential stuffing attack that lasted a grand total of 60 hours and involved 44 million login attempts! That’s the equivalent of 733,333 login attempts per hour or 12,222 login attempts per minute. Imperva reported mitigating Password Spraying Attacks Much like credential stuffing, is another type of brute force attack. But in this case, it uses a single password against multiple targeted user accounts before moving on to try other individual passwords. password spraying This method of attack is like the virtual equivalent of lobbing a virtual grenade made of duplicate keys into a room filled with different locks. The goal of “spraying” a single password across multiple accounts to see if the password is valid for any of them enables an attacker to more effectively test a single key across many accounts. So, with successful attacks occurring at such a rapid rate, what can you do to protect your organization against weak or compromised password attacks? 7 Tips for How to Prevent Credential Attacks Within Your Organization Let’s be perfectly frank: No matter what anyone tells you, there is no one-size-fits-all approach to stopping credential-based cyber attacks. (Or any types of cyber attacks, for that matter.) All you can do is implement a layered approach that makes you a tougher target. So with that in mind, here are 7 steps you can take to prevent compromised credentials from affecting your organization. Tip 1: Monitor Your Traffic and Access Logs Using AI and Automation Any organization that’s worth its security salt monitors and analyzes its traffic and access reports. Part of this monitoring involves reviewing successful and failed login attempts. Some organizations might employ in house resources and personnel using an SIEM approach while others may hire third-party services and solutions to do it for them. These records can show whether specific IP addresses or groups of them that are attempting to log in to users’ accounts. (This helps you to identity potential brute force attacks.) Artificial intelligence and machine learning solutions make it possible to scour the logs and identify any suspicious activity and failed login attempts in record time. An advantage of using these solutions is that it frees up your human workers so that they can focus on the analysis of the potential threats or handle other important tasks. Tip 2: Use Breached Credential Lists to your Advantage Brute force attacks the perfect solution for the lazy (or efficient, depending on how you look at it) hacker. Cybercriminals either purchase or download these lists of credentials (dictionaries) for free, and then they use automation to run through these lists of stolen or leaked credentials until they find a combination that works. But where are they getting these lists? There’s plenty of information available on the Dark Web and collaborative hacker communities and sites like GitHub. There are also people posting lists of the most commonly used passwords as well. For example, here’s a screenshot of a list of that’s available through GitHub: 10,000 of the most common passwords Image Source: GitHub Heck, how about a list of the instead? Oh, yeah, that’s available on GitHub, too (and has been for more than a year!). 100,000 (100k) most commonly used credentials While having access to these types of public lists sucks for the cybersecurity-ignorant user who uses these types of passwords, there’s a bit of silver lining for organizations: You can use these lists to prevent brute force attacks from being successful. You can do this by preventing users from using insecure or compromised passwords in the first place. One example of how to do this is to in the Microsoft Azure Active Directory. Azure’s AD already pulls from its internal global banned password list, but this custom capability allows you to specify additional terms that wouldn’t be allowed to be used as passwords. create custom lists of banned passwords Image source: Microsoft Unfortunately, their custom password list limits you to 1,000 prohibited terms. But there are additional tools and options you can consider such as . Specops Password Policy If you’re using WordPress, you also can use a plugin such as , which checks passwords against an online list of common passwords and terms in more than 20 languages. Or, you can use a tool like , which is available as an app as well as a plugin, to audit your website for known insecure credentials. Simply upload your password dictionary and let the scanner’s user enumerator and password cracking tools take care of the rest. No Weak Passwords WPScan Tip 3: Filter or Blacklist Suspicious IP Addresses During a credential stuffing or other type of credential attack, your network logs would likely show a few specific IP addresses with repeated failed login attempts across multiple accounts. This is an indication of some less sophisticated credential-based attacks. The good news? You can choose to either filter or block these IP addresses altogether. but to summarize, it’s a compilation of any IP addresses, domains, URLs that are suspicious or malicious. By applying a blacklist to virtually any area of your network, you can deny service to entities that may pose a threat to your organization. Some companies purchase blacklists from commercial services while others compile their using their logs of failed login attempts. There’s no right or wrong way to go about it. NIST has a couple of definitions for the term “blacklist,” However, if your organization lacks the resources or personnel to painstakingly go through network logs, there are publicly reported blacklists of “bad” IP addresses that you can use. If you’re not sure where to start looking for them, here’s a list of a few free and commercial resources: — The abuse IP database is a great resource that you can use to either check the veracity of a questionable IP address or to access lists of them. While they do offer subscription plans, they also do offer a free plan with access to their basic blacklist and some other useful goodies. AbuseIPDB — The Barracuda Reputation Block list (BRBL) is a free DNSBL of known spam-sending IP addresses. Barracuda Central — This list of block IPs and top attacker IP addresses is a conglomeration of data compiled by SPAMHAUS and DShield. Emerging Threats — This website is a great free tool that shows a list of the latest threats, including URLs, IP addresses, geographic location, and the type of threat each list item poses. Scumware.org — Their (XBL) and (SBL) are great resources via their Datafeed Service. SPAMHAUS exploits block list SPAMHAUS block list One important note: Some of these resources may have usage restrictions, so be sure to read the usage agreements before using any of these resources. If you’re looking for additional RBL resources, be sure to check out . Also, there are also plenty of other online tools and sites that you can use to check individual IP addresses, including your own — and . multirbl.valli.org’s list of RBLs whatismyipaddress.com dnschecker.org There are known IP address lists by region, too. So, another cool trick that you can use is to set up regional IP limitations. This is great if you’re an organization that only works with local or regional customers — for example, if you’re a U.S. company that only does business with individuals in the continental U.S., you could block IP addresses that fall outside those parameters. So, if you suddenly notice failed login attempts from IP addresses that are well outside your customers’ regions, you can block them. Of course, cybercriminals can employ various method to hide their IP addresses — such as through the use of VPNs and botnets — but IP filtering and blacklisting, at least, serves to protect you against the less sophisticated attackers. Tip 4: Use PassProtect On Your Web Apps is a tool ( ) that prevents compromised passwords from being used as user credentials. To be more specific, it’s a tool that binds itself to email and password input elements to identify any user emails or passwords that have been exposed in past data breaches. It does this by checking those values against breaches passwords and email addresses that have been identified by the Have I Been Pwned? API service. PassProtect as well as a Google Chrome extension So, if you were to integrate this into your own web apps, it could help you to mitigate the use of weak and compromised passwords by your users. Tip 5: Implement Multi Factor Authentication and Other Security Measures Here’s another way that you can from the use of weak or compromised credentials: Make the use of and other authentication mechanisms mandatory. protect your website multi-factor authentication (MFA) Multi factor authentication is a great way to supplement password security and prevent the use of stolen credentials. Basically, in addition to your password, an attacker would also require access to additional elements (such as access to a physical security token or biometric) to complete the authentication process. They couldn’t just use breached credentials alone to access accounts. (DBIR) reiterates the impact of credential theft in web app attacks. Although the following excerpt speaks specifically to the number of web app attacks targeting the construction, the sentiment extends to other verticals as well: Verizon’s 2020 Data Breach Investigations Report “For the Web Applications attacks, the most common hacking variety was the use of stolen credentials. Sometimes these were obtained from a phishing attack, and sometimes they were just part of the debris field from other breaches. Employees reusing their credentials for multiple accounts (both professional and personal) increases risk for organizations when there are breaches and the stolen credentials are then used for credential stuffing. The key to reducing this risk is to ensure that the stolen credentials are worthless against your infrastructure by implementing multifactor authentication methods.” The shares a few additional ways that you can supplement your password security measures: U.S. CERT’s Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency — Automate the disabling of systems that register inactive for a set period. If someone isn’t using an account, then there’s no reason to continue keeping it active. You can always reactivate an account as needed. Disable inactive accounts — Use “salting” and one-way “hashing” to make stored passwords more secure. Salting and hashing are processes that involve adding additional random characters to an existing password before scrambling it into an unintelligible form. Secure password data — Implementing an account lockout policy that initiates a lockout after a set number of failed login attempts helps to mitigate brute force attacks. Account lockout policies Tip 6: Set Policies and Rules Relating to Password Strength and Limitations Password policies are useful for ensuring that any passwords that are created are as secure as possible. Some such policies include: — A simple password is often an insecure password. Thankfully, you can set such as requiring users to include at least one number, uppercase letter, special character, etc. You also can specify here any special letters, numbers, or characters that they can’t use. NIST provides guidance on password security in its special publication . Microsoft also provides some that you might find useful. Password complexity policies password complexity parameters NIST SP 800-63B password guidance information — Also known as a , this particular policy ensures that users regularly change their passwords. Basically, it requires users to change their passwords after a set period of time. Conversely, there are also minimum password age policies that you can implement as well. Maximum password age policies password expiration policy — A common practice that many computer users employ is rotating through a small set of passwords that they can remember. By putting a password history policy in place, you’re mandating that each user has to cycle through before they can circle back to using a previous password. Password history policies how many unique passwords Now, the key here is to enforce any password policies that you put in place. The longer that any of your web app users uses the same password, the more at risk they — and you — are to different brute force attacks. You can also use password complexity checkers, meters, and password generators as well to help users generate better passwords. Tip 7: Educate Users About Password Security and Make the Process Easier Nearly half (49%) of data breaches reported in IBM and the Ponemon Institute’s were “inadvertent breaches” that resulted from good ol’ fashioned human errors and system glitches. 2019 Cost of a Data Breach Report So, while this really should go without saying, it bears repeating: Educate your users. Teach them about the and how to identify them. Teach them to use secure passwords (or, better, pass phrases) to secure their accounts. Demonstrate the advantages of using a password manager, which allows users to generate and store unique, complex passwords for all accounts. All they’d have to remember is one master password — it doesn’t get much easier than that! dangers of phishing attacks Implementing strong password security policies without first addressing the fallibility of human nature and our desire for convenience will always result in weak password security. So, educate your users while also allowing them to use a reputable password security manager. Final Thoughts From the data we’ve shared, it’s clear that credential compromise attacks are a significant issue for organizations regardless of size. There are multiple ways that you can your users’ accounts against brute force attacks and other credential-related threats. Cybercriminals aren’t going to stop trying to gain access to your accounts, and they’re going to use whatever means they have at their disposal. This means that to protect your business, you need to understand the tactics they use and layer your defenses to combat them.

7 Ways to Protect Your Company from Insecure Credentials

It all started when my father let me play with a soldering iron for the first time. Together we made a simple buzzer out of an old relay. Basically, if you apply an AC current to a relay, it will buzz, so we just wrapped it in a plastic box and soldered in two wires. I took it to my school and was showing it to everyone I knew. I was in the second grade. From that moment on, electronics became my hobby. While my friends were playing football outside, I was reading old Soviet books, and trying to make simple circuits work, even though I didn’t understand what exactly was going on. The title says “for the beginner radio-amateur” Analogous electronics was fun, but more complex circuits, like FM transmitters or receivers, rarely worked for me. Calculating and tuning them required solid knowledge of physics, which I didn’t have at that age. No wonder I was really amused by logical elements. It was so much simpler in the discrete world: no resistors or capacitors, just ones, and zeros. Draw a few boxes with different symbols inside, connect them with lines, put it on a board, and bang! You have a super fancy thing with a bunch of LEDs blinking in a specific order. As soon as I learned what the computer was, I immediately started dreaming about having one. I’ve got mine only in 7th grade, and before that, the smartest device I had was an old Soviet programmable calculator. It taught me concepts of , , and a -loop. It also had a decent 5V DC power adapter, which I used in dozens of my little projects, but real computers were so stunning and mesmerizing. GOTO IF WHILE Electronica MK-61 The early 2000s were the era of gaming clubs and “internet cafes” in ex-Soviet Union. I was saving all my pocket money so that I could once or twice a month get an hour of internet surfing at the local post office. I was quickly learning how the internet works, what are the , , and . By the 6th grade, I was already dreaming about having my own homepage. I even had one, created and hosted at one of the WYSIWYG website services, but it didn’t count as I didn’t program it myself. websites email search engines A typical computer club I’ve got my first computer right before starting my 7th year at the school. Single core , , , and a CRT monitor — pretty decent configuration for 2003. My very first CD was a compilation of various pirated (in our area there was no other) web-design software, along with an interactive and tutorial. Pretty soon I officially had a homepage, fully designed and implemented by myself. It was a long clunky thing on a yellow background, full of random text uglified in . I was the happiest kid on the planet! AMD Athlon 2000 XP 512 Mb Hynix RAM 80 GB Seagate Barracuda HDD, Nvidia GeForce 4 17" Samsung 76BDF HTML JavaScript Xara 3D I didn’t know what exactly the word “ ” means, but I knew for sure that my “ ” had to be more “ ,” so pretty soon I’ve got my first book on a real programming language: an introduction into . And then another one, about — a fancy, object-oriented Pascal, created by Borland. dynamic web pages dynamic PHP Delphi My first programming books Early 2000s were also the time of amateur ethernet LANs tangling around every big residential building. I was connected to , a.k.a. , named against our district number. My nickname was (a.k.a. ) or sometimes , or even on ocasions. It was a wild time of unpatched, windows machines, which anyone could remotely reboot by simply typing followed by an in a terminal. I’ve created a simple prank program in Delphi, which I would sneak onto my classmate’s computer, and then remotely open his CD-drive, flip the screen, or send weird sounds through the speakers. I’ve almost reached the state where I could monitor his screen, but suddenly antiviruses got smarter, and all my prank efforts were shut down. Nevertheless, I’ve learned some basic networking. z53 Zone 53 BSOD Blue Screen Of Death [b.s.o.d] -~=[B$0d]=~- pre-service pack one shutdown IP These things you would find on every roof or service floor of any residential building Somewhere around 2005, my school informatics teacher introduced me to the city’s programming club. Kids there were learning Pascal and then competing in solving various algorithmic puzzles taken from informatics olympiads. Best ones were sent to the national olympiad, and from there to the international, etc. It was a place full of interesting people like , or the other guy, whom I introduced to Linux, and the next month he was already building from scratch… in the 5th grade. this guy Gentoo Competing in olympiads taught me some real programming and algorithmic thinking, which helps me out till these days. That was also the place where I started learning English, as we were often practicing on tasks taken from old international contests and also competing remotely in . USACO Competitions were fun, but I was leaning more towards “tangible” programming — making something, that many people can interact with, and feel the result. I’ve created a very basic CMS in PHP. It didn’t have a template engine, and the whole logic was primarily based on overusing the statement. I didn’t have anything in particular to tell the world about, I just wanted to program, so I was simply running a website for someone else on my CMS, and it was about . Every kid was sick about parkour at that time, so the second user of my CMS turned out to be my school friend, who was running a local parkour portal. include gymnastics By 2006–2007 I had a decent skill, so I started taking occasional freelance jobs. Mostly they were simple contracts, but the biggest one was a “ application: we were scrapping news from some Spanish websites, running them through Google translate, and re-publishing in English. It was a savvy way for the customer to game search engine ranking algorithms, and for me, it was a rather complex several months project, that gave me , which I spent on buying an electric guitar. HTML/PHP PSD to HTML serious” first real $200 Two websites that were served by my first CMS (from web.archive.org) I wasn’t particularly good in programming olympiads and never compete at the international level, but my national results allowed me to enter a top university in the capital of Belarus without passing any exams. I’ve chosen with specialization in . University education consisted mostly of hardcore math, to which I developed taste only by the end of a third year, when it was already too late, and less than mediocre programming courses. I’ve gained some useful knowledge about , but mostly, university taught me how to pass exams while putting in the least effort possible. Applied Math Information Security cryptography fundamentals The summer after my second year at the university I spent in the USA. My school friend and I joined a program. It’s a program, where you get a visa for a summer and are supposed to work for three months at an entry-level job somewhere in the USA. The fourth month you can spend on traveling around the country. Our summer destination turned out to be — a b̶e̶a̶u̶t̶i̶f̶u̶l̶ and s̶a̶f̶e̶ coastal casino city in . We were 13 students living in a three bedroom apartment…Most of my roommates were selling ice-cream, washing dishes, or working at construction, but I’ve got my first freelance contract with a Silicon Valley company, which was paying twice as much compared to dishwashing! The only problem was that our house didn’t have a reliable wi-fi. Every morning I had to walk 2 miles to the public library, work there until 6 pm, and then move over to the mall, where I could catch a free wi-fi from a cafe, and work for an extra 2 hours until my laptop battery would drain. I was writing website scrappers for some education startup in . It was mostly a routine job of copying & modifying the same boilerplate code, but there were also gems. Some sites were actively protecting themselves from scrapping, so we were using a sophisticated pipeline, consisted of connecting via , over several machines, and receiving parsing tasks from a . If there’s something that job taught me, it’s a skill, which I nearly perfected. Work & Travel J1 Atlantic City New Jersey Java Selenium-controlled browsers TOR distributed AWS retry-queue regexp My stuff over my bed right before leaving Atlantic City After returning from the USA trip, I’ve teamed up with my university friend , and we started working on freelance contracts together. We were working from his home, and it was taking most of our time so that almost nothing was left to actually studying at the university. We started from small PHP contracts but quickly switched to and single page web applications written in various javascript frameworks. Over time I gravitated towards the backend, and Andrew became a pure frontend developer. By the last year of study, we were deep into freelance work, and we had to choose what are we going to do after graduation: get a “normal” (regular) job, continue freelancing as is, or scale up by hiring more people. Needless to say, we’ve chosen the latter. That’s how the next chapter of my engineering, and now entrepreneurial career began — an outsourcing company . Andrew Python Upsilon IT My desk at the first Upsilon IT office Upsilon had a pretty rough start: we didn’t have enough experience for the jobs we were taking, we didn’t know anything about hiring, and couldn’t hire people we needed, we didn’t know how to deal with customers. We had to overcompensate with immense amounts of work and resourcefulness. A few times we were running into situations when every client delayed payment, and on a payday, we had 0 on our bank account, so we had to borrow money from relatives to pay out salaries. We survived, everything stabilized eventually, and now Upsilon IT is a happy, ~50 people company, .Nothing has taught me as much as Upsilon yet. Besides the engineering skills, it showed me how to deal with the world stuff, not challenges from the university or competitions. I’ve learned how to communicate with people, how to understand what they actually want ( ), how to convey thoughts, how to hire, how to fire. University wasn’t teaching any of these. offering all sorts of web engineering real fake and need Outsourcing was of course interesting and well paying, but we always wanted something bigger — our own product. Oslo, during the trip to the client In 2014 I participated in the , and suddenly won a green card. We had a lot of discussion with my wife, but the conclusion was that if we go — we go to the Silicon Valley, to learn how the real IT industry works, and how people build . US diversity lottery real stuff We moved to the USA in spring 2015. I wanted to try working for a startup as a full-time employee, so I sold my half of Upsilon IT to Andrew, as I wasn’t helping the company anymore. After temporarily settling in Santa Clara I began my job hunt. Big companies never attracted me, so I was never seriously considering them, though I tried my luck with a few. I wanted to observe things from a close distance, and my real goal was a “ ” stage startup with a hundred people or so. late early I started going through interviews, and quickly realized that it wasn’t what I expected! I thought that they would consist mostly of conversations about my experience, but people were asking me ! It’s somehow assumed here that by asking a person and , you are testing for problem-solving skills. But I haven’t done that for years! After failing first few interviews, I spent two or three weeks just brushing up what I was doing back in high school. That quickly paid off — whiteboard interviews became a breeze, I’ve passed an on-site with Google, but even before I knew the result, I’ve already accepted an offer from — a prominent BI startup from Palo Alto. I knew nothing about BI, but the engineering interview was so in-depth, and people were so smart, that I was eager to start working with them immediately. algorithms RMQ LCA ThoughtSpot An after-interview post card signed by the ThoughtSpot engineering team Next 2.5 years I spent in ThoughtSpot. For the first time in my life, I was touching “big engineering.” These people wrote a database from scratch and were shipping their own appliance, and I… I’ve never seen a server unit before. A transition from an employer to an employee was also pretty unusual. I now had a boss, or even two, and was receiving, not distributing tasks. Eventually, I fit in, and the next two and a half years were the most significant boost of my engineering skill. I learned about in-memory databases, highly parallel computations, distributed systems, high availability, enterprise products, etc., etc. I became proficient with Docker and Kubernetes, and even wrote a about them. Visited an OSDI conference, and learned Go programming. ThoughtSpot has recently become a unicorn, but I it almost a year ago to embark on my own journey again. few articles left OneBar team in the Minsk office As I mentioned before, Andrew and I always wanted to build a real software product that would be serving real people’s needs. I always considered my move to the Silicon Valley as a learning trip, not a career destination, and a year ago I started to feel that there’s enough learning — it’s time for action! We picked an area where we had the most experience — communication in large distributed teams. Communication and knowledge sharing is the essence of any company productivity, and yet it wasn’t right at any project, we had to deal with before. We’ve assembled a four people team (of me, Andrew, and two more Upsilon guys), tried out one idea, which didn’t quite work, and right now working on the second one, which we feel has a much higher potential. I’m on my own again, and everything feels new and exciting. I have a lot of enthusiasm for our new project, and I’m again learning! Recently I had to temporarily return to ThoughtSpot as a part-time contractor so that I can support my life here in Silicon Valley, but I’m still dedicating most of my time to the project. I’m picking up lots of new skills, which I would never need, had a been a regular software engineer: , , , , , , and many more. Even though it doesn’t pay me back in money (yet), I’m already considering the whole idea a success, as it’s all essentially a way way better learning experience than any top university. design marketing talking on the phone (!) writing presenting telling stories With that, I’m going to conclude my story for now, and go back to working on . Looking forward to writing the next article about all the learnings we’ve gained in the process of building it! OneBar I encourage you, the brave reader, who’ve reached to the bottom of this article, to go and check out what we’re building , and consider signing up for a beta if your team actively uses Slack. here Thank you!Good luck, and peace! Links Another reason why your Docker containers may be slow Kubernetes for dev infrastructure A Knowledge Base in your Slack

BARRACUDA NETWORKS

barracudanetworks.com

-- employees

Since n.d.

COMPANY RANKING

BARRACUDA NETWORKS

EVERGREEN INDEX #1622

Representing this company? Click here to claim and customize this page!

Barracuda Networks WIKI

Apply to get your Tech Company News Page live on HackerNoon.com today!

BARRACUDA NETWORKS

barracudanetworks.com

-- employees

Since n.d.

COMPANY RANKING

BARRACUDA NETWORKS

EVERGREEN INDEX #1622

RELATED COMPANIESRANK

STORIES ABOUT BARRACUDA NETWORKS

Representing this company? Click here to claim and customize this page!

Barracuda Networks WIKI

Apply to get your Tech Company News Page live on HackerNoon.com today!