Today, we live in what can sometimes feel like a digital utopia, one where the internet brings the world closer together. Social platforms mediate communication and connect us regardless of time, place, or distance. But with this powerful connection comes a growing need for regulation and control. Censorship is the restriction of interactions and the flow of information online, typically controlled by a few powerful tech companies—and sometimes government bodies—who run the platforms we depend on. Through algorithms, these platforms determine what content we see and what gets silenced. They access the data we provide, knowingly or unknowingly. And over time, this growing influence over our freedom of expression has sparked growing concern. Is our privacy protected? Do we truly have freedom of expression, as we believe we do? As these questions arise, so does the idea of a decentralized internet. An internet where control shifts from corporations & governments to individuals—a democratized internet. How Centralized Platforms Enable Online Censorship How Centralized Platforms Enable Online Censorship Tech giants like Google, Facebook, Amazon, and Microsoft own the web, literally. To regulate activity on their platforms, they use policies enforced by algorithms. Facebook also relies on human moderators to identify profiles that violate its community guidelines. And they also encourage users to self-censor. These systems aim to filter out harmful content for users. However, algorithms are also allowed to control what content is displayed and to whom. Algorithmic bias can hide posts, even when they don’t violate any guidelines per se. These social platforms also collect user data to personalize content feeds and target ads. This data, such as name, age, and location, is often shared with third parties for profit. Governments also play a role in censorship. In China, for example, state-run algorithms, like the Great Firewall, censor political content. Another instance is this news report by Al Jazeera, where Mark Zuckerberg claimed that the U.S. government pressured him to censor COVID-related posts. These cases raise ethical concerns about who decides what we see online. Great Firewall this news report by Al Jazeera Promise of Decentralization Promise of Decentralization Decentralization means no single entity owns or controls the internet. Instead, the internet becomes user-controlled and democratized. Power is distributed across users through peer-to-peer (P2P) systems and blockchain technology. P2P networks eliminate the need for a central server, such as Facebook, allowing users to interact directly with each other. While blockchain ensures data is secure, transparent, and immutable (not easily tampered with or altered). Decentralization also promises censorship resistance: technologies like IPFS (InterPlanetary File System) give users control over their content. IPFS distributes data across multiple servers, reducing the chances of unauthorized access, unlike centralized systems (Brave). This system makes sure that no one party can single-handedly remove or restrict content, which encourages transparency and reduces censorship. (Brave) Is It Possible to Have an Internet Free from Censorship? Is It Possible to Have an Internet Free from Censorship? Although decentralized systems are already being implemented, they won't completely replace centralized ones just yet. A complete shift would depend on our willingness to trade the convenience of centralized systems for control, as well as policy changes to dismantle centralized corporate giants. A truly censorship-free internet may be more idealistic than realistic. Why? Because big companies have deep resources and powerful influence. A more likely outcome is a hybrid model, where centralized platforms integrate decentralized tools, providing users with more transparency and choice. hybrid model Even in decentralized systems, gatekeepers will still exist, such as developers with coding expertise, influential users who may attempt to dominate the system, or malicious actors seeking to exploit it. Harmful content and misinformation may still spread, and these platforms could still be compromised. Free speech is important, yes, but honestly not all speech should be allowed to thrive. And I agree with Volker Türk when he said, “Allowing hate speech and harmful content online has real-world consequences” (source). More reasons why a censorship-free internet may not be realistic. (source) New Forms of Control New Forms of Control Decentralization is promising, indeed. While it offers more freedom, we can't overlook the possible challenges it introduces. This raises the question: Would a decentralized internet mean that anyone can spread any form of information, including both valuable and harmful content? Well, no. On a decentralized internet, control has simply shifted and hasn’t been cancelled. Here, regulation becomes a collective responsibility. Communities make decisions through voting or smart contracts (self-executing digital agreements coded into the system). For instance, a community might use a smart contract to remove posts containing nudity automatically. These rules can’t be changed unless a new contract is created to override the old one. smart contracts DAOs (Decentralized Autonomous Organisations) are another form of decentralized governance. In these systems, those with more technical skill or greater token ownership often become the new gatekeepers and control decision-making. DAOs Conclusion Conclusion For a free and open internet to exist, we must address the flaws in centralized systems and build better, fairer alternatives. Decentralization may not eliminate censorship completely, but it offers the tools to create a more transparent and participatory web. In my opinion, the future of internet control isn’t about choosing one model over the other. Instead, it’s about reshaping the balance of power so everyone has a voice! Sources Sources Britannica. (2025). Great Firewall. Link.
Al Jazeera. (2024). Did Biden’s White House pressure Mark Zuckerberg to censor COVID content? Link.
Brave. IPFS Meaning & Definition. Link.
United Nations. (2025). It’s not censorship to stop hateful online content, insists UN rights chief. Link.
What are Smart Contracts in Crypto? (4 Examples + Animated) Britannica. (2025). Great Firewall. Link. Link. Al Jazeera. (2024). Did Biden’s White House pressure Mark Zuckerberg to censor COVID content? Link. Link. Brave. IPFS Meaning & Definition. Link. Link. United Nations. (2025). It’s not censorship to stop hateful online content, insists UN rights chief. Link. Link. What are Smart Contracts in Crypto? (4 Examples + Animated) What are Smart Contracts in Crypto? (4 Examples + Animated)

The is an opinion piece based on the author’s POV and does not necessarily reflect the views of HackerNoon.

This story contains AI-generated text. The author has used AI either for research, to generate outlines, or write the text itself. 

Can Decentralization Save the Internet from Itself?

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Untitled Story

Can Gluwa Solve Nigeria's Financial Inclusion Problem

HackerNoon Partners with AIESEC in Nigeria to Empower the Next Generation of Thought Leaders

Cosmic DePIN: How Space‑Based Decentralized Networks Will Redefine Connectivity

Decentralization Won't Save Us From Ourselves

Can You Own a Star?

Can Gluwa Solve Nigeria's Financial Inclusion Problem

HackerNoon Partners with AIESEC in Nigeria to Empower the Next Generation of Thought Leaders

Cosmic DePIN: How Space‑Based Decentralized Networks Will Redefine Connectivity

Decentralization Won't Save Us From Ourselves

Can You Own a Star?

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps