Communications are a big piece for users going , but Apple cannot solve this by themselves phone-less , and, , adding independent connectivity may be a key element to turn the device in the center of a new ecosystem of apps beyond the iPhone. that for this to happen some sort of calling should be supported too, so that it provides enough value for people to go “phone-less” with it, but that this initially would have to be based on FaceTime audio: All evidence points to Apple announcing an LTE Apple Watch this week as I discussed in a previous post I also mentioned The out of the box experience for Apple Watch will be limited to iMessage and FaceTime audio, but . we can also expect some operators to extend their current multi-device offerings to also include Apple Watch calls and texts , confirming the expectation that regular calls will not work initially on the cellular-enabled Watch: New articles are reflecting this Apple The watch could, however, support VoIP services like FaceTime and Skype, as FaceTime audio calling is already supported on current Apple Watch models. Given that the current WatchOS SDKs and APIs don’t support VoIP apps, I expect that for launch only FaceTime audio will be available. But it is also possible that Apple is working with selected partners to provide them early access to some capabilities so that additional apps are ready for launch. . Don’t expect WhatsApp there, though But on the front of “regular calls”, are wondering why is Apple not addressing this, given that this may be a relevant and useful feature: some other posts it’s hard to imagine Cook testing the device for over two years and not lobbying to add a powerful feature like the ability to make phone calls. The answer is that almost in a one-to-one basis. Apple cannot fix this without working with the telecommunication operators, Why you cannot get calls on an Apple Watch The main argument for this is that I am not going to go over the details here, as , but an operator that has deployed a 4G (LTE) network must also do additional work to support voice calls on it. It requires installing and integrating specific systems to support , something most operators are still not doing. Currently only a fraction of 4G operators support VoLTE, with last year’s numbers showing only 1 out of 5 doing it. the LTE network does not support regular voice calls. I already covered this topic in a previous article the VoLTE (Voice over LTE) service But to support calls in the Apple Watch with the right experience, that is, using the same phone number that you already have in your iPhone, not only is needed, but also “multi device” support from the operator. VoLTE This means your operator needs some other systems in its network so that calls that are made with your phone or your Watch (or other devices) show under your same id (your phone number) and take minutes from your same plan, and also that calls coming to your number can ring simultaneously in both devices (or more). To manage all of this, Apple provides a framework for calls in multiple Apple devices with their “ ”. This allows calls made to your existing number to ring in your iPad, Mac or even Apple Watch over Wi-Fi, even if your phone is off. But this service is not provided by Apple alone: it requires support and integration with the operators, which in turn are marketing the feature in different ways, like AT&T using the brand. Wi-Fi Calling on supported iCloud-connected devices NumberSync Notice that this feature is different from what Apple Calls “ ”, which allows calls “ ”. This would not work for the LTE Watch if the point is to be able to go phone-less, right? That’s why this is presented this way in the iPhone settings: Continuity when your devices are near each other Notice the “ ”? even when your iPhone is not nearby Extending this capability to work over LTE for the Apple Watch (since it already works in Wi-Fi) would be fairly simple, and to simplify set-up I expect that Apple will require supporting this framework to also enable voice calls over LTE in the Apple Watch. But while , currently few other countries support it ( , , and ). This reflects that this is not something simple to implement, and that it is unlikely new operators will have this for this week’s launch. multi-device for Apple is available in the big carriers in the US a couple of operators in Asia only in Puerto Rico for Latin America no operator in Europe Why some operators that *could* support them, may not do it anyway While using the same Wi-Fi calling solution over LTE would work in the Apple Watch, this is not the “canonical” approach for carriers. The was defined specifically so that phones could get the calling service over a “third party” connectivity. That is a connectivity not (necessarily) provided by the operator itself, and because of that it involves some systems to secure that access that are not needed when using the LTE network. Wi-Fi calling technology solution This may sound like using the Wi-Fi Calling capability in an LTE data access would be more complex, but it actually is the other way round: the Wi-Fi calling solution is already working and it would be transparent to consider LTE just “another Wi-Fi access”, while the “good” solution, would require additional work in VoTLE for the multi-device network service and identity management aspects. So if technical teams in the operators focus on providing the “right” model for VoLTE calls on the Apple Watch, it will be more complex (both in time and in resources) than just using what they already have in place for Wi-Fi Calling. On top of that, there may be concerns about dropped calls, as LTE coverage is usually ( ) worse than the 3G/2G one. Regular VoLTE support in phones allows handover of calls between the 4G and 3G/2G signals, but in an Apple Watch with just 4G these calls would just drop if a user exits the LTE signal (calls may continue into Wi-Fi, but that is an unlikely scenario). but not always I personally consider that a call that may drop is better than no call at all, but in some departments in telco operators, where KPIs around dropped calls still exist, they would not agree with me. So both dimensions together: Not being the “standard” approach Quality issues from dropped calls may prevent the service in some operators. Could Apple do something else? Of course, to ensure wider support by operators, Apple could add 3G and 2G support also in the Apple Watch. But I believe they won’t because: It would make the solution a lot more complex for the Apple Watch technology stack (both hardware and software), and basically just to enable phone calls (which is important, but not to the point to impact the product launch). It would not really simplify the solution for carriers, as they would still need the VoLTE support for 4G, plus other solutions for supporting 3G/2G calls in that line with the same identity. , and while they would “work” they would provide a worse experience (decoupled from Apple’s framework, handover between devices and duplicated notifications would be harder to address), and make the solution much more complicated for the telco itself to implement. Even if the operators would want to go this route, Apple probably doesn’t even want to get into that discussion. Traditional MultiSIM services do this It would be looking into the past, and I believe, for the Watch, Apple is more focused in the future. Yes, supporting 3G would allow them to launch the cellular Watch in more markets, as LTE coverage in many countries (particularly Latin America or Africa) is still relatively small and centered on big cities. But for the casual phone-less usage that the Watch is aiming for, that is probably not critical. In fact, since I believe the Watch will not have a physical SIM but an eSIM, the provisioning process (the steps the users will have to follow to associate the Watch LTE line with their main iPhone line) will require also additional integrations with the operator’s systems, probably . And since the line will not be independent but associated with a main iPhone one, I also expect it to be a relatively cheap additional plan for customers, which fits existing approaches to family and multi-device plans. similar to how Apple SIMs work today on the LTE iPads This limits the number of operators that are suitable and which Apple will consider to do the integration efforts with, which will mean that only a few ones will support the LTE Apple Watch at launch. I believe . Maybe even just one, and have it as an exclusive launch, just like the original iPhone was at first (with AT&T) or the Wi-Fi Calling functionality was (with T Mobile). the LTE Apple Watch will only be available in the US in 2017, and only with a few carriers Given the supply issues that Apple is recently facing with new technology efforts, , limiting the target market can help them cope with demand (and generate additional hype due to scarcity). And this will also win time for all the operators to keep expanding their 4G coverage, so that 3G support becomes increasingly less important. as shown with their AirPods constraints What I expect So with all these considerations, let’s risk a small prediction here, and see if I’m right later this week: Yes, k [odds: very high] there will be an LTE Apple Watch announced this wee [odds: high] It will only be available in the USA this year [odds: very high] It will not support regular phone calls (or SMS) on most carriers [odds: medium] But they will have some selected operator(s) that will offer calls too If it is just one operator, it will be AT&T, as associating it to NumberSync makes the message to the market simpler, they are the ones (by contrast other carriers offer no information or s , without providing more details), and because the event will have some look back to the 10th anniversary of the original iPhone launch (with the new iPhone using the roman numeral 10: !) it may be nice to go back to the partner they had in the original launch. [odds: low/pure unbased guess] currently providing the most information about making calls with Apple Watch over Wi-Fi imply mention the Watch in a device list iPhone X So overall, only a fraction of Apple Watch customers will be able to get the LTE version, and even fewer of those will be able to use it for calling. Then it will be up to operators to work with Apple to enable these capabilities (LTE Watch eSIM support and calling) in their networks, but unless they do this fast this will become increasingly irrelevant, as other VoIP applications (Skype, Telegram, WhatsApp…) will provide voice first , and the demand for operator voice will go down over time. So in the end Apple did launch an LTE Apple Watch, and it did have calls, and only some operators offer it… but there are some surprises there. to see how that impacts the ability for creating a new ecosystem. UPDATE: Take a look at my new article
