A follow up exploration of engineering thinking applied to governance A follow up exploration of engineering thinking applied to governance Introduction - Beyond the Code In my previous piece, I explored how engineers think differently i.e. how we approach problems with systematic rigor, empirical testing, and relentless focus on what actually works. But what happens when engineering thinking isn’t confined to building software or hardware? What happens when someone applies pure engineering principles to building an entire nation? Lee Kuan Yew happened. While most of us engineer applications, APIs, or infrastructure, Lee Kuan Yew engineered a country. And he did it with the same mindset that makes great engineers great i.e. empiricism over ideology, results over rhetoric, and reality over wishes. The Engineering Mindset Applied to Nation Building Define the Constraints Every engineering project starts with understanding constraints. Lee Kuan Yew faced constraints that would make any startup founder’s challenges look trivial: A tiny island with zero natural resources No defensible military position Hostile neighbors Deep ethnic divisions (Chinese, Malay, Indian populations) No industrial base A malarial swamp in a region prone to violence Zero international support or sympathy A tiny island with zero natural resources No defensible military position Hostile neighbors Deep ethnic divisions (Chinese, Malay, Indian populations) No industrial base A malarial swamp in a region prone to violence Zero international support or sympathy Most leaders would have made excuses. Lee Kuan Yew defined these as his requirements specification and got to work. requirements specification Study What Works Elsewhere Like any good engineer, he didn’t reinvent the wheel. He studied existing solutions: Switzerland’s cleanliness and precision Japan’s efficiency and work ethic Israel’s defense strategy for small nations with hostile neighbors Small European countries’ strategies for competing globally despite size disadvantages Switzerland’s cleanliness and precision Japan’s efficiency and work ethic Israel’s defense strategy for small nations with hostile neighbors Small European countries’ strategies for competing globally despite size disadvantages He traveled the world not as a tourist but as a systems analyst, reverse engineering successful models and identifying patterns that could be adapted. Adapt and Implement From my standpoint as an advocate of free as in freedom and open source, here’s where Lee Kuan Yew demonstrated true engineering genius i.e. he didn’t just copy, he forked and modified for Singapore’s specific context. forked and modified Port Infrastructure: Studied efficient ports worldwide, then built one that became among the busiest globally. Port Infrastructure Changi Airport: Analyzed best airports, then engineered one consistently ranked #1 in the world. Changi Airport Public Transportation: Examined successful transit systems, then built one that outperforms cities with far more resources. Public Transportation Urban Planning: Planted trees, cleaned neighborhoods systematically until Singapore became one of the cleanest major cities anywhere. Urban Planning The magic wasn’t in having revolutionary ideas. The magic was in execution. Most leaders have visions. Few have the discipline to implement them without compromise. execution Core Engineering Principles in Action 1. Understand Incentives (The Real API) Engineers know that systems behave according to their design incentives, not according to what we wish they’d do. Lee Kuan Yew understood this at a molecular level. The Littering Problem: Singapore had a massive litter problem. Rather than education campaigns or forming committees, he implemented heavy fines and consistent enforcement. Within a short time, Singapore became clean i.e. not because people became morally superior, but because the cost function changed. The Littering Problem cost function changed Civil Service Compensation: Pay government officials poorly, get poor officials. The best talent goes where it’s valued. Solution? Pay government ministers over $1 million annually. Pay senior civil servants comparable to private sector executives. Result? One of the most competent civil services in the world. Civil Service Compensation The Central Provident Fund (CPF): A mandatory savings system where both workers and employers contribute. But here’s the engineering brilliance: The Central Provident Fund (CPF) Forces savings: because people are terrible at voluntary saving Aligns individual and national interests: your retirement depends on the country’s economic performance Creates ownership: the money is yours, not a government promise Fully funded: each generation pays for itself, avoiding the demographic time bomb affecting most pension systems Forces savings: because people are terrible at voluntary saving Forces savings Aligns individual and national interests: your retirement depends on the country’s economic performance Aligns individual and national interests Creates ownership: the money is yours, not a government promise Creates ownership Fully funded: each generation pays for itself, avoiding the demographic time bomb affecting most pension systems Fully funded This is systems thinking at its finest i.e.designing incentive structures that produce desired behaviors naturally, without constant oversight. systems thinking 2. Test, Measure, Iterate Lee Kuan Yew approached policy like we approach code: Ship it → Measure results → Adjust based on data Ship it → Measure results → Adjust based on data He believed in eugenics policies based on his reading of science (encouraging educated couples to have more children). When evidence showed they weren’t working or were counterproductive, he adjusted them. No ego. No rigid attachment to failed ideas. adjusted them This intellectual flexibility i.e. the willingness to admit mistakes and pivot separates great engineers from ideologues who defend broken code because they wrote it. 3. Eliminate Technical Debt (Corruption) Every engineer knows technical debt kills projects. Corruption is governance’s technical debt shortcuts that feel expedient but compound into system failure. Lee Kuan Yew’s anti corruption strategy: Severe consequences: Make corruption extremely expensive Consistent enforcement: Not selective, everyone faces the same rules Lead by example: He lived modestly, didn’t accumulate personal wealth, set the cultural tone from the top Severe consequences: Make corruption extremely expensive Severe consequences Consistent enforcement: Not selective, everyone faces the same rules Consistent enforcement Lead by example: He lived modestly, didn’t accumulate personal wealth, set the cultural tone from the top Lead by example Result? Singapore regularly ranks as one of the least corrupt countries globally. Clean systems scale. Corrupt systems collapse. 4. Design for Scale and Succession The difference between a prototype and production code is whether it survives its creator. Most “great leaders” build systems dependent on their personal authority i.e. cults of personality disguised as governance. Lee Kuan Yew built institutions, not monuments to himself. He stepped down voluntarily. Transitioned power smoothly. Trained successors who were competent rather than merely loyal. Singapore continued thriving after he left power. This is production grade engineering i.e. building systems robust enough to run without constant intervention from their architect. production grade engineering The Alpha Engineer Approach to Hard Problems Healthcare - Reality Over Ideology Singapore’s healthcare system demonstrates engineering thinking: Problem: Healthcare overuse when costs are hiddenReality: People respond to incentivesSolution: Hybrid system where individuals have skin in the game through Medisave accounts (part of CPF), supplemented by catastrophic coverage Problem Reality Solution Result? Singapore spends far less per capita than Western nations while achieving better health outcomes. The system aligns incentives i.e. you’re spending your money, so you care about efficiency. Housing - Elegant System Design Most countries have housing disasters i.e. either spiraling prices, crime ridden public housing, or supply destroyed by rent control. Singapore’s solution demonstrates elegant architecture: Government builds high quality public housing (HDB flats) But people own them, not rent them Creates a property owning middle class with stake in system stability Prevents ethnic enclaves through deliberate integration policies Most citizens benefit from economic growth through asset appreciation Government builds high quality public housing (HDB flats) But people own them, not rent them But people own them Creates a property owning middle class with stake in system stability Prevents ethnic enclaves through deliberate integration policies Most citizens benefit from economic growth through asset appreciation Not “ideological”, Not “neoliberalism”. Not “socialist” or “capitalist”. Just pragmatic engineering solving multiple problems with one well designed system. pragmatic engineering Education - Optimize for Outcomes Education policy in most places is driven by theorists who’ve never run anything. Singapore’s approach: Brutally meritocratic Rigorous testing and high standards Teachers well-paid and respected Parents expected to support education Under performance has consequences Brutally meritocratic Rigorous testing and high standards Teachers well-paid and respected Parents expected to support education Under performance has consequences Critics call it too stressful. Lee Kuan Yew would say “stress in school beats stress in life from being unprepared for reality.” Result? Singapore consistently ranks at or near the top of international education rankings. The system produces engineers, doctors, and civil servants capable of running a modern economy. produces engineers, doctors, and civil servants capable of running a modern economy Foreign Policy - Strategic Architecture Singapore can’t compete militarily. How do you secure a tiny nation with powerful neighbors? Lee Kuan Yew’s solution: Make Singapore indispensable. Make Singapore indispensable Financial hub Logistics hub Technology hub Regional headquarters for global companies Neutral legal system for dispute resolution Financial hub Logistics hub Technology hub Regional headquarters for global companies Neutral legal system for dispute resolution Threatening Singapore hurts the countries doing the threatening. This is security through economic integration i.e. brilliant strategic thinking for asymmetric situations. security through economic integration Why Most Leaders Aren’t Engineers The Ideology Trap Most leaders are ideologues. They start with an ideology (free market fundamentalism, socialism, populism) and force reality to fit their worldview. Engineers start with reality and build solutions that work within actual constraints. Lee Kuan Yew was asked “Are you socialist or capitalist?” His answer, essentially “Whatever works.” Markets for most resource allocation? Yes, they’re efficient. Government intervention for market failures? Yes, when necessary. Housing heavily managed? Yes. Healthcare with individual responsibility? Yes. Strategic industries with government support? Yes. Markets for most resource allocation? Yes, they’re efficient. Government intervention for market failures? Yes, when necessary. Housing heavily managed? Yes. Healthcare with individual responsibility? Yes. Strategic industries with government support? Yes. This pragmatic mix drives both free market purists and socialist ideologues crazy. They want you to pick a team. pragmatic mix Lee Kuan Yew picked results. results The Approval Addiction Most politicians need applause. They need to be loved by journalists, academics, voters. They make compromises that feel good but produce bad results. Lee Kuan Yew made decisions that felt harsh but produced good results. Drug policy: Extremely tough laws, death penalty for trafficking, zero tolerance. Western liberals call it barbaric. Drug policy Result? Singapore has almost no drug problem. Walk through Singapore at night i.e. you’re safer than almost anywhere on Earth. No neighborhoods destroyed by addiction. No families torn apart by opioids. You can debate whether the approach is too harsh. You cannot debate whether it worked. cannot This is the difference between leadership and performance art. Political Correctness vs. Correctness Lee Kuan Yew said: “I always tried to be correct, not politically correct.” “I always tried to be correct, not politically correct.” This sentence explains everything. Political correctness is perception management. Being correct is reality management. Most leaders spend energy worrying about offending people, about criticism, about how history will judge them. All that energy on perception is energy not spent solving actual problems. not spent solving actual problems If something needed saying, he said it. If a policy would offend but would work, he implemented it anyway. If conventional wisdom was wrong, he ignored it. The Harsh Truth About Success No Excuses, Only Results After WWII, dozens of countries gained independence. Most had terrible outcomes i.e.corruption, civil wars, economic stagnation, coups, ethnic violence. Why did Singapore succeed when others failed? Lee Kuan Yew refused to make excuses. Lee Kuan Yew refused to make excuses. Other leaders: “Colonialism destroyed us.”Lee Kuan Yew: “Colonialism was bad. That’s the past. Let’s build something better.” Other leaders: “We have no resources.”Lee Kuan Yew: “We’ll build an economy based on services and manufacturing.” Other leaders: “Ethnic divisions will destroy us.”Lee Kuan Yew: “We’ll design systems that manage those divisions.” He took every disadvantage and either overcame it or worked around it. He never said “we can’t do that because of our circumstances.” This mentality separates success from failure in nations, businesses, and individual lives. The Engineering Lesson for Today I think about this contrast constantly i.e. Young people in wealthy Western countries complaining about inequality, lack of opportunity, rigged systems. Meanwhile, Lee Kuan Yew looked at a malarial swamp with zero resources, hostile neighbors, ethnic divisions, no international support and built Singapore. The difference? Mindset. Mindset. Lee Kuan Yew never wasted energy complaining about unfairness. He spent all his energy solving problems. In your own life, in your engineering work, you face the same choice: Spend time complaining about why things are hard, or spend time figuring out what works and doing it. Spend time complaining about why things are hard, or spend time figuring out what works and doing it. The first approach produces resentment. The second produces results. What We Can Learn as Engineers 1. Face Reality Without Flinching Our code doesn’t care about our feelings. Systems behave according to their design, not our intentions. The same applies to everything else. Lee Kuan Yew looked at reality, human nature, incentive structures, geopolitical constraints and worked with it, not against it. 2. Competence Over Credentials Singapore’s government selects for people who can run things, not people who are good at campaigning or giving speeches. run things In our field, we understand this i.e. the best engineer isn’t always the one with the most prestigious degree or who interviews well. It’s the one who ships working code. Apply that principle everywhere. 3. Systems Thinking Over Quick Fixes Lee Kuan Yew didn’t just solve today’s problems. He designed systems that would work for generations i.e.the CPF’s demographic resistance, institutional quality that survived his departure. As engineers, we know the difference between a hack that works now and architecture that scales. Build for the long term. 4. Measure What Matters “I always tried to be correct, not politically correct.” Translation i.e. Optimize for actual outcomes, not optics. Don’t confuse metrics that look good with metrics that matter. 5. Iterate Based on Evidence Even Lee Kuan Yew’s bad ideas (some eugenics policies) were adjusted when evidence showed they didn’t work. No ego driven defense of failed approaches. Good engineers kill their darlings when the data says they’re wrong. The Uncomfortable Truth Lee Kuan Yew proved something important and uncomfortable: small countries with no natural advantages can succeed if governed well. small countries with no natural advantages can succeed if governed well This is hopeful, it means disadvantages can be overcome, that leadership and governance matter more than starting conditions. But here’s the catch i.e. it requires leaders who think like engineers. Leaders who: Face reality without illusions Resist ideology in favor of empiricism Tolerate criticism but ignore noise Hire competent people and fire incompetent ones Design systems based on incentives, not wishes Work tirelessly for decades without losing focus Face reality without illusions Resist ideology in favor of empiricism Tolerate criticism but ignore noise Hire competent people and fire incompetent ones Design systems based on incentives, not wishes Work tirelessly for decades without losing focus How many leaders like that exist? Very few. That’s why Singapore’s success is rare. It didn’t require miracles or luck. It required sustained excellence in execution. sustained excellence in execution And sustained excellence in anything is rare because it’s hard. Conclusion - Building vs. Talking Lee Kuan Yew was not perfect but he demonstrated something that needs demonstrating over and over: Intelligence, discipline, and focus on reality can overcome almost any disadvantage. Intelligence, discipline, and focus on reality can overcome almost any disadvantage. Alpha Engineers are builders in a world full of talkers. We care about results in a world obsessed with appearances. We face reality in a world hiding from it. That’s engineering thinking applied at the highest level. As engineers, we have something in common with Lee Kuan Yew: we build things that actually work. We can’t fake our way through a broken system. We can’t spin failure into success with clever marketing. Code either runs or it doesn’t. Infrastructure either scales or it doesn’t. Systems either work or they don’t. The same is true for everything else, you just have to have the courage to apply engineering thinking beyond your terminal. Lee Kuan Yew did. And Singapore stands as proof that when you approach problems like an engineer, empirically, pragmatically, relentlessly, you can build something extraordinary from almost nothing. The formula is simple i.e. Face reality. Figure out what works. Execute relentlessly. Measure honestly. Adjust when necessary. The formula is simple i.e. Face reality. Figure out what works. Execute relentlessly. Measure honestly. Adjust when necessary. Simple, but not easy. That’s engineering. Let’s Go!
