Table of Links Abstract and 1 Introduction 2. Data 3. Measuring Media Slant and 3.1. Text pre-processing and featurization 3.2. Classifying transcripts by TV source 3.3. Text similarity between newspapers and TV stations and 3.4. Topic model 4. Econometric Framework 4.1. Instrumental variables specification 4.2. Instrument first stage and validity 5. Results 5.1. Main results 5.2. Robustness checks 6. Mechanisms and Heterogeneity 6.1. Local vs. national or international news content 6.2. Cable news media slant polarizes local newspapers 7. Conclusion and References Online Appendices A. Data Appendix A.1. Newspaper articles A.2. Alternative county matching of newspapers and A.3. Filtering of the article snippets A.4. Included prime-time TV shows and A.5. Summary statistics B. Methods Appendix, B.1. Text pre-processing and B.2. Bigrams most predictive for FNC or CNN/MSNBC B.3. Human validation of NLP model B.4. Distribution of Fox News similarity in newspapers and B.5. Example articles by Fox News similarity B.6. Topics from the newspaper-based LDA model C. Results Appendix C.1. First stage results and C.2. Instrument exogeneity C.3. Placebo: Content similarity in 1995/96 C.4. OLS results C.5. Reduced form results C.6. Sub-samples: Newspaper headquarters and other counties and C.7. Robustness: Alternative county matching C.8. Robustness: Historical circulation weights and C.9. Robustness: Relative circulation weights C.10. Robustness: Absolute and relative FNC viewership and C.11. Robustness: Dropping observations and clustering C.12. Mechanisms: Language features and topics C.13. Mechanisms: Descriptive Evidence on Demand Side C.14. Mechanisms: Slant contagion and polarization B. Methods Appendix Here, we present additional material related to the measurement of cable news slant. B.1. Text pre-processing We preprocess all texts (i.e., TV channel transcripts and newspaper articles). We convert them to lowercase and remove non-meaningful stopwords (like and or or ), all nonletter characters, and extra white spaces. Second, for each word, we perform stemming (employing the Porter stemming algorithm). Finally, we form bigrams (phrases of two words). B.2. Bigrams most predictive for FNC or CNN/MSNBC Table B.1 shows some selected bigram examples with positive (predictive for FNC transcripts) or negative (predictive for CNN/MSNBC) values of ψˆ b. Table B.2 provides a more comprehensive list – the 200 bigrams most predictive for a transcript being from FNC or CNN/MSNBC, respectively. That is, the list is ordered such that the FNCrelated bigrams are the 200 bigrams with the largest absolute coefficients in the logistic regression from Section 3). Conversely, CNN/MSNBC-related ones are the 200 bigrams with the most negative coefficients. This paper is available on arxiv under CC 4.0 license. Authors:
(1) Philine Widmer, ETH Zürich and philine.widmer@gess.ethz.ch;
(2) Sergio Galletta, ETH Zürich and sergio.galletta@gess.ethz.ch;
(3) Elliott Ash, ETH Zürich and ashe@ethz.ch. Table of Links Abstract and 1 Introduction 2. Data Abstract and 1 Introduction 2. Data 3. Measuring Media Slant and 3.1. Text pre-processing and featurization 3. Measuring Media Slant and 3.1. Text pre-processing and featurization 3.2. Classifying transcripts by TV source 3.2. Classifying transcripts by TV source 3.3. Text similarity between newspapers and TV stations and 3.4. Topic model 3.3. Text similarity between newspapers and TV stations and 3.4. Topic model 4. Econometric Framework 4.1. Instrumental variables specification 4.1. Instrumental variables specification 4.2. Instrument first stage and validity 4.2. Instrument first stage and validity 5. Results 5.1. Main results 5.1. Main results 5.2. Robustness checks 5.2. Robustness checks 6. Mechanisms and Heterogeneity 6.1. Local vs. national or international news content 6.1. Local vs. national or international news content 6.2. Cable news media slant polarizes local newspapers 6.2. Cable news media slant polarizes local newspapers 7. Conclusion and References 7. Conclusion and References Online Appendices Online Appendices A. Data Appendix A.1. Newspaper articles A.1. Newspaper articles A.2. Alternative county matching of newspapers and A.3. Filtering of the article snippets A.2. Alternative county matching of newspapers and A.3. Filtering of the article snippets A.4. Included prime-time TV shows and A.5. Summary statistics A.4. Included prime-time TV shows and A.5. Summary statistics B. Methods Appendix, B.1. Text pre-processing and B.2. Bigrams most predictive for FNC or CNN/MSNBC B. Methods Appendix, B.1. Text pre-processing and B.2. Bigrams most predictive for FNC or CNN/MSNBC B.3. Human validation of NLP model B.3. Human validation of NLP model B.4. Distribution of Fox News similarity in newspapers and B.5. Example articles by Fox News similarity B.4. Distribution of Fox News similarity in newspapers and B.5. Example articles by Fox News similarity B.6. Topics from the newspaper-based LDA model B.6. Topics from the newspaper-based LDA model C. Results Appendix C.1. First stage results and C.2. Instrument exogeneity C.1. First stage results and C.2. Instrument exogeneity C.3. Placebo: Content similarity in 1995/96 C.3. Placebo: Content similarity in 1995/96 C.4. OLS results C.4. OLS results C.5. Reduced form results C.5. Reduced form results C.6. Sub-samples: Newspaper headquarters and other counties and C.7. Robustness: Alternative county matching C.6. Sub-samples: Newspaper headquarters and other counties and C.7. Robustness: Alternative county matching C.8. Robustness: Historical circulation weights and C.9. Robustness: Relative circulation weights C.8. Robustness: Historical circulation weights and C.9. Robustness: Relative circulation weights C.10. Robustness: Absolute and relative FNC viewership and C.11. Robustness: Dropping observations and clustering C.10. Robustness: Absolute and relative FNC viewership and C.11. Robustness: Dropping observations and clustering C.12. Mechanisms: Language features and topics C.12. Mechanisms: Language features and topics C.13. Mechanisms: Descriptive Evidence on Demand Side C.13. Mechanisms: Descriptive Evidence on Demand Side C.14. Mechanisms: Slant contagion and polarization C.14. Mechanisms: Slant contagion and polarization B. Methods Appendix Here, we present additional material related to the measurement of cable news slant. B.1. Text pre-processing We preprocess all texts (i.e., TV channel transcripts and newspaper articles). We convert them to lowercase and remove non-meaningful stopwords (like and or or ), all nonletter characters, and extra white spaces. Second, for each word, we perform stemming (employing the Porter stemming algorithm). Finally, we form bigrams (phrases of two words). B.2. Bigrams most predictive for FNC or CNN/MSNBC Table B.1 shows some selected bigram examples with positive (predictive for FNC transcripts) or negative (predictive for CNN/MSNBC) values of ψˆ b. Table B.2 provides a more comprehensive list – the 200 bigrams most predictive for a transcript being from FNC or CNN/MSNBC, respectively. That is, the list is ordered such that the FNCrelated bigrams are the 200 bigrams with the largest absolute coefficients in the logistic regression from Section 3). Conversely, CNN/MSNBC-related ones are the 200 bigrams with the most negative coefficients. This paper is available on arxiv under CC 4.0 license. This paper is available on arxiv under CC 4.0 license. available on arxiv Authors: (1) Philine Widmer, ETH Zürich and philine.widmer@gess.ethz.ch; (2) Sergio Galletta, ETH Zürich and sergio.galletta@gess.ethz.ch; (3) Elliott Ash, ETH Zürich and ashe@ethz.ch. Authors: Authors: (1) Philine Widmer, ETH Zürich and philine.widmer@gess.ethz.ch; (2) Sergio Galletta, ETH Zürich and sergio.galletta@gess.ethz.ch; (3) Elliott Ash, ETH Zürich and ashe@ethz.ch.

Part of HackerNoon's growing list of open-source research papers, promoting free access to academic material.

Media Slant is Contagious: Evaluating the Accuracy of Human Guesses

Media Slant is Contagious: The Prime-Time TV Shows and Summary Statistics

MediaBias.TECH

Too Long; Didn't Read

Make resilience your competitive advantage

How We Measured Cable News Slant: Researching Media Bias

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Untitled Story

A Comprehensive Overview of Image Generation Models: From GANs to Diffusion Techniques

Characterizing Cable News Bias: The Methodology You Have to Understand

Media Slant is Contagious: What We Can Conclude From This

Media Slant is Contagious: Here's Why

Media Slant Research: Newspaper-County Observations

A Comprehensive Overview of Image Generation Models: From GANs to Diffusion Techniques

Characterizing Cable News Bias: The Methodology You Have to Understand

Media Slant is Contagious: What We Can Conclude From This

Media Slant is Contagious: Here's Why

Media Slant Research: Newspaper-County Observations

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps