The prompt: "Can you tell me what is the most likely outcome of the Musk vs. OpenAI court case/s? Please make a table with % outcome." "Can you tell me what is the most likely outcome of the Musk vs. OpenAI court case/s? Please make a table with % outcome." "Can you tell me what is the most likely outcome of the Musk vs. OpenAI court case/s? Please make a table with % outcome." I didn't want to provide the AI with any other context. Keep it simple. They gather their own context. They provide as much additional context as they see fit. And lets see what it unfolds from whose perspective... GEMINI (Google) OUTPUT STATEMENT Gemini is the most bullish on pre trial settlement. They are the only AI that sees it as more likely than all other outcomes combined. Also, they are the least bullish on any Musk win (totaling only 15%). CLAUDE (Anthropic) OUTPUT STATEMENT Claude introduces a new category: a Musk substantial victory, which is not a full victory, but enough to force OpenAI to dissolve or be sold.  They are also the only AI company that predicts the most likely outcome is OpenAI winning in a trial (37.5%). CHATGPT (OpenAI) OUTPUT STATEMENT After Google, ChatGPT is most bullish on a settlement (40%), but ironically is the least confident in OpenAI's likelihood to win in full at trial (20%).  ChatGPT also ties Grok as the most bullish on a partial Musk win at trial (35%). GROK (Xai) OUTPUT STATEMENT Grok is the most bullish on Musk winning something (45% total across all win categories) and at least twice as bullish as any other model for Musk wins in full (10%). A few notes: All output screenshots were from the last 24 hours on paid subscriptions. Post publication, they may change. Every AI model has insider knowledge of the company that created them. This includes potential bias and self-interest toward cases involving or affecting their creators or owners.Claude generated the graph of the lead image. I'm bookending this post with it here again: All output screenshots were from the last 24 hours on paid subscriptions. Post publication, they may change. Every AI model has insider knowledge of the company that created them. This includes potential bias and self-interest toward cases involving or affecting their creators or owners. Claude generated the graph of the lead image. I'm bookending this post with it here again:

The writer is smart, but don't just like, take their word for it. #DoYourOwnResearch before making any investment decisions or decisions regarding your health or security. (Do not regard any of this content as professional investment advice, or health advice)

The is an opinion piece based on the author’s POV and does not necessarily reflect the views of HackerNoon.

Google

The Words of Interest Benchmark Test For Matching an LLM to Your Interests

Meet a HackerNoon Human About Business Blogging

Asking ChatGPT, Grok, Claude, and Gemini: What's the Most Likely Outcome of the Musk vs OpenAI Case?

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

PB & J: WHAT IS IT GOOD FOR ??

The Noonification: How Often Do NFTs Pass The Howey Test? (1/13/2023)

Darwin's Hybrid Intelligence to Align AI & Human Goals for Startups & VCs

The Noonification: White Man (11/26/2022)

The Noonification: The Metaverse is a Sh*tshow (11/2/2022)

100 Days of AI Day 1: From Newsletter to Podcast, Leveraging AI for Audio Transformation

PB & J: WHAT IS IT GOOD FOR ??

The Noonification: How Often Do NFTs Pass The Howey Test? (1/13/2023)

Darwin's Hybrid Intelligence to Align AI & Human Goals for Startups & VCs

The Noonification: White Man (11/26/2022)

The Noonification: The Metaverse is a Sh*tshow (11/2/2022)

100 Days of AI Day 1: From Newsletter to Podcast, Leveraging AI for Audio Transformation

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Minty

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps