Larger GPU Instances don’t always mean faster Processing The artificial intelligence, machine learning, and generative AI application's growth have swelled the demand for high-performance GPU workloads. To fulfill these needs, cloud services have introduced a broad range of instances to fulfill diverse needs. For many, has been a quick fix to increase computational power by replacing a smaller instance with a more powerful one. However, this methodology might be less effective or even pointless for GPU-intensive workloads. vertical scaling Understanding GPU Workloads GPUs are designed for high-speed mathematical calculations. These specialized computational capabilities make them a good choice or, for some applications, the only option for handling large dataset mathematical operations in machine learning (ML) and video editing. CPUs’ primary aim is to perform sequential task execution, whereas GPUs excel as workhorses when it comes to deep learning, 3D rendering, and scientific computations. The Basics of GPU Scaling Instances can be scaled vertically, horizontally, or through a combination of both as explained . The Vertical scaling strategy means upgrading to a larger server with more computational power, such as CPU, memory, and GPU. here The Horizontal scaling strategy involves adding more instances instead of upgrading the current one, hence increasing resources in parallel, very much like buying additional properties in the neighborhood to accommodate your growing family. Limitations of Vertical Scaling for GPUs Vertical scaling's effectiveness is evident when we need more CPU or memory resources, but it hits a roadblock with GPU workloads. This is because upgrading to a larger instance does not necessarily increase the GPU's computational power. For example, the instances from AWS both house the Nvidia Tesla T4 and T4G respectively. g5g.large and g4dn.large Despite any vertical scaling between these instance types, the GPU power remains unchanged, as they contain the same number of GPU cores as shown in the following image. Hence, vertical scaling will not address the actual bottleneck in GPU-intensive tasks. Practical Implications The implication is evident: when your application demands more GPU power, vertically scaling your instance will not deliver the required performance improvements. This inefficiency can lead to not just stagnant performance, but also increased costs, as you are paying for additional CPU and memory resources that your workload may never utilize. An Alternative to Vertical Scaling When the bottleneck is GPU computational capabilities, horizontal scaling becomes a more viable solution. By adding more instances to your cloud infrastructure, you can achieve a near-linear increase in GPU capabilities. Horizontal scaling with the right kind of servers will improve your infrastructure's resource utilization, thus offering a more cost-effective solution. Training an ML model with a vertically scaled server will add more CPU and memory but will not improve GPU power. Therefore, there will not be any improvement in training time. Shifting to horizontal scaling, with multiple GPU instances working in tandem, can significantly reduce the training time, showcasing the right approach to scaling for such tasks. Conclusion While vertical scaling offers a quick solution for prompt performance boost in certain scenarios, it falls short with the GPU instances option available. I highly recommend checking out for a deeper understanding of when to employ each strategy. horizontal and vertical scaling A nuanced grasp of these scaling methods is crucial for optimizing performance and effective cost management in various computational scenarios. For tasks that are GPU-bound, adding more GPU power through horizontal scaling or re-architecting the solution is often the more effective path. Even for horizontal scaling, opt for the least powered instance, such as or , to avoid paying for extra unused CPU power that is not required. Adopting the right scaling strategy, you can ensure that your infrastructure is not just robust but also cost-effective and performance-optimized for your specific computational needs. G5g.xlarge G4dn.xlarge More From the Author Learn About the Issues and Solution at Is AWS Deep Learning AMIs saving you time? A counterproductive approach hindering your progress! How Your AWS Deep Learning AMI is Holding You Back Read the full article at: A Cost-Effective Creating Deep Learning AMIs deployment with Spot Instances: Navigate parallel frontier! Deep Learning on AWS Graviton2 powered by Nvidia Tensor T4g A comprehensive guide is available at . Fine-Tune FFmpeg for Optimal Performance with detailed compilation guide: Optimize your multimedia backend for optimal performance! Tailor FFmpeg for your needs

The is an opinion piece based on the author’s POV and does not necessarily reflect the views of HackerNoon.

This story contains new, firsthand information uncovered by the writer.

Improve System Insights: Build Your Own Log Visualization Pipeline

Choosing Baseline GPU Instances: What Are the Advantages?

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Untitled Story

CPU vs. GPU for Video Transcoding: Challenging the Cost-Speed Myth

101 Stories To Learn About Cloud Infrastructure

10 Things in Engineering We Don't Spend Enough Time On

10 Things I Did To Increase CloudTrail Logs Security

10 reasons to give cloud computing a go

CPU vs. GPU for Video Transcoding: Challenging the Cost-Speed Myth

101 Stories To Learn About Cloud Infrastructure

10 Things in Engineering We Don't Spend Enough Time On

10 Things I Did To Increase CloudTrail Logs Security

10 reasons to give cloud computing a go

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps