SEC v. Binance Court Filing, retrieved on June 5, 2023 is part of . You can jump to any part in this filing . This is part 55 of 69. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here FACTS IX. BINANCE AND BAM TRADING WERE REQUIRED TO BUT DID NOT REGISTER AS AN EXCHANGE, BROKER-DEALER, OR CLEARING AGENCY. FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF Violations of Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act (Against Binance for Unregistered Offers and Sales of BNB) 514. The Commission realleges and incorporates by reference herein the allegations in Paragraphs 1-35, 80-238, 282-314, 325-363, and 510-513. 515. At all relevant times, by engaging in the conduct alleged in the Complaint, specifically by offering and selling BNB without a registration statement filed or in effect as to that security, Binance, directly and indirectly, made use of the means and instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or of the mails to sell securities through the use or medium of any prospectus or otherwise, carried or caused to be carried through the mails or in interstate commerce, by any means or instruments of transportation, that security for the purpose of sale or for delivery after sale, and/or made use of the means and instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or of the mails to offer to sell or offer to buy through the use or medium of a prospectus or otherwise of that security. 516. By reason of the conduct described above, Binance, violated, is violating, and, unless enjoined, will continue to violate Securities Act Sections 5(a) and 5(c) [15 U.S.C. §§ 77e(a) and (c)]. Continue Reading . Here About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case 1:23-cv-01599 retrieved on September 6, 2023, from is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. docdroid.net

Binance in Violation of Securities Act Sections 5(a) and 5(c)

Binance and BAM Trading in Hot Water for Refusing to Register as an Exchange 

Read My Stories

Too Long; Didn't Read

CTA: Download the FREE AI Productivity Shift report

SEC Takes Legal Action Against Binance Over Unregistered BNB Sales

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Untitled Story

SEC Seeks Over $1.7 Billion in Penalties from Ripple Labs for Alleged XRP Securities Law Violations

BAM Trading in the Hot Seat for Selling Staking Program As Unregistered Security

Binance and BAM Trading Charged for Neglecting to Register as Clearing Agency on Binance.US

Binance in Violation of Securities Act Sections 5(a) and 5(c)

Investigation Reveals Binance's Controversial Crypto Asset Securities Trading

SEC Seeks Over $1.7 Billion in Penalties from Ripple Labs for Alleged XRP Securities Law Violations

BAM Trading in the Hot Seat for Selling Staking Program As Unregistered Security

Binance and BAM Trading Charged for Neglecting to Register as Clearing Agency on Binance.US

Binance in Violation of Securities Act Sections 5(a) and 5(c)

Investigation Reveals Binance's Controversial Crypto Asset Securities Trading

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps