Async/await in C# is a framework used for writing asynchronous C# code that is both readable and maintainable. These tips will help you to integrate async/await programming more effectively in the # projects:
Use ValueTask instead of Task for asynchronous methods that often complete synchronously, reducing the allocation overhead.
public async ValueTask<int> GetResultAsync()
{
if (cachedResult != null)
return cachedResult;
int result = await ComputeResultAsync();
cachedResult = result;
return result;
}
Use ConfigureAwait(false) in the library code to avoid deadlocks by not capturing the synchronization context.
public async Task SomeLibraryMethodAsync()
{
await SomeAsyncOperation().ConfigureAwait(false);
}
Prefer async Task over async void except for event handlers, as async void can lead to unhandled exceptions and is harder to test.
public async Task EventHandlerAsync(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
await PerformOperationAsync();
}
For asynchronous cleanup, implement IAsyncDisposable and use await to ensure resources are released properly.
public async ValueTask DisposeAsync()
{
await DisposeAsyncCore();
}
private async ValueTask DisposeAsyncCore()
{
if (resource != null)
{
await resource.DisposeAsync();
}
}
Use Task.WhenAll for running multiple tasks in parallel and waiting for all to complete, which is more efficient than awaiting each task sequentially
public async Task ProcessTasksAsync()
{
Task task1 = DoTask1Async();
Task task2 = DoTask2Async();
await Task.WhenAll(task1, task2);
}
Support cancellation in asynchronous methods using CancellationToken.
public async Task DoOperationAsync(CancellationToken cancellationToken)
{
await LongRunningOperationAsync(cancellationToken);
cancellationToken.ThrowIfCancellationRequested();
}
For performance-critical code, consider structuring your async methods to minimize the creation of state machines by separating synchronous and asynchronous paths.
public async Task<int> FastPathAsync()
{
if (TryGetCachedResult(out int result))
{
return result;
}
return await ComputeResultAsync();
}
Avoid blocking on async code with .Result or .Wait(). Instead, use asynchronous waiting through the stack.
public async Task WrapperMethodAsync()
{
int result = await GetResultAsync();
}
In simple passthrough scenarios or when returning a task directly, you can elide the async and await keywords for slightly improved performance.
public Task<int> GetResultAsync() => ComputeResultAsync();
For advanced scenarios, like limiting concurrency or capturing synchronization contexts, consider implementing a custom TaskScheduler.
public sealed class LimitedConcurrencyLevelTaskScheduler : TaskScheduler
{
// Implement the scheduler logic here.
}
Leverage asynchronous streams with IAsyncEnumerable<T> for processing sequences of data asynchronously, introduced in C# 8.0.
public async IAsyncEnumerable<int> GetNumbersAsync()
{
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
{
await Task.Delay(100); // Simulate async work
yield return i;
}
}
Async lambdas can introduce overhead. In performance-critical paths, consider refactoring them into separate async methods.
// Before optimization
Func<Task> asyncLambda = async () => await DoWorkAsync();
// After optimization
public async Task DoWorkMethodAsync()
{
await DoWorkAsync();
}
SemaphoreSlim can be used for async coordination, such as limiting access to a resource in a thread-safe manner.
private readonly SemaphoreSlim semaphore = new SemaphoreSlim(1, 1);
public async Task UseResourceAsync()
{
await semaphore.WaitAsync();
try
{
// Access the resource
}
finally
{
semaphore.Release();
}
}
Use await Task.Yield() in UI applications to ensure the UI remains responsive by allowing other operations to process.
public async Task LoadDataAsync()
{
await Task.Yield(); // Return control to the UI thread
// Load data here
}
Use Lazy<Task<T>> for asynchronous lazy initialization, ensuring the initialization logic runs only once and is thread-safe.
private readonly Lazy<Task<MyObject>> lazyObject = new Lazy<Task<MyObject>>(async () =>
{
return await InitializeAsync();
});
public async Task<MyObject> GetObjectAsync() => await lazyObject.Value;
Be cautious when combining async methods with LINQ queries; consider using asynchronous streams or explicitly unwrapping tasks when necessary.
public async Task<IEnumerable<int>> ProcessDataAsync()
{
var data = await GetDataAsync(); // Assume this returns Task<List<int>>
return data.Where(x => x > 10);
}
Handle errors gracefully in asynchronous streams by encapsulating the yielding loop in a try-catch block.
public async IAsyncEnumerable<int> GetNumbersWithErrorsAsync()
{
try
{
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
{
if (i == 5) throw new InvalidOperationException("Test error");
yield return i;
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
// Handle or log the error
}
}
Utilize Parallel.ForEachAsync in .NET 6 and later for running asynchronous operations in parallel, providing a more efficient way to handle CPU-bound and I/O-bound operations concurrently.
await Parallel.ForEachAsync(data, async (item, cancellationToken) =>
{
await ProcessItemAsync(item, cancellationToken);
});
In performance-critical sections, minimize the use of async/await. Instead, consider using Task.ContinueWith with caution or redesigning the workflow to reduce asynchronous calls.
Task<int> task = ComputeAsync();
task.ContinueWith(t => Process(t.Result));
Utilize the async entry point for console applications introduced in C# 7.1 to simplify initialization code.
public static async Task Main(string[] args)
{
await StartApplicationAsync();
}
For loops performing asynchronous operations, consider batching or parallelizing tasks to improve throughput.
var tasks = new List<Task>();
for (int i = 0; i < items.Length; i++)
{
tasks.Add(ProcessItemAsync(items[i]));
}
await Task.WhenAll(tasks);
Thank you for being a part of the C# community! Before you leave:
Follow us: Youtube | X | LinkedIn | Dev.to Visit our other platforms: GitHub More content at C# Programming
Also published here.