SEC v. Terraform: Even If Some Violations Occured Outside the U.S., the Court Has Jurisdiction

SEC v. Terraform Court Filing, retrieved on February 16, 2023, is part of . You can jump to any part in this filing . This is part 5 of 38. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here JURISDICTION AND VENUE 17. The Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to Sections 20(b), 20(d) and 22(a) of the Securities Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 77t(b), 77t(d) and 77v(a), and Sections 21(d) and 27(a) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78u(d) and 78aa(a). 18. The Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants and venue is proper in this District pursuant to Section 22(a) of the Securities Act, 15 U.S.C. § 77v(a), and Section 27(a) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78aa(a), because, among other things, some of the acts and transactions in which Defendants engaged and that constitute violations of the federal securities laws occurred in this District. For example, as alleged herein, Defendants offered and sold securities and made materially false and misleading statements to investors located in this District in unregistered transactions. One or more investors who purchased crypto asset securities offered by Terraform and Kwon also had their principal place of business and/or residence within this District. 19. In addition, this Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants because Defendants engaged in conduct within the United States that constituted significant steps in furtherance of the violations of the federal securities laws alleged in this Complaint, even if some of the transactions at issue may have occurred outside the United States and involved foreign investors; and/or further because Defendants, whether within or outside of the United States, engaged in conduct that had a foreseeable substantial effect within the United States. 20. In connection with the conduct alleged in this Complaint, Defendants, directly and indirectly, singly or in concert with others, have made use of the means or instrumentalities of interstate commerce, the means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce, the mails, and/or the facilities of a national securities exchange - namely, through Defendants' use of the Internet and the U.S. banking system when engaging in the acts and transactions described herein. Continue Reading . Here About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case 1:23-cv-01346 retrieved on September 12, 2023, from is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. sec.gov

SEC v. Terraform: Even If Some Violations Occured Outside the U.S., the Court Has Jurisdiction

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

A Comprehensive List of Every Single Violation Terraform Labs and Do Kwon Committed

A Comprehensive List of Every Single Violation Terraform Labs and Do Kwon Committed

All of the Laws Do Kwon and Terraform Labs Violated

Do Kwon and Terraform Gave Investors A Reasonable Expectation of Profits: How They Talked LUNA Up

Do Kwon Lied to Investors About Chai: How He Dangled the Carrot In Front of Their Faces

Do Kwon Made UST Holders Believe That They Would Be Raking in Profits

A Comprehensive List of Every Single Violation Terraform Labs and Do Kwon Committed

A Comprehensive List of Every Single Violation Terraform Labs and Do Kwon Committed

All of the Laws Do Kwon and Terraform Labs Violated

Do Kwon and Terraform Gave Investors A Reasonable Expectation of Profits: How They Talked LUNA Up

Do Kwon Lied to Investors About Chai: How He Dangled the Carrot In Front of Their Faces

Do Kwon Made UST Holders Believe That They Would Be Raking in Profits

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Minty

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps