A judge at a Texas court has ordered two individuals behind the pirate IPTV service Easybox IPTV to pay $9.9m in copyright infringement damages. In a judgment handed down this week, the judge awarded the maximum $150,000 in statutory damages for each of 66 copyrighted works willfully infringed by the defendants via their unlicensed streaming platform. As part of its ongoing campaign targeting unlicensed IPTV providers servicing the US market, broadcaster DISH Network filed a lawsuit in a Texas court last August. It Easybox, an IPTV service that reportedly offered subscribers more than 1,000 channels, including more than two dozen channels exclusively licensed by DISH. targeted The broadcaster’s lawsuits often target IPTV providers for alleged breaches of the Federal Communications Act but in this instance, the lawsuit was based in copyright law. In common with other similar actions currently winding their way through US courts, this one met little opposition along the way. DISH says it tried to get Easybox to stop its illegal activities on many occasions before filing the lawsuit, including by sending around 300 copyright infringement notices to the provider and its CDN providers between 2016 and 2019. All were ignored so the broadcaster was left with little option but to bring the matter before a judge. As last week, DISH recently put forward a proposed final judgment and permanent injunction for the court’s consideration. That has now been largely accepted and signed off by the court, with some exceptions, but largely along the lines of DISH’s recommendations. reported in detail In an order signed February 5 by District Court Judge Lynn N. Hughes, the Judge notes that defendants Hung Tran and Thi Nga Nguyen were served on November 21, 2019, but neither filed an answer or otherwise appeared to defend the action. As a result, the order grants DISH $150,000 in statutory damages for 66 of DISH’s copyrighted works infringed via the IPTV service. “Dish Network LLC will take $9,900,000 from Hung Tran, Thi Nga Nguyen, and Easybox IPTV, jointly and severally, plus interest,” the default judgment reads. “This amount reflects statutory damages of $150,000 for their willful infringement of sixty-six of Dish’s copyrighted works.” The terms of the permanent junction are less tightly-worded than those proposed by DISH but still restrain the defendants, Easybox IPTV, or any entity they create, from distributing DISH’s channels in the United States or selling Easybox set-top boxes or IPTV subscriptions that stream DISH’s channels. The injunction also orders various service providers to stop doing business with Easybox and the named defendants, if that business entails transmitting copyrighted TV shows. Those third-party Internet companies are named as Global Layer B.V. and WorldStream B.V. (Netherlands), OVH Hosting Inc. (Canada), and Netrouting Inc. (United States). In its proposed permanent injunction, DISH previously requested that the registries in control of domain names connected to Easybox should render them inaccessible before transferring them to DISH for the company’s use. The actual injunction handed down by Judge Hughes doesn’t go quite that far. “Registries must disable the domain names used to transmit Dish’s protected channels within forty-eight hours of receiving this order. The domain names to be disabled include easybox.tv, e900x.com, and k2442.com, and any future domain name used by Easybox IPTV, Hung Tran, or Thi Nga Nguyen to transmit Dish’s channels.” Whether the defendants will pay all or indeed any of the damages handed down by the Court remains an open question. The Easybox service and associated sites appear to have been down for some time. The default judgment and injunction can be viewed here (pdf) Originally published as “ US Court Orders Easybox IPTV to Pay $9.9m in Copyright Infringement Damages ” with the Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC 3.0) license

DISH Network

Target

Bad Boys For Life Leads Wave of Early Movie Releases Flooding Pirate Sites

Texas Court Orders Easybox IPTV to Pay $9.9m in Copyright Infringement Damages

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Zero People Charged With Online Pirating, Swedish Prosecutor's Office Reports

Zero People Charged With Online Pirating, Swedish Prosecutor's Office Reports

100 Stories To Learn About Online Piracy

The Noonification: Much Ado About Bitcoin Halving (1/6/2024)

114 Stories To Learn About Piracy

123 Stories To Learn About Internet Censorship

Zero People Charged With Online Pirating, Swedish Prosecutor's Office Reports

Zero People Charged With Online Pirating, Swedish Prosecutor's Office Reports

100 Stories To Learn About Online Piracy

The Noonification: Much Ado About Bitcoin Halving (1/6/2024)

114 Stories To Learn About Piracy

123 Stories To Learn About Internet Censorship

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Minty

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps