One of the most useful applications of NLP technology is information extraction from unstructured texts — contracts, financial documents, healthcare records, etc. — that enables automatic data queries to derive new insights. Traditionally, named entity recognition has been widely used to identify entities inside a text and store the data for advanced querying and filtering. However, if we want to semantically understand the unstructured text, NER alone is not enough since we don’t know how the entities are related to each other. Performing joint NER and relation extraction will open up a whole new way of information retrieval through knowledge graphs where you can navigate across different nodes to discover hidden relationships. Therefore, performing these tasks jointly will be beneficial.
Building on my previous article where we fine-tuned a BERT model for NER using spaCy3, we will now add relation extraction to the pipeline using the new Thinc library from spaCy. We train the relation extraction model following the steps outlined in spaCy’s documentation. We will compare the performance of the relation classifier using transformers and tok2vec algorithms. Finally, we will test the model on a job description found online.
At its core, the relation extraction model is a classifier that predicts a relation r for a given pair of entities {e1, e2}. In the case of transformers, this classifier is added on top of the output hidden states. For more information about relation extraction, please read this excellent article outlining the theory of the fine-tuning transformer model for relation classification. The pre-trained model that we are going to fine-tune is the roberta-base model, but you can use any pre-trained model available in huggingface library by simply inputting the name in the config file (see below). In this tutorial, we are going to extract the relationship between the two entities {Experience, Skills} as Experience_in and between {Diploma, Diploma_major} as Degree_in. The goal is to extract the years of experience required in specific skills and the diploma major associated with the required diploma. You can, of course, train your own relation classifier for your own use cases such as finding the cause/effect of symptoms in health records or company acquisitions in financial documents. The possibilities are limitless… In this tutorial, we will only cover the entity relation extraction part. For fine-tuning BERT NER using spaCy 3, please refer to my previous article.
As in my previous article, we use the UBIAI text annotation tool to perform the joint entity and relation annotation because of its versatile interface that allows us to switch between entity and relation annotation easily (see below):
For this tutorial, I have only annotated around 100 documents containing entities and relations. For production, we will certainly need more annotated data.
Before we train the model, we need to convert our annotated data to a binary spacy file. We first split the annotation generated from UBIAI into training/dev/test and save them separately. We modify the code that is provided in spaCy’s tutorial repo to create the binary file for our own annotation (conversion code). We repeat this step for the training, dev, and test dataset to generate three binary spacy files (files available in GitHub).
For training, we will provide the entities from our golden corpus and train the classifier on these entities.
!nvidia-smi
!pip install -U spacy-nightly --pre
!pip install -U pip setuptools wheel !python -m spacy project clone tutorials/rel_component
!python -m spacy download en_core_web_trf !pip install -U spacy transformers
train_file: "data/relations_training.spacy"
dev_file: "data/relations_dev.spacy"
test_file: "data/relations_test.spacy"
[components.transformer.model]
@architectures = "spacy-transformers.TransformerModel.v1"
name = "roberta-base" # Transformer model from huggingface
tokenizer_config = {"use_fast": true}
[components.relation_extractor.model.create_instance_tensor.get_instances]
@misc = "rel_instance_generator.v1"
max_length = 20
We are finally ready to train and evaluate the relation extraction model; just run the commands below:
!spacy project run train_gpu # command to train train transformers
!spacy project run evaluate # command to evaluate on test dataset
You should start seeing the P, R, and F scores start getting updated:
After the model is done training, the evaluation on the test data set will immediately start and display the predicted versus golden labels. The model will be saved in a folder named “training,” along with the scores of our model. To train the non-transformer model tok2vec, run the following command instead: !spacy project run train_cpu # command to train train tok2vec !spacy project run evaluate
We can compare the performance of the two models:
#Transformer model
"performance":{ "rel_micro_p":0.8476190476, "rel_micro_r":0.9468085106, "rel_micro_f":0.8944723618, }
#Tok2vec model
"performance":{ "rel_micro_p":0.8604651163, "rel_micro_r":0.7872340426, "rel_micro_f":0.8222222222, }
The transformer-based model’s precision and recall scores are significantly better than tok2vec and demonstrate the usefulness of transformers when dealing with a low amount of annotated data.
Assuming that we have already trained a transformer NER model as in my previous post, we will extract entities from a job description found online (that was not part of the training nor the dev set) and feed them to the relation extraction model to classify the relationship. Install spacy transformers and transformer pipeline Load the NER model and extract entities:
import spacy
nlp = spacy.load("NER Model Repo/model-best") Text=['''2+ years of non-internship professional software development experience Programming experience with at least one modern language such as Java, C++, or C# including object-oriented design. 1+ years of experience contributing to the architecture and design (architecture, design patterns, reliability and scaling) of new and current systems. Bachelor / MS Degree in Computer Science. Preferably a PhD in data science. 8+ years of professional experience in software development. 2+ years of experience in project management. Experience in mentoring junior software engineers to improve their skills, and make them more effective, product software engineers. Experience in data structures, algorithm design, complexity analysis, object-oriented design. 3+ years experience in at least one modern programming language such as Java, Scala, Python, C++, C# Experience in professional software engineering practices & best practices for the full software development life cycle, including coding standards, code reviews, source control management, build processes, testing, and operations Experience in communicating with users, other technical teams, and management to collect requirements, describe software product features, and technical designs. Experience with building complex software systems that have been successfully delivered to customers Proven ability to take a project from scoping requirements through actual launch of the project, with experience in the subsequent operation of the system in production''']
for doc in nlp.pipe(text, disable=["tagger"]):
print(f"spans: {[(e.start, e.text, e.label_) for e in doc.ents]}")
spans: [(0, '2+ years', 'EXPERIENCE'), (7, 'professional software development', 'SKILLS'), (12, 'Programming', 'SKILLS'), (22, 'Java', 'SKILLS'), (24, 'C++', 'SKILLS'), (27, 'C#', 'SKILLS'), (30, 'object-oriented design', 'SKILLS'), (36, '1+ years', 'EXPERIENCE'), (41, 'contributing to the', 'SKILLS'), (46, 'design', 'SKILLS'), (48, 'architecture', 'SKILLS'), (50, 'design patterns', 'SKILLS'), (55, 'scaling', 'SKILLS'), (60, 'current systems', 'SKILLS'), (64, 'Bachelor', 'DIPLOMA'), (68, 'Computer Science', 'DIPLOMA_MAJOR'), (75, '8+ years', 'EXPERIENCE'), (82, 'software development', 'SKILLS'), (88, 'mentoring junior software engineers', 'SKILLS'), (103, 'product software engineers', 'SKILLS'), (110, 'data structures', 'SKILLS'), (113, 'algorithm design', 'SKILLS'), (116, 'complexity analysis', 'SKILLS'), (119, 'object-oriented design', 'SKILLS'), (135, 'Java', 'SKILLS'), (137, 'Scala', 'SKILLS'), (139, 'Python', 'SKILLS'), (141, 'C++', 'SKILLS'), (143, 'C#', 'SKILLS'), (148, 'professional software engineering', 'SKILLS'), (151, 'practices', 'SKILLS'), (153, 'best practices', 'SKILLS'), (158, 'software development', 'SKILLS'), (164, 'coding', 'SKILLS'), (167, 'code reviews', 'SKILLS'), (170, 'source control management', 'SKILLS'), (174, 'build processes', 'SKILLS'), (177, 'testing', 'SKILLS'), (180, 'operations', 'SKILLS'), (184, 'communicating', 'SKILLS'), (193, 'management', 'SKILLS'), (199, 'software product', 'SKILLS'), (204, 'technical designs', 'SKILLS'), (210, 'building complex software systems', 'SKILLS'), (229, 'scoping requirements', 'SKILLS')]
import random
import typer from pathlib
import Path
import spacy from spacy.tokens
import DocBin, Doc from spacy.training.example
import Example from rel_pipe import make_relation_extractor, score_relations from rel_model import create_relation_model, create_classification_layer, create_instances, create_tensors
#We load the relation extraction (REL) model
nlp2 = spacy.load("training/model-best")
#We take the entities generated from the NER pipeline and input them to the REL pipeline
for name, proc in nlp2.pipeline: doc = proc(doc)
#Here, we split the paragraph into sentences and apply the relation extraction for each pair of entities found in each sentence.
for value, rel_dict in doc._.rel.items():
for sent in doc.sents:
for e in sent.ents:
for b in sent.ents:
if e.start == value[0] and b.start == value[1]:
if rel_dict['EXPERIENCE_IN'] >=0.9 :
print(f" entities: {e.text, b.text} --> predicted relation: {rel_dict}")
Here we display all the entities having a relationship Experience_in with a confidence score higher than 90%:
"entities":("2+ years", "professional software development"") --> predicted relation": {"DEGREE_IN":1.2778723e-07,"EXPERIENCE_IN":0.9694631} "entities":"(""1+ years", "contributing to the"") --> predicted relation": {"DEGREE_IN":1.4581254e-07,"EXPERIENCE_IN":0.9205434} "entities":"(""1+ years","design"") --> predicted relation": {"DEGREE_IN":1.8895419e-07,"EXPERIENCE_IN":0.94121873} "entities":"(""1+ years","architecture"") --> predicted relation": {"DEGREE_IN":1.9635708e-07,"EXPERIENCE_IN":0.9399484} "entities":"(""1+ years","design patterns"") --> predicted relation": {"DEGREE_IN":1.9823732e-07,"EXPERIENCE_IN":0.9423302} "entities":"(""1+ years", "scaling"") --> predicted relation": {"DEGREE_IN":1.892173e-07,"EXPERIENCE_IN":0.96628445} entities: ('2+ years', 'project management') --> predicted relation: {'DEGREE_IN': 5.175297e-07, 'EXPERIENCE_IN': 0.9911635} "entities":"(""8+ years","software development"") --> predicted relation": {"DEGREE_IN":4.914319e-08,"EXPERIENCE_IN":0.994812} "entities":"(""3+ years","Java"") --> predicted relation": {"DEGREE_IN":9.288566e-08,"EXPERIENCE_IN":0.99975795} "entities":"(""3+ years","Scala"") --> predicted relation": {"DEGREE_IN":2.8477e-07,"EXPERIENCE_IN":0.99982494} "entities":"(""3+ years","Python"") --> predicted relation": {"DEGREE_IN":3.3149718e-07,"EXPERIENCE_IN":0.9998517} "entities":"(""3+ years","C++"") --> predicted relation": {"DEGREE_IN":2.2569053e-07,"EXPERIENCE_IN":0.99986637}
Remarkably, we were able to extract almost all the years of experience along with their respective skills correctly with no false positives or negatives!
Let’s look at the entities having relationship Degree_in:
entities: ('Bachelor / MS', 'Computer Science') --> predicted relation: {'DEGREE_IN': 0.9943974, 'EXPERIENCE_IN':1.8361954e-09} entities: ('PhD', 'data science') --> predicted relation: {'DEGREE_IN': 0.98883855, 'EXPERIENCE_IN': 5.2092592e-09}
Again, we successfully extracted all the relationships between diploma and diploma major! This again demonstrates how easy it is to fine-tune transformer models to your own domain-specific case with a low amount of annotated data, whether it is for NER or relation extraction. With only a hundred annotated documents, we were able to train a relation classifier with good performance. Furthermore, we can use this initial model to auto-annotate hundreds more of unlabeled data with minimal correction. This can significantly speed up the annotation process and improve model performance.
Transformers have truly transformed the domain of NLP, and I am particularly excited about their application in information extraction. I would like to give a shoutout to explosion AI(spaCy developers) and huggingface for providing open-source solutions that facilitate the adoption of transformers. If you need data annotation for your project, don’t hesitate to try out the UBIAI annotation tool. We provide numerous programmable labeling solutions (such as ML auto-annotation, regular expressions, dictionaries, etc.) to minimize hand annotation. Lastly, check out this article to learn how to leverage the NER and relation extraction models to build knowledge graphs and extract new insights. If you have any comments, please email at [email protected]! Follow us on Twitter @UBIAI5.
Also published here.