There's a specific kind of silence that comes after a pivot announcement. The Figma files don't delete themselves. The components are still there, organized in the same folder structure you spent weeks perfecting. The design system still loads. Everything looks exactly like it did yesterday. But you know, with quiet certainty, that most of it isn't going where you thought it was going. That silence has been my companion for most of 2023. Four Years of Product Work I joined VALK in November 2019 as the only designer. No design system, no component library, no brand standards beyond a logo and a color. I built everything from scratch, the tokenization platform interfaces, deal management flows, investor dashboards, cap table tools. Every modal, every empty state, every error message. I made the decisions about spacing scales and typography, and when to use a table versus a card layout. It was genuinely mine in a way that product work rarely is. When you're the sole designer at a company for four years, you develop a strange relationship with the product. You know where every skeleton is buried. You remember why that particular dropdown works the way it does, even though it looks weird, because of a compliance requirement that came in last-minute from a specific client. You carry four years of context in your head that isn't documented anywhere. That's a lot to hold. The Pivot I'm not going to pretend I didn't see it coming. The signals were there throughout 2023, conversations about market positioning, about where institutional blockchain was heading, about what VALK needed to become to stay relevant. Companies at this stage either find a bigger wedge or they stall. I understood the logic. The decision was to move toward DatAI Network, a significant reposition toward on-chain data infrastructure. It's a real strategic bet, not a vanity rebrand. I can see why the leadership made it. But here's what nobody really talks about: what happens to the designer when this happens? The brand for DatAI came from an external design agency. Which is fine, that's often the right call for a major rebrand. Agencies bring a fresh perspective, they move fast on identity work, and they don't have four years of internal baggage coloring every decision. I understand why you'd go external. But then you hand that brand to the sole internal designer and say: adapt this to everything we need. Becoming a Brand Adapter My job description didn't change. My title didn't change. But the actual work changed substantially. For most of 2023, I spent roughly sixty percent of my time on presentations, slides, pitch decks, social media templates, and one-pagers. The product design work, the interfaces, the flows, the actual UX, became secondary. Sometimes, it felt further back than that. The deck designer trap is something I'd read about in passing, but never thought I would fall into so hard. When I took this role in 2019, I imagined myself deep in interaction problems, thinking about how institutional investors process complex financial data, and how to reduce cognitive load in a cap table view. And I did that work for years. It was the work I cared about. Investor presentations are not that work. Social media graphics are not that work. They require skill, and they require care. I'm not dismissing them, but they're not why I studied design. They're not the reason I spent nights in my early twenties reading about information architecture. Working with someone else's brand guidelines after you've owned the brand for years is its own particular adjustment. The external agency did good work. The visual identity for DatAI is solid. But it's not mine, and adapting it feels like translating. I understand what they were going for, I can execute in their style, but I'm not speaking my own language anymore. There's a small indignity in that. Nothing dramatic. Just a constant low hum of "this isn't quite what I would have done." The emotional reality of watching your product get deprecated. I want to try to describe what it actually feels like because I haven't seen many designers write about this honestly. The VALK tokenization platform that I designed from 2019 to 2022, the one I sweated over, rebuilt the design system for twice, knew every edge case of, that product is not the future of this company. The Merlin DeFi tracker, which I designed and also did some of the frontend work for, is not the future either in its original form. These things still exist in some capacity, but they're not where the investment is going. Intellectually, I know this is just how startups work. Products evolve, strategies shift, things you built get superseded. I've seen it happen at other companies from the outside. Experiencing it from the inside, as the person who made those things, is different. It's a quiet kind of grief. Nobody died. The company is still alive, actually taking a direction that might work out well. But the product I spent four years caring about, the one I could navigate with my eyes closed, the one where I knew exactly why every decision was made, that product is quietly being set aside. You grieve it a little. I think you're supposed to. What helped me recognize this was talking to a friend outside of design who went through something similar when their team's project got cancelled. They said: "The work was real even if the thing doesn't exist anymore." I've been sitting with that. The work was real. The thinking was real. The solutions to real problems were real. The product moving in a different direction doesn't undo four years of craft. I mostly believe that. On good days, I believe it completely. What I'm actually doing with the frustration. The healthy answer would be "channeling it productively." The honest answer is: a mix of that and just feeling it. I've become more rigorous about the work that is still mine. Even if sixty percent of my time is spent on presentations, the forty percent that is product design gets more deliberate attention. When I do get to work on actual interface decisions for DatAI, I'm more conscious of it. I document more carefully. I write down my reasoning in ways I didn't bother to earlier in my career when everything felt self-evident. I've also gotten more honest with myself about what this period means professionally. Four years at one company is a long time, especially in this industry. I've grown enormously here. I understand institutional finance in ways I couldn't have predicted when I was 23 and had never worked in fintech. I can read a cap table, have an actual conversation about tokenization mechanics, and understand compliance constraints intuitively. That knowledge is real, and it's mine regardless of what direction the company takes. But I'm starting to think about what comes next. Not urgently, not with resentment. Just honestly. When a company pivots and the role quietly transforms into something different from what you signed up for, it's a reasonable moment to ask whether this is still the right place to be developing as a designer. I don't have a clear answer yet. But the question is there, and ignoring it would be worse than sitting with it. Getting good at adapting someone else's vision. There is one thing I've had to genuinely learn this year, and I want to give it credit rather than just frame it as frustration. Executing within someone else's brand system, when that system is good, is actually a real skill. The DatAI visual language has a logic to it, and understanding that logic well enough to extend it coherently is not nothing. I've made hundreds of small decisions about how to apply their system to contexts the external agency never anticipated. Data table treatments, mobile breakpoints, slide layouts with very different content densities, loading states, and error conditions. None of that is as satisfying as building the system from scratch. But it's not mindless either. It's a different kind of craft. I've noticed that I'm more opinionated about this kind of work than I expected to be. Even within external guidelines, there's room for judgment calls. What counts as "on brand" in an edge case isn't always specified. Those small judgment calls are where I can still leave fingerprints. Tofu I'm going to end this on something unrelated to design because 2023 deserves to be remembered for more than just the pivot. In early December, we got a Maltese puppy. His name is Tofu. He weighs about five pounds and has the energy of something much larger and the expression of a small emperor who is not fully certain the world is being run correctly. Getting a puppy is objectively chaotic. The sleep disruption, the constant supervision, and the steep learning curve of understanding what he needs and when. My partner Anna and I have had approximately zero chill since he arrived. It is also the best decision of the year. Possibly for several years. There is something clarifying about a small creature who needs you reliably and completely and doesn't care at all about product pivots or brand guidelines or whether the deck you made looks good on a 4K display. Tofu needs a walk, some food, and someone to play with. That's the whole thing. That simplicity, right now, is kind of a gift. I was skeptical of the "get a dog for your mental health" narrative before this. I understand it now. Some kind of conclusion. I don't think I have a tidy takeaway from this year. The honest version is: when your company pivots significantly, and you're the sole designer, you absorb a lot of the disruption in ways that aren't always visible to the rest of the team. Your past work quietly becomes legacy. Your role quietly becomes something different. And you have to figure out, largely on your own, how to feel about that and what to do with it. I'm not bitter about VALK or the pivot. Companies have to make strategic decisions, and this one makes sense. The people I work with are good. The mission, in its new form, is real. But I also think the designer's experience of a company pivot is worth talking about more honestly than it usually is. You don't just update the Figma files and move on. There's context you lose access to, craft that gets deprecated alongside the product, a version of the job that quietly disappears while the title stays the same. You mourn it a little. You adapt. You find where your fingerprints can still land. And sometimes you get a five-pound Maltese puppy who needs a walk right now, actually, and does not care about any of this at all. That helps more than I expected.

Figma

Pivot

AI Products Have Terrible UX: Here's Why

Portfolio

What to Do When Your Design Work Stops Mattering: How to Adapt

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

AI Products Have Terrible UX: Here's Why

What No One Told Me About Being a Product Manager at an Early Stage Startup

10x10: Ten Life Lessons from a Developer After Ten Years in the Industry

10 Things Every New Developer Should Know

10 Steps for Landing a Job at a Startup

10 Skills You Need For Your Post-Pandemic Career

AI Products Have Terrible UX: Here's Why

What No One Told Me About Being a Product Manager at an Early Stage Startup

10x10: Ten Life Lessons from a Developer After Ten Years in the Industry

10 Things Every New Developer Should Know

10 Steps for Landing a Job at a Startup

10 Skills You Need For Your Post-Pandemic Career

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Minty

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps