The Battle for Internet Governance: Authoritarian Agendas vs. Multistakeholder Normsby@whitehouse
137 reads

The Battle for Internet Governance: Authoritarian Agendas vs. Multistakeholder Norms

by The White HouseMay 13th, 2024
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story w/o Javascript
tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

Authoritarian states such as Russia and China are challenging the multistakeholder model of Internet governance, aiming to reshape cyber norms and weaken human rights commitments on a global scale. Their influence extends to international technology policy discussions, raising concerns about the future of an open and democratic Internet.
featured image - The Battle for Internet Governance: Authoritarian Agendas vs. Multistakeholder Norms
The White House HackerNoon profile picture

You can jump to any part of the United States International Cyberspace & Digital Policy Strategy here. This part is 5 of 38.

Competing Internet Norms

Russia, the PRC, and other authoritarian states have promoted a vision of global Internet governance that centers on domestic control and top-down, state-centric mechanisms over the existing bottom-up multistakeholder processes. Russia and the PRC attempt to use multilateral fora like the UN to exert their influence on and appeal to developing countries, with the aim of reshaping the global cyber and technology policy landscape to advance an authoritarian agenda while hampering the United States and its allies. Russia, the PRC, and others seek to reshape norms governing cyberspace, undermine the technical underpinnings of the Internet, and dilute accountability for authoritarian countries’ malicious use of cyberspace capabilities.

Authoritarian governments are working to weaken global commitment to universal human rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and international legal instruments, such as the UN Charter and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Authoritarian governments, most notably the PRC, are actively working to co-opt and redefine well-established terminology related to “democracy” and “human rights” in the context of international technology policy development, including through their input into the UN Pact for the Future process and its Global Digital Compact.

Continue Reading Here.

This post was originally published on May 6, 2024, by the U.S Department of State