Sam Bankman-Fried’s Written Testimony Notes Dec 12, 2022, is part of
This is part 5 of 11.
Alameda Research became insolvent when the economic environment changed (see here)
Failures of FTX’s internal controls (see here)
Binance’s role in FTX’ collapse.
I won’t belabor this point, because at the end of the day I fucked up. I will note, briefly, the following:
Alameda’s assets fell precipitously in value beginning on Nov. 6th 2022, hours after Binance’s CEO (CZ) tweeted his intent to sell his holdings in FTT
The ‘run on the bank’ was triggered by the same tweet by Binance’s CEO.
That tweet followed what I believe to be a month of sustained negative PR on FTX largely being driven by Binance.
Alameda’s hedges failed in November 2022 because the crash was specific to its hedges, triggered by the same PR campaign by CZ.
Around November 8th, we agreed with CZ on a deal that would have Binance acquire FTX at a small fraction of its value a week earlier.
Roughly ~$3b of capital was used buying Binance’s stake in FTX, because Binance’s equity ownership was causing KYC issues for FTX: Binance was not cooperative in supplying information about CZ to regulatory bodies FTX was applying for licensure with.
A few months ago, FTX was generally considered to be Binance’s most significant competitor globally. After the crash, Binance has averaged roughly 70% of global cryptocurrency volume, up from roughly 50% before.
There are reports that, due to its increase in market share following FTX’s collapse, Binance might be able to avoid regulatory enforcement:
https://www.reuters.com/article/fintech-crypto-binance-doj-idCAKBN2SW0ZY
There is much more to say about Binance, its role in the cryptocurrency ecosystem, and its relationship with FTX, but this is neither the place nor the time for it.
Continue reading here.