There are two key requirements for the success of any digital product — ease of access and a user-friendly interface and experience. If this wasn’t the case, Linux-based OS systems would trump MacOS and Windows. This is also the reason why GPT, Claude, and Grok models are triumphing over open-source LLMs like the Llama and Mistral series, even when the latter provide some incredible utility with great customizations. I think OpenAI and DeepSeek present interesting case studies here. DeepSeek is making open-source foundational models, but if it didn’t also provide services directly through its web interface and the iPhone app — there is fat chance it could disrupt the U.S. markets the way it did. Like DeepSeek was doing before, it would have remained a product that nerdy devs talked about as the “real deal” in their small circles, as was happening in months preceding the mania that surrounded the Chinese company. OpenAI similarly built open-source models in shadows for roughly seven years between 2015 and 2022 — until it launched ChatGPT. I’m sure you remember what that was like. To Llama, Or Not To Llama One constraint in the more widespread utility of open-source models is technical skills — that one is more obvious. But when it comes to LLMs — it’s actually also money. 💸 You see, running open-source models requires GPUs. Some small open-source models can run on consumer GPUs like the one I have in my top-of-the-line M3 Max Macbook Pro with 36 GB of memory. But others require dedicated ones. Meta this weekend dropped the Llama 4 series of models, including the Maverick and Scout LLMs, and announced plans to release Behemoth at a later date. There are no updates yet on the reasoning model from the fourth series, except for a nerdy-looking Llama telling us it is “coming soon.” Here is the most eyebrow-raising bit about Llama 4: As Meta keeps chasing more and more parameters in its LLMs, the cost to acquire the hardware to run these models gets ridiculous. It’s a bit early and I haven’t analyzed every information available on developers trying to run the models on different devices but it seems that the minimum requirement to comfortably run the lower-end Scout model is a single Nvidia H100 GPU, which costs roughly $40,000 — provided you can manage to get your hands on one. If Sam Altman, with his hundreds of billions of dollars, struggles to find GPUs, so does this poverty-struck startup founder. Mixture of Experts Having said that, there is one interesting thing that makes it possible to run the Llama 4 line on Apple products — the possibility of the Mac Studio with 128 GB memory or above. That is a Mixture of Experts. Some of the earlier LLMs were actually a single model trained on a whole swath of data from across domains like GPT-3 or the original Llama. But companies are rapidly switching to a mixture of experts concept. This means that even though we see Llama 4 Scout as a single model that we are talking to, it is actually deciding between 16 separate trained models on which one will respond to the query, based on whether we asked it a math question or asked it to spark creativity. This is different from the traditional dense models that operated on single monolithic networks, where all of the parameters of the LLMs were activated for every query. So, even if you asked it “what’s 2+2,” it would active all of its knowledge on Socrates and Plato’s philosophies. Dear Zuck, Size Doesn’t Matter Setting aside the difficulties of running the Llama 4 series, even the ones who have tried it (mostly through Groq/OpenRouter) are less than impressed. The Llama 4 series isn’t doing great at coding or deep questions — but seems to love emojis (and me ❤️). So here goes, even as companies keep obsessing over increasing the parameters in the training of foundational LLMs, which doesn’t seem to be improving things. In fact, it may have opened a key business opportunity that we thought of as closed so far. That of training more domain-specific niche models. As noted by AI researcher Andriy Burkov, if your business idea isn't in the math and coding or factual question-answering domains, there is a great opportunity to build your business-specific dataset. The potential increase in generalist models' skills will no longer be a threat. So, is now the time we make our own LLM at Dzambhala Finance? Perhaps, but we need enough revenue to sustain a bigger database. This post is republished from the Artificially Boosted newsletter that goes out every week. There are two key requirements for the success of any digital product — ease of access and a user-friendly interface and experience. If this wasn’t the case, Linux-based OS systems would trump MacOS and Windows. This is also the reason why GPT, Claude, and Grok models are triumphing over open-source LLMs like the Llama and Mistral series, even when the latter provide some incredible utility with great customizations. I think OpenAI and DeepSeek present interesting case studies here. DeepSeek is making open-source foundational models, but if it didn’t also provide services directly through its web interface and the iPhone app — there is fat chance it could disrupt the U.S. markets the way it did. the iPhone app Like DeepSeek was doing before, it would have remained a product that nerdy devs talked about as the “real deal” in their small circles, as was happening in months preceding the mania that surrounded the Chinese company. OpenAI similarly built open-source models in shadows for roughly seven years between 2015 and 2022 — until it launched ChatGPT. I’m sure you remember what that was like. To Llama, Or Not To Llama One constraint in the more widespread utility of open-source models is technical skills — that one is more obvious. But when it comes to LLMs — it’s actually also money. 💸 You see, running open-source models requires GPUs. Some small open-source models can run on consumer GPUs like the one I have in my top-of-the-line M3 Max Macbook Pro with 36 GB of memory. But others require dedicated ones. Meta this weekend dropped the Llama 4 series of models, including the Maverick and Scout LLMs, and announced plans to release Behemoth at a later date. There are no updates yet on the reasoning model from the fourth series, except for a nerdy-looking Llama telling us it is “coming soon.” telling us Here is the most eyebrow-raising bit about Llama 4: As Meta keeps chasing more and more parameters in its LLMs, the cost to acquire the hardware to run these models gets ridiculous. It’s a bit early and I haven’t analyzed every information available on developers trying to run the models on different devices but it seems that the minimum requirement to comfortably run the lower-end Scout model is a single Nvidia H100 GPU, which costs roughly $40,000 — provided you can manage to get your hands on one. provided you can manage to get your hands on one. If Sam Altman, with his hundreds of billions of dollars, struggles to find GPUs, so does this poverty-struck startup founder. Mixture of Experts Having said that, there is one interesting thing that makes it possible to run the Llama 4 line on Apple products — the possibility of the Mac Studio with 128 GB memory or above. That is a Mixture of Experts. Some of the earlier LLMs were actually a single model trained on a whole swath of data from across domains like GPT-3 or the original Llama. But companies are rapidly switching to a mixture of experts concept. This means that even though we see Llama 4 Scout as a single model that we are talking to, it is actually deciding between 16 separate trained models on which one will respond to the query, based on whether we asked it a math question or asked it to spark creativity. This is different from the traditional dense models that operated on single monolithic networks, where all of the parameters of the LLMs were activated for every query. So, even if you asked it “what’s 2+2,” it would active all of its knowledge on Socrates and Plato’s philosophies. Dear Zuck, Size Doesn’t Matter Setting aside the difficulties of running the Llama 4 series, even the ones who have tried it (mostly through Groq/OpenRouter) are less than impressed. The Llama 4 series isn’t doing great at coding or deep questions — but seems to love emojis (and me ❤️). So here goes, even as companies keep obsessing over increasing the parameters in the training of foundational LLMs, which doesn’t seem to be improving things. In fact, it may have opened a key business opportunity that we thought of as closed so far. That of training more domain-specific niche models. As noted by AI researcher Andriy Burkov, if your business idea isn't in the math and coding or factual question-answering domains, there is a great opportunity to build your business-specific dataset . there is a great opportunity to build your business-specific dataset The potential increase in generalist models' skills will no longer be a threat. So, is now the time we make our own LLM at Dzambhala Finance? Perhaps, but we need enough revenue to sustain a bigger database. This post is republished from the Artificially Boosted newsletter that goes out every week. This post is republished from the Artificially Boosted newsletter that goes out every week. Artificially Boosted newsletter

The is an opinion piece based on the author’s POV and does not necessarily reflect the views of HackerNoon.

Apple

OpenAI

If Getting Laid-off is Bad, Wait Till You See What AI Does to Corporates

Why I Stopped Giving $20 A Month To ChatGPT

Subscribe Now

Dzambhala Finance

TushitaAI

About Author

Read My Stories

Too Long; Didn't Read

Boost your HackerNoon story @ $159.99! 🚀

An Open Letter To Mark Zuckerberg: Size Doesn't Matter

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

AI Agents Need To Come With An Emergency Button

The Noonification: Use This 7-Step McKinsey Framework to Solve Any Problem (1/10/2023)

The Noonification: A Taxonomy of Inclusiveness (1/11/2024)

The Noonification: What is the InfiniteNature-Zero AI Model? (11/19/2022)

10 Ways AI Has Changed Our Lives

100 Days of AI, Day 8: Experimenting With Microsoft's Semantic Kernel Using GPT-4

AI Agents Need To Come With An Emergency Button

The Noonification: Use This 7-Step McKinsey Framework to Solve Any Problem (1/10/2023)

The Noonification: A Taxonomy of Inclusiveness (1/11/2024)

The Noonification: What is the InfiniteNature-Zero AI Model? (11/19/2022)

10 Ways AI Has Changed Our Lives

100 Days of AI, Day 8: Experimenting With Microsoft's Semantic Kernel Using GPT-4

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps