Table of Links Abstract and 1. Introduction Abstract and 1. Introduction Related Works


MaGGIe
3.1. Efficient Masked Guided Instance Matting
3.2. Feature-Matte Temporal Consistency


Instance Matting Datasets
4.1. Image Instance Matting and 4.2. Video Instance Matting


Experiments
5.1. Pre-training on image data
5.2. Training on video data


Discussion and References Related Works Related Works Related Works MaGGIe
3.1. Efficient Masked Guided Instance Matting
3.2. Feature-Matte Temporal Consistency MaGGIe 3.1. Efficient Masked Guided Instance Matting 3.1. Efficient Masked Guided Instance Matting 3.2. Feature-Matte Temporal Consistency 3.2. Feature-Matte Temporal Consistency Instance Matting Datasets
4.1. Image Instance Matting and 4.2. Video Instance Matting Instance Matting Datasets Instance Matting Datasets 4.1. Image Instance Matting and 4.2. Video Instance Matting 4.1. Image Instance Matting and 4.2. Video Instance Matting Experiments
5.1. Pre-training on image data
5.2. Training on video data Experiments Experiments 5.1. Pre-training on image data 5.1. Pre-training on image data 5.2. Training on video data 5.2. Training on video data Discussion and References Discussion and References Discussion and References Supplementary Material Supplementary Material Architecture details


Image matting
8.1. Dataset generation and preparation
8.2. Training details
8.3. Quantitative details
8.4. More qualitative results on natural images


Video matting
9.1. Dataset generation
9.2. Training details
9.3. Quantitative details
9.4. More qualitative results Architecture details Architecture details Architecture details Image matting
8.1. Dataset generation and preparation
8.2. Training details
8.3. Quantitative details
8.4. More qualitative results on natural images Image matting 8.1. Dataset generation and preparation 8.1. Dataset generation and preparation 8.2. Training details 8.2. Training details 8.3. Quantitative details 8.3. Quantitative details 8.4. More qualitative results on natural images 8.4. More qualitative results on natural images Video matting
9.1. Dataset generation
9.2. Training details
9.3. Quantitative details
9.4. More qualitative results Video matting 9.1. Dataset generation 9.1. Dataset generation 9.2. Training details 9.2. Training details 9.3. Quantitative details 9.3. Quantitative details 9.4. More qualitative results 9.4. More qualitative results 8.4. More qualitative results on natural images Fig. 13 showcases our model’s performance in challenging scenarios, particularly in accurately rendering hair regions. Our framework consistently outperforms MGM⋆ in detail preservation, especially in complex instance interactions. In comparison with InstMatt, our model exhibits superior instance separation and detail accuracy in ambiguous regions. Fig. 14 and Fig. 15 illustrate the performance of our model and previous works in extreme cases involving multiple instances. While MGM⋆ struggles with noise and accuracy in dense instance scenarios, our model maintains high precision. InstMatt, without additional training data, shows limitations in these complex settings. The robustness of our mask-guided approach is further demonstrated in Fig. 16. Here, we highlight the challenges faced by MGM variants and SparseMat in predicting missing parts in mask inputs, which our model addresses. However, it is important to note that our model is not designed as a human instance segmentation network. As shown in Fig. 17, our framework adheres to the input guidance, ensuring precise alpha matte prediction even with multiple instances in the same mask. Lastly, Fig. 12 and Fig. 11 emphasize our model’s generalization capabilities. The model accurately extracts both human subjects and other objects from backgrounds, showcasing its versatility across various scenarios and object types. All examples are Internet images without ground-truth and the mask from r101_fpn_400e are used as the guidance. Authors:
(1) Chuong Huynh, University of Maryland, College Park (chuonghm@cs.umd.edu);
(2) Seoung Wug Oh, Adobe Research (seoh,jolee@adobe.com);
(3) Abhinav Shrivastava, University of Maryland, College Park (abhinav@cs.umd.edu);
(4) Joon-Young Lee, Adobe Research (jolee@adobe.com). Authors: Authors: (1) Chuong Huynh, University of Maryland, College Park (chuonghm@cs.umd.edu); (2) Seoung Wug Oh, Adobe Research (seoh,jolee@adobe.com); (3) Abhinav Shrivastava, University of Maryland, College Park (abhinav@cs.umd.edu); (4) Joon-Young Lee, Adobe Research (jolee@adobe.com). This paper is available on arxiv under CC by 4.0 Deed (Attribution 4.0 International) license. This paper is available on arxiv under CC by 4.0 Deed (Attribution 4.0 International) license. available on arxiv available on arxiv

Part of HackerNoon's growing list of open-source research papers, promoting free access to academic material.

Robust Mask-Guided Matting: Managing Noisy Inputs and Object Versatility

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

3D Mapping Initialization: Using RGB-D Images and Camera Parameters

It Is Okay If You Don't Know What You Like. We Do (feat. Deep Recommendation Algorithms)

10 Machine Learning, Data Science, and Deep Learning Courses for Programmers in 2020

10 Computer Vision Startups on Product Hunt with the Most Upvotes

10 Best Entry Level Machine Learning Tutorials

10 Best + Free Machine Learning Courses Collection

3D Mapping Initialization: Using RGB-D Images and Camera Parameters

It Is Okay If You Don't Know What You Like. We Do (feat. Deep Recommendation Algorithms)

10 Machine Learning, Data Science, and Deep Learning Courses for Programmers in 2020

10 Computer Vision Startups on Product Hunt with the Most Upvotes

10 Best Entry Level Machine Learning Tutorials

10 Best + Free Machine Learning Courses Collection

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Minty

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps