Read in full: SEC v. Caroline Ellison and Zixiao "Gary" Wang

Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) v. Caroline Ellison (“Ellison”) and Zixiao “Gary” Wang (“Wang”) Court Filing, Dec 21 2022 is part of . You can jump to any part in this filing . This is the table of links with all 12 parts. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here Feature Image: The tweet where Caroline gave away her floor price to CZ after the leaked Alameda balance sheet. : 1:22-cv-10794 Case Number : Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) Plaintiffs : Caroline Ellison (“Ellison”) and Zixiao “Gary” Wang (“Wang”) Defendants : Dec 21, 2022 Filing Date : US District Court, Southern District of New York Location : Jorge G. Tenreiro, David L. Hirsch (not admitted in SDNY), Ladan F. Stewart, Amy Harman Burkart, David J. D'Addio - Attorneys for the Plaintiff Filer TABLE OF LINKS I - Complaint and Summary II - Violations III - Nature of the Proceeding and Relief sought IV - Jurisdiction and Venue V - Defendants VI - Relevant Parties and Entities VII - Facts Part A: Bankman-Fried, Actively Supported by Defendants, Created a Complex Web of Entities, with FTX and Alameda at Its Center VIII - Facts Part B: Defendants Used Alameda to Carry Out the Fraudulent Scheme IX - Facts Part C: Defendants Knew that FTX Had Poor Controls and Deeply Inadequate Risk Management Procedures, in Stark Contrast to Bankman-Fried’s Claims that It Was a Mature, Conservative Company X - Facts Part D: Despite the Precarious Financial Position of FTX and Alameda, Bankman- Fried and Ellison Continued to Use FTX Customer Assets in the Summer of 2022, Including to Rescue Distressed Crypto Firms and to Further Mislead Investors XI - Facts Part E: Even as the Scheme Was Spiraling Out of Control, Bankman-Fried and Ellison, with Wang’s Knowledge, Continued to Mislead Investors and the Public About FTX’s True Financial Condition. XII - Claims for Relief and Jury Demand About We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: This court case 1:22-cv-10794 on Dec 21 2022, is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. retrieved

Read in full: SEC v. Caroline Ellison and Zixiao "Gary" Wang

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

20% of All General Searches in the U.S. Go Through the Default on User-Downloaded Version of Chrome

At SBF's direction, Caroline materially misled investors that Alameda was fine. It was not.

Caroline Ellison and Garry Wang violated SEC's rules, per lawsuit

Caroline Ellison was CEO of Alameda but did not own it, while Gary wang owned 10% of Alameda

Charged with fraud by the SEC, Caroline Ellison and Garry Wang wisely turned on SBF

Ellison and Wang carried out the fraud via coding & accounting tricks, but SBF was the architect

20% of All General Searches in the U.S. Go Through the Default on User-Downloaded Version of Chrome

At SBF's direction, Caroline materially misled investors that Alameda was fine. It was not.

Caroline Ellison and Garry Wang violated SEC's rules, per lawsuit

Caroline Ellison was CEO of Alameda but did not own it, while Gary wang owned 10% of Alameda

Charged with fraud by the SEC, Caroline Ellison and Garry Wang wisely turned on SBF

Ellison and Wang carried out the fraud via coding & accounting tricks, but SBF was the architect

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Minty

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps