paint-brush
SEC v. Terraform: Explaining the Securities Act, the Definition of a Security, and Moreby@secagainsttheworld

SEC v. Terraform: Explaining the Securities Act, the Definition of a Security, and More

by SEC vs. the WorldOctober 6th, 2023
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story w/o Javascript
tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

Everything you need to know about the Securities Act and what a security actually is.

People Mentioned

Mention Thumbnail
featured image - SEC v. Terraform: Explaining the Securities Act, the Definition of a Security, and More
SEC vs. the World HackerNoon profile picture

SEC v. Terraform Court Filing, retrieved on February 16, 2023, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This is part 6 of 38.

21. Congress enacted the Securities Act to regulate the offer and sale of securities. In contrast to ordinary commercial principles of caveat emptor, Congress enacted a regime of full and fair disclosure, requiring those who offer and sell securities to the investing public to provide sufficient, accurate information to allow investors to make informed decisions before they invest.


22. Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act require that an issuer of securities like Terraform register offers and sales of those securities with the SEC when they offer and sell securities to the public.


Registration statements relating to an offering of securities thus provide public investors with material information about the issuer and the offering, including financial and managerial information, how the issuer will use offering proceeds, and the risks and trends that affect the enterprise and an investment in its securities.


23. The definition of a "security" under the federal securities laws includes a wide range of investment vehicles, including "investment contracts. See 15 U.S.C. § 77b(a)(1) (Securities Act Section 2(a)(1)). Investment contracts are instruments through which a person invests money in a common enterprise and reasonably expects profits or returns derived from the entrepreneurial or managerial efforts of others.


Courts have found that novel or unique investment vehicles constitute investment contracts, including interests in orange groves, animal breeding programs, railroads, mobile phones, crypt assets, and enterprises that exist only on the Internet.


As the United States Supreme Court noted in SEC v. W.J. Howey Co., Congress defined "security" broadly to embody a "flexible rather than a static principle, one that is capable of adaptation to meet the countless and variable schemes devised by those who seek the use of the money of others on the promise of profits." 328 U.S. 293, 299 (1946).


24. Security based swaps, which are themselves securities, include any agreement, contract, or transaction that is a swap as defined in Section la of the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and is based on a single security, including on the value thereof. See 15 U.S.C. § 78c(a)(68) (Exchange Act Section 3(a)(68)).


Section 1a(47) of the CEA defines "swap" to include "any agreement, contract, or transaction" that "provides on an executory basis for the exchange... of 1 or more payments based on the value or level of 1 or more... securities... and that transfers, as between the parties to the transaction, in whole or in part, the financial risk associated with a future change in any such value or level without also conveying a current or future direct or indirect ownership interest in [the] asset...."


25. Securities Act Section 5(e) makes it unlawful for any person to offer to sell, offer to buy, or purchase or sell a security-based swap to any person who is not an "eligible contract participant" without an effective registration statement. 15 U.S.C. § 77e(e). Exchange Act Section 6(1) also makes it unlawful for any person to effect transactions in security-based swaps to any person who is not an "eligible contract participant" unless the transaction is effected on a registered national securities exchange.


"Eligible contract participants" are defined to include high-net-worth individuals with "amounts invested on a discretionary basis" of $10 million (or $5 million if the individual enters into a hedging agreement) and certain types of sophisticated and/or regulated entities. 7 U.S.C. § 1a(18).

Continue Reading Here.


About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.


This court case 1:23-cv-01346 retrieved on September 12, 2023, from sec.gov is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.