In B2B sales, speed of response defines who wins the client. Every hour between a commercial proposal and a company’s reply can decide whether a deal closes or slips away. Yet, in 2025, many organizations still rely on manual processing: sales teams wading through non-standard emails, Excel sheets, and PDFs, copying data into CRMs by hand. The result: delays, errors, and lost opportunities. Managers spend hours extracting line items, prices, and delivery terms instead of actually talking to customers. Over the past few years, I’ve led several projects aimed at fixing this — building AI systems that can parse incoming proposals, extract structured data, and automatically feed it into ERP or CRM platforms within minutes. The impact has been transformative: faster response times, fewer errors, and a tangible speed-to-lead advantage that’s nearly impossible to match manually. The impact has been transformative: faster response times, fewer errors, and a tangible speed-to-lead advantage that’s nearly impossible to match manually. The question isn’t whether proposal processing can be automated, but how fast a company is ready to let AI handle the routine and focus people where they add real value. The Problem Every company that deals with B2B requests knows the pain of parsing incoming proposals. They arrive from everywhere: emails, web forms, attached PDFs, Excel files, even messages with tables copied directly into the text body. Each contains key data: lists of products or services, contact information, quantities, delivery terms, and special conditions. On paper, extracting this data and uploading it to ERP or CRM systems seems trivial. In reality, it’s a process full of friction: Templates vary wildly between clients,
fields appear in random order,
formats shift from one document to the next. Templates vary wildly between clients, fields appear in random order, formats shift from one document to the next. Some send PDFs with embedded images instead of text; others rely on Excel sheets with merged cells or hidden columns. Sales teams end up spending hours copying and cleaning information, line by line. Minor errors (a misplaced decimal, a missing delivery date) can derail an order. When hundreds of proposals come in weekly, manual processing becomes not just inefficient, but a structural bottleneck. The problem isn’t lack of data. It’s that the data arrives in forms designed for humans to read, not for systems to process. AI, when properly trained, can close that gap, transforming raw, inconsistent proposal data into clean, actionable input for business systems in minutes. How the AI Solution Works I’ve worked on multiple AI systems for automated proposal parsing over the past 3 years, and here is what usually goes on in these systems under the hood: Intake and Monitoring Intake and Monitoring Intake and Monitoring The system continuously monitors incoming channels, e.g. corporate email, customer portals, or request inboxes, and identifies messages containing commercial proposals or tenders. Data Extraction Data Extraction Data Extraction Using NLP and document-structure models, the AI detects and interprets elements like product tables, line items, prices, dates, and addresses. It doesn’t depend on fixed templates: trained on hundreds of real examples, it learns to adapt to irregular layouts and mixed content. Normalization and Structuring Normalization and Structuring Normalization and Structuring Extracted information is cleaned and aligned to corporate standards, e.g. converting product names, units, or codes into formats compatible with ERP or CRM databases. This step ensures that data doesn’t just look correct, but actually fits into the company’s digital workflow. System Integration System Integration System Integration Once normalized, the data is automatically pushed to ERP, CRM, or procurement platforms via APIs. New opportunities or draft orders are created instantly, ready for review or approval. Validation and Quality Control Validation and Quality Control Validation and Quality Control The AI performs internal checks: verifying that mandatory fields are filled, comparing entries against previous orders, and flagging incomplete or inconsistent data. Ambiguous cases are routed to managers for quick confirmation. Notifications and Exceptions Notifications and Exceptions Notifications and Exceptions Completed entries trigger notifications to responsible staff. Exceptions are logged and displayed in a review dashboard, making human oversight efficient rather than manual. The result is not magic — it’s systematic acceleration. What once took 30 minutes per proposal now takes less than five. Managers no longer lose time retyping data, and the organization gains the one thing manual processes could never deliver: consistent speed. Real Examples Of AI In Action I’ve seen this work out in real-life situations, in real companies, in real business processes. Below are three notable examples of successful AI implementation for those thinking, “just another AI trend”. In fact it’s not a trend, it’s not AI for the sake of AI. This approach to automating a business process brings real, tangible results to companies from various industries dealing with a large variety of documents. Exhibit One: Government Procurement In government procurement, precision and timing are everything. Vendors must respond to equipment and product requests quickly, often through unstructured emails with attached PDFs or Excel sheets. Before automation, employees manually searched each request for item details, quantities, and delivery data, then entered them into ERP systems, a process that could take tens of minutes per proposal and was prone to human error. After implementing AI parsing, the workflow changed dramatically. The system now scans all incoming emails, identifies relevant attachments, extracts order numbers, items, and delivery information, validates the data, and uploads it directly to ERP. Only edge cases that don’t fit known patterns require human review. Processing time dropped from 20–30 minutes to just a few,
Errors were nearly eliminated,
Employees shifted their focus from data entry to analytics and quality control. Processing time dropped from 20–30 minutes to just a few, Errors were nearly eliminated, Employees shifted their focus from data entry to analytics and quality control. The automation not only sped up daily operations but also made procurement more transparent and auditable, essential for government suppliers dealing with strict compliance requirements. Exhibit Two: Maritime Shipping Maritime logistics has its own language: every shipping request includes dozens of parameters: routes, cargo types, dimensions, schedules, insurance conditions. The documents are rarely standardized, making automation a serious technical challenge. The AI solution was trained on thousands of real shipping requests, learning to identify patterns in free-form text and non-standard tables. It extracts cargo details, loading and unloading ports, shipment terms, and technical parameters, then synchronizes this data with the company’s ERP system through an API. Previously, staff could spend hours decoding and retyping each request. Now, the same process takes minutes, with the AI correctly handling even complex or irregular templates. The system continues to learn from each new case, improving accuracy and resilience over time. Faster input times,
Fewer mistakes,
The ability to respond to shipping inquiries before competitors even start processing them, a major operational advantage. Faster input times, Fewer mistakes, The ability to respond to shipping inquiries before competitors even start processing them, a major operational advantage. Exhibit Three: Tender Proposals Tenders are a special kind of administrative overload. Companies bidding for government or corporate contracts often face hundreds of pages of documentation, each with unique formats, requirements, and submission rules. Manually preparing applications can take entire teams several days. AI-based automation fundamentally changed that. The system connects to corporate email and tender platforms, recognizes document structures, extracts critical parameters, from item lists to deadlines and compliance criteria, and automatically prepares draft submissions. The AI checks for completeness, flags missing data, and even tracks regulatory updates across tender sources. Managers only review exceptions or approve finalized entries. What used to take several days now takes a few hours,
Errors decreased drastically,
Rejected applications virtually at a zero,
Teams can now focus on strategy instead of drowning in administrative work. What used to take several days now takes a few hours, Errors decreased drastically, Rejected applications virtually at a zero, Teams can now focus on strategy instead of drowning in administrative work. When AI Doesn’t Work Working on creating these AI systems, I’ve seen not only successes, but failures as well. It’s important to focus on the bad too, as it can save some of you a lot of money and time on AI projects that are doomed from the start. AI can process text, tables, and structured fields faster and more accurately than humans. But even the most advanced models reach their limits when faced with tasks that require deep contextual or spatial understanding, something that comes naturally to humans but remains difficult for machines. A good example comes from the furniture industry. A company received orders in the form of floor plans specifying furniture placement for schools and hospitals. The plans contained visual layouts rather than tabular data. While the AI could technically read and interpret the drawings, it struggled to make nuanced distinctions between similar-looking items, like chairs differing by hinge type, cabinet dimensions, or drawer count. These subtle differences were obvious to human designers but not to the model, even after months of training and annotation. The lesson is clear: Automation thrives when data has a consistent structure: text, tables, lists, or repeatable fields. Automation thrives when data has a consistent structure: text, tables, lists, or repeatable fields. But when proposals rely on complex spatial or visual logic, human expertise remains irreplaceable. The smartest systems recognize where they shouldn’t act autonomously. Requirements for Deployment Successful AI implementation is less about algorithms and more about preparation. The companies that benefit the most are those that organize their data and processes before the first model is even trained. Here’s what my experience shows as essential: Standardized Inputs Standardized Inputs Even minimal consistency helps. Structured fields for product names, quantities, prices, and delivery details dramatically improve model accuracy. Historical Training Data Historical Training Data A repository of past proposals, including emails, attachments, and filled forms, is vital. Annotated examples of correct and incorrect entries speed up learning and reduce false positives. System Integration System Integration The AI must connect seamlessly with ERP, CRM, or document management systems via APIs or webhooks. Automation should end with a ready-to-use record, not a half-finished file. Error Handling and Human Oversight Error Handling and Human Oversight Not every input will be perfect. There must be workflows for review, correction, and feedback, ensuring that each exception makes the model smarter over time. Continuous Maintenance Continuous Maintenance Post-deployment support includes retraining models, refining business logic, updating integrations, and occasionally adjusting to new document formats. AI is not a static tool; it evolves with the organization. When these prerequisites are met, automation doesn’t just save time, it transforms how proposals move through the company. The Hell Yeahs and the Oh Nos The biggest advantage of almost any AI system is speed. In most cases, companies see measurable improvements within the first month: order processing time drops, managers respond faster, and conversion rates rise because leads are handled while they’re still warm. Accuracy follows naturally. Since AI validates and normalizes data automatically, error rates shrink dramatically, often by more than half compared to manual input. Managers get cleaner data, faster analytics, and fewer unpleasant surprises downstream. However, automation isn’t plug-and-play. Some of the Oh Nos I’ve ran into before include: Data preparation overload: Collecting and annotating quality training examples requires real effort.
Unrealistic expectations: AI won’t instantly handle every format or edge case; model retraining and fine-tuning take time.
Security risks: Commercial proposals often contain confidential data. Proper encryption, role-based access, and compliance with data policies are non-negotiable.
Hidden costs: Beyond development and deployment, ongoing maintenance and training must be factored into ROI calculations. Data preparation overload: Collecting and annotating quality training examples requires real effort. Data preparation overload Unrealistic expectations: AI won’t instantly handle every format or edge case; model retraining and fine-tuning take time. Unrealistic expectations Security risks: Commercial proposals often contain confidential data. Proper encryption, role-based access, and compliance with data policies are non-negotiable. Security risks Hidden costs: Beyond development and deployment, ongoing maintenance and training must be factored into ROI calculations. Hidden costs Handled correctly, though, the trade-offs are worth it. The return comes in speed, scalability, and better customer experience — not just in reduced labor hours. Conclusion: Company Checklist Before launching automation, companies should review: [ ]Availability of historical proposals (emails, files, forms) for AI training,
[ ]Critical fields for the business (items, prices, deadlines, addresses, special conditions),
[ ]Standardization of templates to accelerate deployment,
[ ]Technical infrastructure for integration (API support, ERP/CRM automation),
[ ]Escalation and error-handling processes for complex cases. [ ]Availability of historical proposals (emails, files, forms) for AI training, [ ] [ ]Critical fields for the business (items, prices, deadlines, addresses, special conditions), [ ] [ ]Standardization of templates to accelerate deployment, [ ] [ ]Technical infrastructure for integration (API support, ERP/CRM automation), [ ] [ ]Escalation and error-handling processes for complex cases. [ ] Addressing these factors creates a strong foundation for successful AI-powered commercial proposal processing. The more precise the preparation, the faster the company benefits from automation.

This story contains new, firsthand information uncovered by the writer.

AI Parsing of Commercial Proposals: How to Accelerate Proposal Processing and Win Clients

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Untitled Story

3 Approaches To Digitizing Newspapers & Magazines

The Noonification: How Often Do NFTs Pass The Howey Test? (1/13/2023)

Darwin's Hybrid Intelligence to Align AI & Human Goals for Startups & VCs

The Noonification: White Man (11/26/2022)

The Noonification: The Metaverse is a Sh*tshow (11/2/2022)

3 Approaches To Digitizing Newspapers & Magazines

The Noonification: How Often Do NFTs Pass The Howey Test? (1/13/2023)

Darwin's Hybrid Intelligence to Align AI & Human Goals for Startups & VCs

The Noonification: White Man (11/26/2022)

The Noonification: The Metaverse is a Sh*tshow (11/2/2022)

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps