ForkJoinPool is a special-purpose ExecutorService in Java designed for parallelizing divide-and-conquer algorithms. It is part of the java.util.concurrent package introduced in Java 7. The main idea behind ForkJoinPool is to efficiently utilize available CPU cores by recursively splitting tasks into smaller subtasks and executing them in parallel. The common pool of ForkJoinPool threads are implicitly used in Java applications whenever ForkJoinTasks are submitted for execution without explicitly specifying a custom ForkJoinPool instance. Here are some scenarios in which the common pool threads are implicitly utilized: Parallel Stream Operations: When using parallel stream operations in Java 8 or later, such as parallel() or parallelStream(), the underlying implementation may utilize the common pool threads for parallel execution of stream operations. For example:
javaCopy codeList<Integer> numbers = Arrays.asList(1, 2, 3, 4, 5);
int sum = numbers.parallelStream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).sum();




RecursiveTask and RecursiveAction: If you create instances of RecursiveTask or RecursiveAction and invoke their fork() and join() methods, the tasks are typically executed using the common pool threads. For example:
javaCopy codeclass MyRecursiveTask extends RecursiveTask<Integer> {
    @Override
    protected Integer compute() {
        // Task logic here
    }
}
MyRecursiveTask task = new MyRecursiveTask();
int result = ForkJoinPool.commonPool().invoke(task);




Task Execution by ForkJoinPool: Any ForkJoinTasks submitted to the ForkJoinPool using methods like invoke(), submit(), or execute() without specifying a custom pool instance will be executed using the common pool threads.


Parallel Array Operations: Operations on parallel arrays using Arrays.parallelSetAll(), Arrays.parallelSort(), etc., may utilize the common pool threads for parallel processing.


CompletableFuture: Operations on CompletableFuture, especially those involving asynchronous computations and combining results using methods like thenCombine() or thenApplyAsync(), may leverage the common pool threads for execution. In all these scenarios, the common pool threads are implicitly used by the Java runtime to execute tasks in parallel, taking advantage of multi-core processors and maximizing CPU utilization. Generally, it’s not advisable to use ForkJoinPool threads directly in the methods of CompletableFuture. Here's why: Reasons to Avoid Direct Usage: Conflicting Execution Models: CompletableFuture uses its own asynchronous execution mechanism, often relying on a cached thread pool or a custom executor you provide. Bypassing this mechanism and introducing ForkJoinPool threads can lead to unexpected behavior and potential thread pool management issues.
Limited Control: Using thenAsync allows CompletableFuture to manage thread pool utilization based on the workload. Direct ForkJoinPool usage might not align with this management strategy.
Blocking: ForkJoinPool is optimized for CPU-bound tasks with coarse-grained parallelism. Blocking operations within thenAsync tasks can hinder the pool's efficiency. Recommended Approach: Leverage the internal asynchronous execution mechanism of CompletableFuture. You can configure a custom executor for CompletableFuture if you have specific thread pool requirements, but it's usually not necessary for basic asynchronous tasks.
If you have CPU-bound tasks suitable for ForkJoinPool, consider processing them before using CompletableFuture. Utilize CompletableFuture for the asynchronous chaining of these pre-processed results. In summary, exercise caution while using CompletableFuture methods without passing custom executor service as it might create some unexpected behavior. ForkJoinPool is a special-purpose ExecutorService in Java designed for parallelizing divide-and-conquer algorithms. It is part of the java.util.concurrent package introduced in Java 7 . The main idea behind ForkJoinPool is to efficiently utilize available CPU cores by recursively splitting tasks into smaller subtasks and executing them in parallel. ForkJoinPool ExecutorService java.util.concurrent Java 7 ForkJoinPool The common pool of ForkJoinPool threads are implicitly used in Java applications whenever ForkJoinTasks are submitted for execution without explicitly specifying a custom ForkJoinPool instance. Here are some scenarios in which the common pool threads are implicitly utilized: ForkJoinPool ForkJoinPool Parallel Stream Operations: When using parallel stream operations in Java 8 or later, such as parallel() or parallelStream(), the underlying implementation may utilize the common pool threads for parallel execution of stream operations. For example:
javaCopy codeList<Integer> numbers = Arrays.asList(1, 2, 3, 4, 5);
int sum = numbers.parallelStream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).sum(); RecursiveTask and RecursiveAction: If you create instances of RecursiveTask or RecursiveAction and invoke their fork() and join() methods, the tasks are typically executed using the common pool threads. For example:
javaCopy codeclass MyRecursiveTask extends RecursiveTask<Integer> {
    @Override
    protected Integer compute() {
        // Task logic here
    }
}
MyRecursiveTask task = new MyRecursiveTask();
int result = ForkJoinPool.commonPool().invoke(task); Task Execution by ForkJoinPool: Any ForkJoinTasks submitted to the ForkJoinPool using methods like invoke(), submit(), or execute() without specifying a custom pool instance will be executed using the common pool threads. Parallel Array Operations: Operations on parallel arrays using Arrays.parallelSetAll(), Arrays.parallelSort(), etc., may utilize the common pool threads for parallel processing. CompletableFuture: Operations on CompletableFuture, especially those involving asynchronous computations and combining results using methods like thenCombine() or thenApplyAsync(), may leverage the common pool threads for execution. Parallel Stream Operations: When using parallel stream operations in Java 8 or later, such as parallel() or parallelStream(), the underlying implementation may utilize the common pool threads for parallel execution of stream operations. For example: javaCopy codeList<Integer> numbers = Arrays.asList(1, 2, 3, 4, 5);
int sum = numbers.parallelStream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).sum(); Parallel Stream Operations : When using parallel stream operations in Java 8 or later, such as parallel() or parallelStream() , the underlying implementation may utilize the common pool threads for parallel execution of stream operations. For example: Parallel Stream Operations parallel() parallelStream() javaCopy codeList<Integer> numbers = Arrays.asList(1, 2, 3, 4, 5);
int sum = numbers.parallelStream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).sum(); javaCopy codeList<Integer> numbers = Arrays.asList(1, 2, 3, 4, 5);
int sum = numbers.parallelStream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).sum(); RecursiveTask and RecursiveAction: If you create instances of RecursiveTask or RecursiveAction and invoke their fork() and join() methods, the tasks are typically executed using the common pool threads. For example: javaCopy codeclass MyRecursiveTask extends RecursiveTask<Integer> {
    @Override
    protected Integer compute() {
        // Task logic here
    }
}
MyRecursiveTask task = new MyRecursiveTask();
int result = ForkJoinPool.commonPool().invoke(task); RecursiveTask and RecursiveAction : If you create instances of RecursiveTask or RecursiveAction and invoke their fork() and join() methods, the tasks are typically executed using the common pool threads. For example: RecursiveTask and RecursiveAction RecursiveTask RecursiveAction fork() join() javaCopy codeclass MyRecursiveTask extends RecursiveTask<Integer> {
    @Override
    protected Integer compute() {
        // Task logic here
    }
}
MyRecursiveTask task = new MyRecursiveTask();
int result = ForkJoinPool.commonPool().invoke(task); javaCopy codeclass MyRecursiveTask extends RecursiveTask<Integer> {
    @Override
    protected Integer compute() {
        // Task logic here
    }
}
MyRecursiveTask task = new MyRecursiveTask();
int result = ForkJoinPool.commonPool().invoke(task); Task Execution by ForkJoinPool: Any ForkJoinTasks submitted to the ForkJoinPool using methods like invoke(), submit(), or execute() without specifying a custom pool instance will be executed using the common pool threads. Task Execution by ForkJoinPool : Any ForkJoinTasks submitted to the ForkJoinPool using methods like invoke() , submit() , or execute() without specifying a custom pool instance will be executed using the common pool threads. Task Execution by ForkJoinPool ForkJoinPool invoke() submit() execute() Parallel Array Operations: Operations on parallel arrays using Arrays.parallelSetAll(), Arrays.parallelSort(), etc., may utilize the common pool threads for parallel processing. Parallel Array Operations : Operations on parallel arrays using Arrays.parallelSetAll() , Arrays.parallelSort() , etc., may utilize the common pool threads for parallel processing. Parallel Array Operations Arrays.parallelSetAll() Arrays.parallelSort() CompletableFuture: Operations on CompletableFuture, especially those involving asynchronous computations and combining results using methods like thenCombine() or thenApplyAsync(), may leverage the common pool threads for execution. CompletableFuture : Operations on CompletableFuture , especially those involving asynchronous computations and combining results using methods like thenCombine() or thenApplyAsync() , may leverage the common pool threads for execution. CompletableFuture CompletableFuture thenCombine() thenApplyAsync() In all these scenarios, the common pool threads are implicitly used by the Java runtime to execute tasks in parallel, taking advantage of multi-core processors and maximizing CPU utilization. Generally, it’s not advisable to use ForkJoinPool threads directly in the methods of CompletableFuture . Here's why: ForkJoinPool CompletableFuture Reasons to Avoid Direct Usage: Reasons to Avoid Direct Usage: Conflicting Execution Models: CompletableFuture uses its own asynchronous execution mechanism, often relying on a cached thread pool or a custom executor you provide. Bypassing this mechanism and introducing ForkJoinPool threads can lead to unexpected behavior and potential thread pool management issues. Limited Control: Using thenAsync allows CompletableFuture to manage thread pool utilization based on the workload. Direct ForkJoinPool usage might not align with this management strategy. Blocking: ForkJoinPool is optimized for CPU-bound tasks with coarse-grained parallelism. Blocking operations within thenAsync tasks can hinder the pool's efficiency. Conflicting Execution Models: CompletableFuture uses its own asynchronous execution mechanism, often relying on a cached thread pool or a custom executor you provide. Bypassing this mechanism and introducing ForkJoinPool threads can lead to unexpected behavior and potential thread pool management issues. Conflicting Execution Models: CompletableFuture ForkJoinPool Limited Control: Using thenAsync allows CompletableFuture to manage thread pool utilization based on the workload. Direct ForkJoinPool usage might not align with this management strategy. Limited Control: thenAsync CompletableFuture ForkJoinPool Blocking: ForkJoinPool is optimized for CPU-bound tasks with coarse-grained parallelism. Blocking operations within thenAsync tasks can hinder the pool's efficiency. Blocking: ForkJoinPool thenAsync Recommended Approach: Recommended Approach: Leverage the internal asynchronous execution mechanism of CompletableFuture. You can configure a custom executor for CompletableFuture if you have specific thread pool requirements, but it's usually not necessary for basic asynchronous tasks. If you have CPU-bound tasks suitable for ForkJoinPool, consider processing them before using CompletableFuture. Utilize CompletableFuture for the asynchronous chaining of these pre-processed results. Leverage the internal asynchronous execution mechanism of CompletableFuture . You can configure a custom executor for CompletableFuture if you have specific thread pool requirements, but it's usually not necessary for basic asynchronous tasks. CompletableFuture CompletableFuture If you have CPU-bound tasks suitable for ForkJoinPool , consider processing them before using CompletableFuture . Utilize CompletableFuture for the asynchronous chaining of these pre-processed results. ForkJoinPool CompletableFuture CompletableFuture In summary, exercise caution while using CompletableFuture methods without passing custom executor service as it might create some unexpected behavior.

Walkthroughs, tutorials, guides, and tips. This story will teach you how to do something new or how to do something better.

Too Long; Didn't Read

In your car, at home, or at work — Bosch technology shapes many areas of life.

When is Common ForkJoinPool Used Internally by JVM?

Too Long; Didn't Read

Prasanna G

STORY’S CREDIBILITY

Guide

About Author

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN...

When is Common ForkJoinPool Used Internally by JVM?

Too Long; Didn't Read

Prasanna G

STORY’S CREDIBILITY

Guide

About Author

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN...

RELATED STORIES