paint-brush
The US Conceded That The Warrant Presented to Microsoft Did Not Apply to Overseas Locationsby@legalpdf

The US Conceded That The Warrant Presented to Microsoft Did Not Apply to Overseas Locations

by Legal PDFNovember 3rd, 2023
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story w/o Javascript
tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

The government conceded at oral argument that the warrant provisions of the SCA do not contemplate or permit extraterritorial application.
featured image - The US Conceded That The Warrant Presented to Microsoft Did Not Apply to Overseas Locations
Legal PDF HackerNoon profile picture

Microsoft v. United States (2016) Court Filing, retrieved on July 14, 2016, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This part is 10 of 22.

C. Whether the SCA’s Warrant Provisions Contemplate Extraterritorial Application

We dispose of the first question with relative ease.  The government conceded at oral argument that the warrant provisions of the SCA do not contemplate or permit extraterritorial application.[19] Our review of the statute confirms the soundness of this concession.




[19] When asked, “What text in the Stored Communications Act do you point to, to support your assertion that . . . Congress intended extraterritorial application?”, the government responded, “There’s no extraterritorial application here at all.”  Recording of Oral Argument at 1:06:40– 1:07:00.  Later, when Judge Lynch observed, “I take it that suggests that the government actually agrees that there shall not be extraterritorial application of the Stored Communications Act . . . what this dispute is about is about the focus of the statute and what counts as an extraterritorial application of the statute,” the government answered, “That’s right, Judge.”  Id. at 1:25:38– 1:26:05.


Continue Reading Here.


About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.


This court case No. 15–777 retrieved on September 27, 2023, from cases.justia.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.