Some Shocking Data Analyses About Stablecoins

Stablecoins are one of the most relevant developments in the crypto ecosystem and one that has been increasingly getting traction. Recently, I presented a session that highlighted some interesting analyses that arise from applying data science methods on stablecoin’s blockchain data. The slide deck and video from the session will be available soon but I thought I share some of the most intriguing data points. At a high level, stablecoins can be divided in three main categories: 1. This type of stablecoins is typically pegged to a fiat currency or other real world assets. Projects such as Tether or TrueUSD as examples of stablecoins backed by fiat currencies while tokens such as Digix Global represent a commodity backed stablecoin. Fiat-Backed Stablecoins: 2. This type of stablecoins are backed by pools of crypto-assets. Typically, crypto-collateralized stablecoins tend to over-collateralized in order to address market volatility. Projects like Maker are notorious examples in this category. Crypto-Collateralized Stablecoins: 3. This type of stablecoins are not backed by any real-world or cryptocurrency asset, and instead it maintains value by people expecting it will maintain a certain value. The most-common non-collateralized method is seigniorage shares which uses smart contracts that automatically expand and contract the supply of the non-collateralized stablecoin using algorithms to maintain its value. Projects like Carbon are relevant examples of this category. Non-Collateralized: In the current market, fiat-based stablecoins are the dominant class while projects like Maker have achieved meaningful traction as crypto-collateralized stablecoins. Non-collateralized stablecoins remain highly experimental at this point. Despite the popularity of some of these projects, we know very little about their underlying behavior. Let’s look at some data points about fiat and crypto collateralized stablecoins that might surprise you. 5 Surprising Analytics About Fiat-Collateralized Stablecoins 1)Investors Have Lost Money with Stablecoins Stablecoins supposed to trade around a fixed value($1) so its strange that people would lost money while trading this asset. reveals that some investors have bought fiat-backed stablecoins at drastically higher levels than its base price. Let’s look at the following analysis for Tether and TrueUSD. IntoTheBlock’s In-Out Money analysis 2)Stablecoin Networks are not Growing Despite its increasing popularity, most fiat-backed stablecoin networks are not growing and, in some cases, they are shrinking as its revealed by . The following figures illustrates this phenomenon for Tether and Gemini Dollar. IntoTheBlock’s Address analysis 3)Most Stablecoins are Not Used for Large Transactions with the Exception of Tether Large transactions is always a good indicator of the health of a crypto-asset. reveals that most fiat-backed stablecoins are not seeing a lot of large transaction activity with the exception of Tether as shown in the following figures: IntoTheBlock’s Large Transaction analysis 4)Despite its Global Adoption, Most Fiat-Based Stablecoins are More Popular Outside Asia shows that most fiat-backed stablecoins remain more popular in western countries. A few months ago, Tether saw a tremendous level of adoption in Asia but that was overshadowed by a spike in adoption in western countries. The following figure shows the East-West analysis for Gemini Dollar and Tether. IntoTheBlock’s East-West analysis 5)Daily Activity Outside Tether is Still Relevant Even though Tether is by far the most dominant fiat-backed stablecoins, there is plenty of daily activity in other projects in this category. The following figure is the daily transaction graph of TrueUSD generated by . IntoTheBlock 5 Surprising Analysis About Crypto-Collateralized Stablecoins 1)Some Investor Have Lost Money with Dai Similarly to fiat-backed stable coins, for Dai reveals that some investors have acquired the stablecoin at values way above $1. IntoTheBlock’s In-Out Money analysis 2)Dai is Growing Contrasting with the shrinking behavior of the networks behind fiat-backed stablecoins, the Dai network has been growing at a very impressive pace as its shown by IntoTheBlock’s . Address Stats analysis 3)Large Transactions in Dai are not Consistent shows an inconsistent pattern when comes to Dai as shown in the following figure. IntoTheBlock’s Large Transaction analysis 4)Dai Has Been More Adopted Outside Asia In a somewhat surprising note, Dai has seen better levels of adoption in western countries than in Asia. highlights this pattern. IntoTheBlock’s East-West analysis 5)Dai’s Daily Trasaction Activity is Impressive If you saw TrueUSD’s daily transaction graph was solid, look at reveals about Dai’s daily activity. IntoTheBlock These are just some of the interesting facts about stablecoins that we have seen by exploring the IntoTheBlock platform. More interesting analysis to come soon.