The extern "C" ABI for the wasm32-unknown-unknown target has been using a non-standard definition since the inception of the target in that it does not implement the official C ABI of WebAssembly and it additionally leaks internal compiler implementation details of both the Rust compiler and LLVM. This will change in a future version of the Rust compiler and the official C ABI will be used instead. extern "C" wasm32-unknown-unknown official C ABI of WebAssembly leaks internal compiler implementation details official C ABI This post details some history behind this change and the rationale for why it's being announced here, but you can skip straight to "Am I affected?" as well. "Am I affected?" History of wasm32-unknown-unknown's C ABI wasm32-unknown-unknown When the wasm32-unknown-unknown target was originally added in 2017, not much care was given to the exact definition of the extern "C" ABI at the time. In 2018 an ABI definition was added just for wasm and the target is still using this definition to this day. This definitions has become more and more problematic over time and while some issues have been fixed, the root cause still remains. wasm32-unknown-unknown was originally added extern "C" an ABI definition was added just for wasm to this day Notably this ABI definition does not match the tool-conventions definition of the C API, which is the current standard for how WebAssembly toolchains should talk to one another. Originally this non-standard definition was used for all WebAssembly based targets except Emscripten, but this changed in 2021 where the WASI targets for Rust use a corrected ABI definition. Still, however, the non-standard definition remained in use for wasm32-unknown-unknown. tool-conventions this changed in 2021 wasm32-unknown-unknown The time has now come to correct this historical mistake and the Rust compiler will soon be using a correct ABI definition for the wasm32-unknown-unknown target. This means, however, that generated WebAssembly binaries will be different than before. wasm32-unknown-unknown What is a WebAssembly C ABI? The definition of an ABI answers questions along the lines of: What registers are arguments passed in?
What registers are results passed in?
How is a 128-bit integers passed as an argument?
How is a union passed as a return value?
When are parameters passed through memory instead of registers?
What is the size and alignment of a type in memory? What registers are arguments passed in? What registers are results passed in? How is a 128-bit integers passed as an argument? How is a union passed as a return value? union When are parameters passed through memory instead of registers? What is the size and alignment of a type in memory? For WebAssembly these answers are a little different than native platforms. For example, WebAssembly does not have physical registers and functions must all be annotated with a type. What WebAssembly does have is types such as i32, i64, f32, and f64. This means that for WebAssembly an ABI needs to define how to represent values in these types. i32 i64 f32 f64 This is where the tool-conventions document comes in. That document provides a definition for how to represent primitives in C in the WebAssembly format, and additionally how function signatures in C are mapped to function signatures in WebAssembly. For example a Rust u32 is represented by a WebAssembly i32 and is passed directly as a parameter as a function argument. If the Rust structure #[repr(C)] struct Pair(f32, f64) is returned from a function then a return pointer is used which must have alignment 8 and size of 16 bytes. tool-conventions u32 i32 #[repr(C)] struct Pair(f32, f64) In essence, the WebAssembly C ABI is acting as a bridge between C's type system and the WebAssembly type system. This includes details such as in-memory layouts and translations of a C function signature to a WebAssembly function signature. How is wasm32-unknown-unknown non-standard? wasm32-unknown-unknown Despite the ABI definition today being non-standard, many aspects of it are still the same as what tool-conventions specifies. For example, size/alignment of types is the same as it is in C. The main difference is how function signatures are calculated. An example (where you can follow along on godbolt) is: tool-conventions godbolt #[repr(C)]
pub struct Pair {
    x: u32,
    y: u32,
}

#[unsafe(no_mangle)]
pub extern "C" fn pair_add(pair: Pair) -> u32 {
    pair.x + pair.y
} #[repr(C)]
pub struct Pair {
    x: u32,
    y: u32,
}

#[unsafe(no_mangle)]
pub extern "C" fn pair_add(pair: Pair) -> u32 {
    pair.x + pair.y
} This will generate the following WebAssembly function: (func $pair_add (param i32 i32) (result i32)
  local.get 1
  local.get 0
  i32.add
) (func $pair_add (param i32 i32) (result i32)
  local.get 1
  local.get 0
  i32.add
) Notably you can see here that the struct Pair was "splatted" into its two components so the actual $pair_add function takes two arguments, the x and y fields. The tool-conventions, however specifically says that "other struct[s] or union[s]" are passed indirectly, notably through memory. We can see this by compiling this C code: Pair $pair_add x y tool-conventions struct Pair {
    unsigned x;
    unsigned y;
};

unsigned pair_add(struct Pair pair) {
    return pair.x + pair.y;
} struct Pair {
    unsigned x;
    unsigned y;
};

unsigned pair_add(struct Pair pair) {
    return pair.x + pair.y;
} which yields the generated function: (func (param i32) (result i32)
  local.get 0
  i32.load offset=4
  local.get 0
  i32.load
  i32.add
) (func (param i32) (result i32)
  local.get 0
  i32.load offset=4
  local.get 0
  i32.load
  i32.add
) Here we can see, sure enough, that pair is passed in linear memory and this function only has a single argument, not two. This argument is a pointer into linear memory which stores the x and y fields. pair x y The Diplomat project has compiled a much more comprehensive overview than this and it's recommended to check that out if you're curious for an even deeper dive. compiled a much more comprehensive overview Why hasn't this been fixed long ago already? For wasm32-unknown-unknown it was well-known at the time in 2021 when WASI's ABI was updated that the ABI was non-standard. Why then has the ABI not been fixed like with WASI? The main reason originally for this was the wasm-bindgen project. wasm32-unknown-unknown wasm-bindgen project In wasm-bindgen the goal is to make it easy to integrate Rust into a web browser with WebAssembly. JavaScript is used to interact with host APIs and the Rust module itself. Naturally, this communication touches on a lot of ABI details! The problem was that wasm-bindgen relied on the above example, specifically having Pair "splatted" across arguments instead of passed indirectly. The generated JS wouldn't work correctly if the argument was passed in-memory. wasm-bindgen wasm-bindgen Pair At the time this was discovered it was found to be significantly difficult to fix wasm-bindgen to not rely on this splatting behavior. At the time it also wasn't thought to be a widespread issue nor was it costly for the compiler to have a non-standard ABI. Over the years though the pressure has mounted. The Rust compiler is carrying an ever-growing list of hacks to work around the non-standard C ABI on wasm32-unknown-unknown. Additionally more projects have started to rely on this "splatting" behavior and the risk has gotten greater that there are more unknown projects relying on the non-standard behavior. wasm-bindgen ever-growing list of hacks wasm32-unknown-unknown In late 2023 the wasm-bindgen project fixed bindings generation to be unaffected by the transition to the standard definition of extern "C". In the following months a future-incompat lint was added to rustc to specifically migrate users of old wasm-bindgen versions to a "fixed" version. This was in anticipation of changing the ABI of wasm32-unknown-unknown once enough time had passed. Since early 2025 users of old wasm-bindgen versions will now receive a hard error asking them to upgrade. the wasm-bindgen project fixed bindings generation extern "C" future-incompat lint was added to rustc wasm-bindgen wasm32-unknown-unknown wasm-bindgen will now receive a hard error Despite all this heroic effort done by contributors, however, it has now come to light that there are more projects than wasm-bindgen relying on this non-standard ABI definition. Consequently this blog post is intended to serve as a notice to other users on wasm32-unknown-unknown that the ABI break is upcoming and projects may need to be changed. wasm-bindgen wasm32-unknown-unknown Am I affected? If you don't use the wasm32-unknown-unknown target, you are not affected by this change. If you don't use extern "C" on the wasm32-unknown-unknown target, you are also not affected. If you fall into this bucket, however, you may be affected! wasm32-unknown-unknown extern "C" wasm32-unknown-unknown To determine the impact to your project there are a few tools at your disposal: A new future-incompat warning has been added to the Rust compiler which will issue a warning if it detects a signature that will change when the ABI is changed.
In 2023 a -Zwasm-c-abi=(legacy|spec) flag was added to the Rust compiler. This defaults to -Zwasm-c-abi=legacy, the non-standard definition. Code can use -Zwasm-c-abi=spec to use the standard definition of the C ABI for a crate to test out if changes work. A new future-incompat warning has been added to the Rust compiler which will issue a warning if it detects a signature that will change when the ABI is changed. future-incompat warning In 2023 a -Zwasm-c-abi=(legacy|spec) flag was added to the Rust compiler. This defaults to -Zwasm-c-abi=legacy, the non-standard definition. Code can use -Zwasm-c-abi=spec to use the standard definition of the C ABI for a crate to test out if changes work. -Zwasm-c-abi=(legacy|spec) -Zwasm-c-abi=legacy -Zwasm-c-abi=spec The best way to test your crate is to compile with nightly-2025-03-27 or later, ensure there are no warnings, and then test your project still works with -Zwasm-c-abi=spec. If all that passes then you're good to go and the upcoming change to the C ABI will not affect your project. nightly-2025-03-27 -Zwasm-c-abi=spec I'm affected, now what? So you're using wasm32-unknown-unknown, you're using extern "C", and the nightly compiler is giving you warnings. Additionally your project is broken when compiled with -Zwasm-c-abi=spec. What now? wasm32-unknown-unknown extern "C" -Zwasm-c-abi=spec At this time this will unfortunately be a somewhat rough transition period for you. There are a few options at your disposal but they all have their downsides: Pin your Rust compiler version to the current stable, don't update until the ABI has changed. This means that you won't get any compiler warnings (as old compilers don't warn) and additionally you won't get broken when the ABI changes (as you're not changing compilers). Eventually when you update to a stable compiler with -Zwasm-c-abi=spec as the default you'll have to port your JS or bindings to work with the new ABI.
Update to Rust nightly as your compiler and pass -Zwasm-c-abi=spec. This is front-loading the work required in (1) for your target. You can get your project compatible with -Zwasm-c-abi=spec today. The downside of this approach is that your project will only work with a nightly compiler and -Zwasm-c-abi=spec and you won't be able to use stable until the default is switched.
Update your project to not rely on the non-standard behavior of -Zwasm-c-abi=legacy. This involves, for example, not passing structs-by-value in parameters. You can pass &Pair above, for example, instead of Pair. This is similar to (2) above where the work is done immediately to update a project but has the benefit of continuing to work on stable Rust. The downside of this, however, is that you may not be able to easily change or update your C ABI in some situations.
Update to Rust nightly as your compiler and pass -Zwasm-c-abi=legacy. This will silence compiler warnings for now but be aware that the ABI will still change in the future and the -Zwasm-c-abi=legacy option will be removed entirely. When the -Zwasm-c-abi=legacy option is removed the only option will be the standard C ABI, what -Zwasm-c-abi=spec today enables. Pin your Rust compiler version to the current stable, don't update until the ABI has changed. This means that you won't get any compiler warnings (as old compilers don't warn) and additionally you won't get broken when the ABI changes (as you're not changing compilers). Eventually when you update to a stable compiler with -Zwasm-c-abi=spec as the default you'll have to port your JS or bindings to work with the new ABI. -Zwasm-c-abi=spec Update to Rust nightly as your compiler and pass -Zwasm-c-abi=spec. This is front-loading the work required in (1) for your target. You can get your project compatible with -Zwasm-c-abi=spec today. The downside of this approach is that your project will only work with a nightly compiler and -Zwasm-c-abi=spec and you won't be able to use stable until the default is switched. -Zwasm-c-abi=spec -Zwasm-c-abi=spec -Zwasm-c-abi=spec Update your project to not rely on the non-standard behavior of -Zwasm-c-abi=legacy. This involves, for example, not passing structs-by-value in parameters. You can pass &Pair above, for example, instead of Pair. This is similar to (2) above where the work is done immediately to update a project but has the benefit of continuing to work on stable Rust. The downside of this, however, is that you may not be able to easily change or update your C ABI in some situations. -Zwasm-c-abi=legacy &Pair Pair Update to Rust nightly as your compiler and pass -Zwasm-c-abi=legacy. This will silence compiler warnings for now but be aware that the ABI will still change in the future and the -Zwasm-c-abi=legacy option will be removed entirely. When the -Zwasm-c-abi=legacy option is removed the only option will be the standard C ABI, what -Zwasm-c-abi=spec today enables. -Zwasm-c-abi=legacy -Zwasm-c-abi=legacy -Zwasm-c-abi=legacy -Zwasm-c-abi=spec If you have uncertainties, questions, or difficulties, feel free to reach out on the tracking issue for the future-incompat warning or on Zulip. the tracking issue for the future-incompat warning Timeline of ABI changes At this time there is not an exact timeline of how the default ABI is going to change. It's expected to take on the order of 3-6 months, however, and will look something roughly like this: 2025 March: (soon) - a future-incompat warning will be added to the compiler to warn projects if they're affected by this ABI change.
2025-05-15: this future-incompat warning will reach the stable Rust channel as 1.87.0.
2025 Summer: (ish) - the -Zwasm-c-abi flag will be removed from the compiler and the legacy option will be entirely removed. 2025 March: (soon) - a future-incompat warning will be added to the compiler to warn projects if they're affected by this ABI change. future-incompat warning 2025-05-15: this future-incompat warning will reach the stable Rust channel as 1.87.0. 2025 Summer: (ish) - the -Zwasm-c-abi flag will be removed from the compiler and the legacy option will be entirely removed. -Zwasm-c-abi legacy Exactly when -Zwasm-c-abi is removed will depend on feedback from the community and whether the future-incompat warning triggers much. It's hoped that soon after the Rust 1.87.0 is stable, though, that the old legacy ABI behavior can be removed. -Zwasm-c-abi Credits: Alex Crichton Credits: Alex Crichton Also published here Also published here here Photo by Ross Findon on Unsplash Photo by Ross Findon on Unsplash Ross Findon Unsplash

Unsplash

wasm32-unknown-unknown - The C ABI Changes That You Need to Know About

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

All the Details and Changes That Came With Rust 1.82.0

10 Most Sought-After Programming Languages You Should Learn In 2021

The Noonification: How to Move Away From Twitter (12/15/2022)

The Noonification: The Wall of Death (12/26/2022)

6 Best Rust Programming Books Ranked by Reviews

The Noonification: Why We Rewrote Ockam in Rust (7/9/2023)

All the Details and Changes That Came With Rust 1.82.0

10 Most Sought-After Programming Languages You Should Learn In 2021

The Noonification: How to Move Away From Twitter (12/15/2022)

The Noonification: The Wall of Death (12/26/2022)

6 Best Rust Programming Books Ranked by Reviews

The Noonification: Why We Rewrote Ockam in Rust (7/9/2023)

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Minty

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps