Before you go, check out these stories!

0
Hackernoon logoWant to raise a series A? Be smarter at seed by@foundercollective

Want to raise a series A? Be smarter at seed

Author profile picture

@foundercollectiveFounder Collective

David Frankel, Managing Partner

The “Series A crunch” sometimes still feels real. It dooms many startups that could otherwise have easily survived if they had been more strategic about their seed-stage fundraising.

As capital floods into the venture markets, “seed” has long since gone from being a stage to being a gradient that encompasses everything from a $500K check to a professional $5M round. Entrepreneurs need to understand this new reality. Failing to appreciate the fluid nature of the new seed funding marketplace makes it possible to overcapitalize or sub-optimize your funding strategy in many new ways (in addition to all the old ways funding can create challenges).

The Seed Gradient

There are sector and geography filters and exceptions at the edge that add nuance, but an early stage entrepreneur is likely to be lumped into one of these buckets. The danger is that entrepreneurs haven’t yet internalized these subtle distinctions and are casting about for capital unaware of some of the new dangers created by this evolving landscape.

Your goal is still (probably) raising a Series A

Few startups plan to get to profitability on a single round of funding, so they need to think about a sequence of fundraises. A desirable series A in 2018 looks like at least a $30M pre-money valuation. To justify that level of investment, a startup will need to be on a $5M run rate, or else have genuinely compelling user growth numbers or a real case to be made about their tech stack. If your plan doesn’t hit those milestones, you’ll want to rethink your seed round as a multi-stage affair.

Seed Gradient Failure Modes

Skipping ahead on stages

Optimizing only for valuation at seed is a trap. I’ve seen bright seniors in college trying to raise money for pre-product startups at a $10M pre-money valuation. Avoiding dilution feels like a major victory at the moment, but I expect many of these founders will feel defeated when they’ve failed to justify their valuations and are unable to find a follow-on investor in 12–18 months. These entrepreneurs are setting themselves up for defeat or minimally, a flat round or two.

Overfunding is a risk at any stage of a startup’s life, but it can be more manageable in the later stages. If a startup has figured out product/market fit, is generating revenue, and can grow organically, it is possible to grow into an ambitious valuation. Seed-stage startups don’t have this luxury.

Death by a thousand raises

A variation on the “lump sum” overfunding is a failure by a thousand raises. It’s now possible to:

  • Raise $250–$500K based on founder bios and a business plan
  • Raise $1–2M on a working prototype and a couple of reference clients
  • Raise another $1–2M to buff metrics before going out for the series A
  • When the company struggles to scale, but there are sparks of opportunity in an adjacent market, good founders can raise another $1–2M more on the promise of a pivot.
  • Once the team is generating solid MRR, but not enough to raise an A, the already-committed seed investors may well write a bridge check for another million to spur metrics; especially if the startup pivoted into a “hot” market.

At some point three to four years have passed, you’ve raised >$5M in “seed” capital and still don’t have the numbers to break into the A territory. Eventually, investors lose enthusiasm and the company winds down or is mercifully acquihired.

Failure to hit escape velocity

There’s a noticeable gap between the “Seed Plus” segment of the seed gradient and the minimum threshold for a series A. It’s all too easy for a seed-stage startup to get stuck in the $1–2M ARR range and not have enough in the way of intangible factors to close a deal.

How to Navigate the Seed Gradient

Obsess over traction

It’s the most basic advice, but traction on any dimension — users, revenue, engagement, declining CAC, or reference customers — is the most valuable thing founders can bring to the table. A startup that looks like it is inflecting can paper over the fact that it’s stuck in a cooling category or led by people with thin resumes.

High valuation, quick close, good investors — Choose two

In today’s market, you can choose to optimize for price, speed, or quality investors. Unless you have achieved product/market fit and have built a repeatable sales model, you will most likely close faster if you raise at a lower valuation than a higher one. To be totally clear, founders will suffer more dilution this way, but they will “get it done” and will most likely minimize the chance that they’ll overvalue themselves before they’ve reached product/market fit. Flight instructors tell young pilots that “it’s better to have the runway in front of you than behind you” and the same basic advice applies in venture. I’m not suggesting that founders compromise on valuation — I am suggesting that you think through which dimensions you consider to be most important between price, speed and perceived quality of your investor.

Frame your story

Today, more than ever, founders need to do a better job explaining their progress in relation to funds raised and how the products fit into the macro environment. We’ve seen seed funds decide not to invest in promising companies because they believe they’ve already been seed funded when in reality, their funding was more in line with a pre-seed round. Get ahead of any potential misperceptions, or risk having doors closed prematurely. Metrics are the essential element of a pitch, but founders have the power to present them through a flattering lens. Getting to product market/fit on a million dollars invested is impressive. Continuing to fumble for product/market fit after five million invested…is less impressive.

Ride the waves

We’ve seen companies with poor metrics raise at higher valuations, faster, and often from better investors than peer companies with better metrics because they could tell a compelling story about how their startup leveraged blockchain, deep learning, etc. Please don’t take this to mean that you should tell a story that isn’t true, or bend your product roadmap towards the tech du jour to raise funding. These herd behaviors have a half-life, and you shouldn’t mortgage your future for the sake of a single round of fundraising, but it’s also helpful to understand when and why you may actually have the wind at your back.

You may be able to put off raising capital, for a bit

Capital is easy to come by, historically speaking, and this leads many startups to treat it as a perennial resource. Founders need to cultivate an ability to live within budgets, lest they fall into the “Death by a thousand raises” trap described above. We’ve previously highlighted 50+ companies that got huge, some who went public, without raising venture capital, never mind a seed round. Don’t forget about angels along with friends and family. They’ll invest because they love you or your idea, not the expected returns. It’s still actually possible to build something extraordinary with very little capital.

Tags

Join Hacker Noon

Create your free account to unlock your custom reading experience.