Recently I wrote about the only leadership theory that matters and then asked why people follow your lead.
Most of you approached this by asking yourself, “Why do I follow someone?” This is a wonderful way to begin your exploration of the topic.
(Fun fact — psychologists call this “me-search”, a bit of a pun on “research”. The fancy name for this is “autoethnography”,)
You shared thoughts such as:
After doing more reading, thinking, and me-search, I’ve formed a working Theory of Followership.
1. Trust/Relationship — They feel a positive relationship toward the leader.2. Competence — They feel the leader is competent.3. Vision/Purpose — They feel the leader is going in a “good” direction.4. Admiration — They feel the leader has positive qualities, which they wish to possess.5. Environment — The environment reinforces followership activities.
First, consider each factor on a scale from -5 to +5.
Now, let me offer a hypothesis:
To achieve active followership at least 2 factors must score greater than +3, as long as the other factors aren’t below zero.
For example, I’ve had a boss who I enthusiastically followed who scored this way:1.Trust/Relationship: +32. Competence: +53. Vision/Purpose: 04. Admiration: +15. Environment: +1
I’ve had another boss who I struggled to follow, because at least one factor was below 0:1. Trust/Relationship: +32. Competence: -23. Vision/Purpose: +34. Admiration: -15. Environment: +2
Even though we had a good relationship (+3), a shared purpose (+3), I didn’t feel they were competent (-2) in their current role, and I didn’t really admire them (-1).
No matter how high some factors are, the more factors come in below zero, the less we actively follow.
Finally, I had a boss who I couldn’t stand, but followed anyhow, that scored like this:1. Trust/Relationship: -12. Competence: -23. Vision/Purpose: +24. Admiration: 05. Environment: +5
This was a job that I had to have to pay the bills, or my kids would be on the street. I did somewhat believe in the work, but truthfully, I was there for the money.
I don’t think I really “followed” him, but I did what he told me to so I wouldn’t get fired. Maybe we could call that “passive followership” (or “death march”). <grin>
Each factor is subjective, and we’re scoring from the perspective of the follower, not the leader.
This means what’s important is not how leaders try to be perceived, but how they are actually perceived by their team.
As Virginia Satir wisely said, “You can’t see your own back, but everyone else can.”
The only score that matters is the one that followers give you. You’ve got to find a way to get information from them, and then create a feedback loop for improvement.
DO try this at homeTake a step beyond me-search and take a few minutes to rank someone above you on the scale presented above.
I’d love to hear how this went. Leave a comment, or drop me a line at [email protected].